• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 9, Issue 2, 252 (2021)
Khant Minn1, Blake Birmingham1, Brian Ko1、2, Ho Wai Howard Lee1、2、3、4、5、*, and Zhenrong Zhang1、6、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Physics, Baylor University, Waco, Texas 76798, USA
  • 2The Institute for Quantum Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA
  • 3Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, USA
  • 4Beckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, USA
  • 5e-mail: Howardhw.lee@uci.edu
  • 6e-mail: Zhenrong_Zhang@baylor.edu
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.411583 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Khant Minn, Blake Birmingham, Brian Ko, Ho Wai Howard Lee, Zhenrong Zhang. Interfacing photonic crystal fiber with a metallic nanoantenna for enhanced light nanofocusing[J]. Photonics Research, 2021, 9(2): 252 Copy Citation Text show less
    PCF-nanoantenna hybrid probe. (a) Schematics of the device. (b) Simulated intensity profile of fundamental guided mode in the PCF at 560 nm wavelength. (c) Simulated intensity profile of HE11 mode on a metallic nanowire waveguide at the same wavelength.
    Fig. 1. PCF-nanoantenna hybrid probe. (a) Schematics of the device. (b) Simulated intensity profile of fundamental guided mode in the PCF at 560 nm wavelength. (c) Simulated intensity profile of HE11 mode on a metallic nanowire waveguide at the same wavelength.
    Device fabrication with electron-beam-induced deposition (EBID). (a) Schematics of the EBID process and overview SEM image of PCF. (b)–(e) SEM images of the fabricated samples on PCFs taken at 52 degrees inclination. The deposition parameters, base diameter, and height of each tip are tabulated in the Methods section.
    Fig. 2. Device fabrication with electron-beam-induced deposition (EBID). (a) Schematics of the EBID process and overview SEM image of PCF. (b)–(e) SEM images of the fabricated samples on PCFs taken at 52 degrees inclination. The deposition parameters, base diameter, and height of each tip are tabulated in the Methods section.
    Fiber coupling and the polarization-resolved imaging of side-scattered light. (a) Schematic of the optical setup. (b) Illustration of SPP vector components along the tip. (c)–(f) Optical images of the side scattering from the tip when the output polarizer is (c), (e) along the tip axis (longitudinal), and (d), (f) perpendicular to the tip axis (transverse). (c), (d) Taken with 530 nm filter. (e), (f) Taken with 630 nm filter. The dashed lines are the visual guide for outline of the PCF. The bottom panel is the SEM image overlaid on the optical image.
    Fig. 3. Fiber coupling and the polarization-resolved imaging of side-scattered light. (a) Schematic of the optical setup. (b) Illustration of SPP vector components along the tip. (c)–(f) Optical images of the side scattering from the tip when the output polarizer is (c), (e) along the tip axis (longitudinal), and (d), (f) perpendicular to the tip axis (transverse). (c), (d) Taken with 530 nm filter. (e), (f) Taken with 630 nm filter. The dashed lines are the visual guide for outline of the PCF. The bottom panel is the SEM image overlaid on the optical image.
    Effect of rectangular aperture on mode coupling. (a) The electric field intensity profile of the aperture-tip geometry. (b) Propagation along the tip producing nanofocusing at the apex for x-polarized light. The color bar represents the field intensity normalized with respect to excitation intensity. Inset: focusing efficiency as a function of wavelength. (c), (d) Same as (a), (b) but for y-polarization with fields canceling near the apex. The green arrows in (a) and (c) indicate the input polarization.
    Fig. 4. Effect of rectangular aperture on mode coupling. (a) The electric field intensity profile of the aperture-tip geometry. (b) Propagation along the tip producing nanofocusing at the apex for x-polarized light. The color bar represents the field intensity normalized with respect to excitation intensity. Inset: focusing efficiency as a function of wavelength. (c), (d) Same as (a), (b) but for y-polarization with fields canceling near the apex. The green arrows in (a) and (c) indicate the input polarization.
    Side-scattering from the PCF-aperture-antenna system. (a)–(d) Optical images of the side scattering from the tip when the input polarizer is parallel to the gap between the tip and aperture wall, with the output polarizer (a), (c) along the tip axis (longitudinal), and (b), (d) perpendicular to the tip axis (transverse). The tip is present in (a) and (b), while it is absent in (c) and (d). (e)–(h) Scattering from the tip when the input polarizer is perpendicular to the gap between the tip and aperture wall, with the output polarizer (e), (g) along the tip axis and (f), (h) perpendicular to the tip axis. The tip is present in (e) and (f), while it is absent in (g) and (h). Scale bar: 10 μm is for all optical images. The green arrows in the SEM images of the samples on the left panel indicate the orientation of input polarization in the plane of the aperture.
    Fig. 5. Side-scattering from the PCF-aperture-antenna system. (a)–(d) Optical images of the side scattering from the tip when the input polarizer is parallel to the gap between the tip and aperture wall, with the output polarizer (a), (c) along the tip axis (longitudinal), and (b), (d) perpendicular to the tip axis (transverse). The tip is present in (a) and (b), while it is absent in (c) and (d). (e)–(h) Scattering from the tip when the input polarizer is perpendicular to the gap between the tip and aperture wall, with the output polarizer (e), (g) along the tip axis and (f), (h) perpendicular to the tip axis. The tip is present in (e) and (f), while it is absent in (g) and (h). Scale bar: 10 μm is for all optical images. The green arrows in the SEM images of the samples on the left panel indicate the orientation of input polarization in the plane of the aperture.
    Scan Diameter (nm)Dwell Time (µs)PassesTotal Time (s)Base Diameter (nm)Height (µm)Corresponding Figure
    7511,343,069321670.950Fig. 2(c), iii
    7512,166,241521461.263Fig. 2(c), i
    7514,332,4821041642.353Fig. 2(d)
    10014,332,482131730.561Fig. 2(c), iv
    10011,083,121321901.098Fig. 2(c), ii
    10021,126,445652161.060
    10021,689,668982411.610Fig. 2(e)
    10022,166,2411262371.953
    Table 1. EBID Deposition Parameters and Corresponding Tip Dimensions
    Khant Minn, Blake Birmingham, Brian Ko, Ho Wai Howard Lee, Zhenrong Zhang. Interfacing photonic crystal fiber with a metallic nanoantenna for enhanced light nanofocusing[J]. Photonics Research, 2021, 9(2): 252
    Download Citation