Qiang Zhang, Peixiang Li, Zhiyuan Gu, Shaoding Liu, Zejun Duan, "Indefinite metacavities coupled to a mirror: bound states in the continuum with anomalous resonance scaling," Photonics Res. 12, 598 (2024)

Search by keywords or author
- Photonics Research
- Vol. 12, Issue 3, 598 (2024)

Fig. 1. HMMs and IMCs made of Ag–Si multilayers. (a) Real parts of effective in-pane ( ε x / y ) and out-of-plane ( ε z ) permittivities of the HMM. The IMC made by Ag–Si multilayers and the IFS of the corresponding HMM are shown by the left and right insets, respectively. (b) Spectrum of the radiation power of an x -direction electric dipole close to the IMC. Distributions of the predominate components of near fields of the cavity modes of selected orders.

Fig. 2. BIC and PA in IMC arrays coupled to a reflecting mirror. (a) Schematic of the structure of IMC arrays coupled to an Ag mirror. The IMC array has a square lattice with period a = 700 nm . The separation between the array and the Ag mirror is determined by the thickness of the SiO 2 spacer (s ). The whole structure is excited by a normally incident plane wave. (b) Evolution of absorption spectra, resonance wavelength, and Q factors as a function of s . The positions of BIC and PA are marked by the red and blue arrows. (c) Absorption spectra at the PA point (s = 320 nm , red solid line), at the BIC point (s = 140 nm , blue dashed line), and without the mirror (black dashed–dotted line). For comparison, the spectra of the cavity made of effective hyperbolic medium are appended as symbols. (d) Spectra of maximum electric field enhancement at the PA point, at the BIC point, and without the mirror. Amplitude distributions of electric and magnetic fields at the absorption peak at the PA point. (d) shares the same legends as (c).

Fig. 3. Damping rates and PA realized due to critical coupling. (a) Total damping rate γ t , radiative damping rate γ r , and nonradiative damping rate γ nr as a function of s . (b) Comparison between the absorption spectra obtained by Eq. (3 ) and numerical calculations.

Fig. 4. Absorption maps as a function of wavelength and s for mirror coupled IMCs with different parameters. (a) w = 80 nm , (b) w = 120 nm , (c) 6 Ag–Si pairs, (d) 10 Ag–Si pairs, (e) f m = 0.3 , and (f) f m = 0.7 . Other parameters are the same as those in Fig. 2.

Fig. 5. Mode characteristics of mode (1, 1, 2), mode (1, 1, 3), and mode (1, 1, 4). (a) Absorption (left y axis) and reflection (right y axis) spectra of the structure in the wavelength range from 1400 to 2450 nm. The absorption peaks of mode (1, 1, 2), mode (1, 1, 3), and mode (1, 1, 4) are marked by red dot (red solid line), blue square (blue dashed line), and green triangle (green dashed–dotted line), in turn. (b) Resonance wavelengths (lines) and Q factors (symbols) as a function of s . (c) γ r (lines) and γ nr (symbols) as a function of s . The styles of lines and symbols in (b) and (c) are in accordance with those markers in (a) for different modes.

Fig. 6. Enhancement of Purcell effect by BICs in mirror coupled IMC arrays. (a) Spectra of Purcell factor of the structures for different s . (b) Normalized Purcell factor as a function of s .

Fig. 7. Optical phase diagram of the effective medium made of stacked Ag–Si multilayers.

Fig. 8. Cross-section view of the IFSs of Ag–Si HMMs (f m = 0.5 ) and Si on the k x − k z plane for a short and a long wavelength. k ′ is the magnitude of a reference wave vector which is set as 2 π / 1200 nm . The vertical dashed lines are guide for fixed k x .

Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address