Author Affiliations
College of Information Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou, Jiangxi 341000, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Local refinement diagram of HBS
Fig. 2. Flow chart of algorithm
Fig. 3. Segmentation and registration results of brain MRI and lung CT images. (a) Image to be registered; (b) image of target; (c) initial image difference; (d) segmented contours; (e)-(g) control grid; (h) forward deformed mesh; (i) backward deformed mesh; (j) result of segmentation; (k) result of registration; (l) image difference after registration
Fig. 4. Results of segmentation. (a) Target images without noise-free; (b) images to be registered; (c) segmentation result of images to be registered; (d)-(f) target images with noise intensities of 0.02, 0.05, and 0.1; (g)-(i) segmentation results of Fig. (d)-Fig. (f) by level set method; (j)-(l) segmentation results of Fig. (d)-Fig. (f) by proposed method
Fig. 5. Registration results of two methods. (a) Images to be registered; (b) images of target; (c) registration results of HBS; (d) final image differences of HBS; (e) registration results of DHBS; (f) final image differences of DHBS
Fig. 6. Results of registration. (a) Images to be registered; (b) images of target; (c) registration results of HBS; (d) registration results of joint method; (e) registration results of proposed method; (f) final image differences of HBS; (g) final image differences of joint method; (h) final image differences of proposed method
Fig. 7. Noise experiment comparison chart. (a) Images to be registered; (b) images of target; (c) registration results of joint method; (d) registration results of proposed method; (e) final image differences of joint method; (f) final image differences of proposed method
Noise intensity | Level set method | Proposed method | |
---|
Triangle /% | | C-shape /% | Triangle /% | C-shape /% |
---|
0.02 | 99.32 | 99.21 | 99.33 | 99.36 | 0.05 | 96.76 | 95.99 | 99.27 | 99.23 | 0.10 | 91.83 | 90.06 | 99.12 | 99.08 |
|
Table 1. DS value of two segmentation methods
Image | MSE | Registration time /s | |
---|
HBS | | DHBS | HBS | DHBS |
---|
First group | 35.98 | 33.86 | 762.44 | 799.68 | Second group | 45.52 | 42.37 | 892.54 | 927.59 | Third group | 37.56 | 36.15 | 810.26 | 831.63 |
|
Table 2. MSE and registration time of two registration methods
Image | MSE | Registration time /s | |
---|
HBS | | Joint method | Proposed method | HBS | Joint method | Proposed method |
---|
First group | 35.98 | 26.82 | 23.97 | 762.44 | 813.56 | 831.26 | Second group | 45.52 | 35.17 | 31.38 | 892.54 | 939.17 | 960.78 | Third group | 37.56 | 29.33 | 26.89 | 810.26 | 890.35 | 899.62 | Fourth group | 72.31 | 52.16 | 51.37 | 997.68 | 1105.29 | 1123.60 |
|
Table 3. MSE and registration time of three registration methods
Noise intensity | MSE | Registration time /s | |
---|
Joint method | | Proposed method | Joint method | Proposed method |
---|
0 | 26.82 | 23.97 | 813.56 | 831.26 | 0.02 | 29.69 | 25.63 | 861.78 | 895.21 | 0.05 | 33.56 | 28.29 | 901.33 | 942.45 |
|
Table 4. MSE and registration time under different noise intensities