• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 8, Issue 2, 151 (2020)
Biao Xiong1, Xun Li1, Shi-Lei Chao1, Zhen Yang1, Wen-Zhao Zhang2, Weiping Zhang3、4, and Ling Zhou1、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Physics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
  • 2Department of Physics, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
  • 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
  • 4Collaborative Innovation Center of Extreme Optics, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.8.000151 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Biao Xiong, Xun Li, Shi-Lei Chao, Zhen Yang, Wen-Zhao Zhang, Weiping Zhang, Ling Zhou. Strong mechanical squeezing in an optomechanical system based on Lyapunov control[J]. Photonics Research, 2020, 8(2): 151 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic of the considered system, where the mechanical frequency is modulated through the tuning electrode. The left setups are used to detect the obtained mechanical squeezing.
    Fig. 1. Schematic of the considered system, where the mechanical frequency is modulated through the tuning electrode. The left setups are used to detect the obtained mechanical squeezing.
    (a) and (b) show time evolution of Δp2 with the time-varying frequency ωr(t) at the control case presented in (c) and (d), respectively, where Δc′=ωm, κ=0.1ωm, γ=10−6ωm, n¯mT=0, and c=0.2.
    Fig. 2. (a) and (b) show time evolution of Δp2 with the time-varying frequency ωr(t) at the control case presented in (c) and (d), respectively, where Δc=ωm, κ=0.1ωm, γ=106ωm, n¯mT=0, and c=0.2.
    Time evolution of Δp2 at different G and Δc′ in (a) and (b), respectively, where (c) and (d) are the corresponding time-varying control fields. The other parameters are the same as in Fig. 2.
    Fig. 3. Time evolution of Δp2 at different G and Δc in (a) and (b), respectively, where (c) and (d) are the corresponding time-varying control fields. The other parameters are the same as in Fig. 2.
    Wigner function in units of 1/100 for ωmt=0 and ωmt=30 in (a) and (b), respectively. The parameters are the same as in Fig. 2(a).
    Fig. 4. Wigner function in units of 1/100 for ωmt=0 and ωmt=30 in (a) and (b), respectively. The parameters are the same as in Fig. 2(a).
    Plot of squeezing level with different cavity decay κ in (a) and thermal phonon number n¯mT in (b). (c) and (d) are the corresponding control fields. The other parameters are the same as in Fig. 2(a).
    Fig. 5. Plot of squeezing level with different cavity decay κ in (a) and thermal phonon number n¯mT in (b). (c) and (d) are the corresponding control fields. The other parameters are the same as in Fig. 2(a).
    Time evolution of Δq2 with detection and without detection, where Gs/ωm=0.01 and κs/ωm=0.1. The other parameters are the same as in Fig. 2(a).
    Fig. 6. Time evolution of Δq2 with detection and without detection, where Gs/ωm=0.01 and κs/ωm=0.1. The other parameters are the same as in Fig. 2(a).
    Biao Xiong, Xun Li, Shi-Lei Chao, Zhen Yang, Wen-Zhao Zhang, Weiping Zhang, Ling Zhou. Strong mechanical squeezing in an optomechanical system based on Lyapunov control[J]. Photonics Research, 2020, 8(2): 151
    Download Citation