• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 40, Issue 8, 0805001 (2020)
Liangliang Yang*, Chenglin Liu, Falin Lu, Qiaoying Tong, Yongbing Zhao, and Renjia Guo
Author Affiliations
  • School of Physics and Electronics Engineering, Yancheng Teachers University, Yancheng, Jiangsu 224007, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS202040.0805001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Liangliang Yang, Chenglin Liu, Falin Lu, Qiaoying Tong, Yongbing Zhao, Renjia Guo. Tilt Error Based on Comprehensive Bandwidth Integral Average Diffraction Efficiency[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2020, 40(8): 0805001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Refraction of incident rays at surface of MLDOEs
    Fig. 1. Refraction of incident rays at surface of MLDOEs
    Decenter error of MLDOEs
    Fig. 2. Decenter error of MLDOEs
    Diffraction efficiency versus tilt error at two wavelengths at normal incidence
    Fig. 3. Diffraction efficiency versus tilt error at two wavelengths at normal incidence
    BIADE versus tilt error at normal incidence
    Fig. 4. BIADE versus tilt error at normal incidence
    BIADE versus tilt error at oblique incidence
    Fig. 5. BIADE versus tilt error at oblique incidence
    BIADE versus decenter error
    Fig. 7. BIADE versus decenter error
    BIADE versus tilt error and decenter error at oblique incidence, in which the illustration is an enlarged version
    Fig. 8. BIADE versus tilt error and decenter error at oblique incidence, in which the illustration is an enlarged version
    Comprehensive BIADE with decenter error
    Fig. 9. Comprehensive BIADE with decenter error
    Comprehensive BIADE with considering other errors, in which the illustration is an enlarged version
    Fig. 10. Comprehensive BIADE with considering other errors, in which the illustration is an enlarged version
    Incident angle /(°)BIADE /%
    α=0°α=2°α=5°α=10°
    099.9799.9699.7195.83
    599.9698.6090.6558.13
    1099.8093.4467.3513.47
    1598.5780.2131.991.78
    2090.9048.563.392.33*
    Note:“*” has no reference significance. As can be seen from figure 5, it is the corresponding value that increases after BIADE decreases.
    Table 1. Relationship between BIADE and tilt error α at oblique incidence
    Comprehensive BIADE /%Tilt error /(°)
    θi=0°θi∈(0°,5°]θi∈(0°,10°]θi∈(0°,15°]θi∈(0°,20°]
    988.293.841.991.010.25
    9510.485.673.241.900.92
    9012.537.504.612.911.69
    Table 2. Comprehensive BIADE versus tilt error within different incident angle ranges θi
    Comprehensive BIADE /%Tilt error /(°)
    ε=0%ε=+2%ε=-2%ε=+5%ε=-5%ε=+10%ε=-10%
    980.77--3.751.67--3.863.543.081.97
    955.175.414.890.97--5.704.402.87--5.973.36
    906.556.806.287.145.810.93--7.574.87
    Table 3. Relationship of tilt errors based on comprehensive BIADE with considering other errors
    Liangliang Yang, Chenglin Liu, Falin Lu, Qiaoying Tong, Yongbing Zhao, Renjia Guo. Tilt Error Based on Comprehensive Bandwidth Integral Average Diffraction Efficiency[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2020, 40(8): 0805001
    Download Citation