• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 10, Issue 10, 2293 (2022)
Kaige Liu1、2、†, Hengkang Zhang3、†, Shanshan Du1、2, Zeqi Liu1、2, Bin Zhang4、5、*, Xing Fu1、2、6、*, and Qiang Liu1、2、7、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Photonics Control Technology, Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • 2Department of Precision Instrument, State Key Laboratory of Precision Measurement Technology and Instruments, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • 3Beijing Institute of Control Engineering, Beijing 100190, China
  • 4Beijing Institute of Electronic System Engineering, Beijing 100854, China
  • 5e-mail:
  • 6e-mail:
  • 7e-mail:
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.461172 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Kaige Liu, Hengkang Zhang, Shanshan Du, Zeqi Liu, Bin Zhang, Xing Fu, Qiang Liu. Particle manipulation behind a turbid medium based on the intensity transmission matrix[J]. Photonics Research, 2022, 10(10): 2293 Copy Citation Text show less
    Experimental setup. F1, F2, and F3, lens; HWP, half-wave plate; P1 and P2, polarizer; BE, beam expander; M, mirror; BS, beam splitter; S, scattering medium; and Obj, objective lens.
    Fig. 1. Experimental setup. F1, F2, and F3, lens; HWP, half-wave plate; P1 and P2, polarizer; BE, beam expander; M, mirror; BS, beam splitter; S, scattering medium; and Obj, objective lens.
    Focusing result with ITM. (a) Speckle pattern before optimization. (b) Experimental result and target output light field of single focus. (c) Experimental result and target output light field of multiple foci. (d) PBR with different number of control segments in theory, simulation, and experiment. (e) Comparison of TM and ITM in terms of PBR. (f) Comparison of TM and ITM in terms of focus intensity.
    Fig. 2. Focusing result with ITM. (a) Speckle pattern before optimization. (b) Experimental result and target output light field of single focus. (c) Experimental result and target output light field of multiple foci. (d) PBR with different number of control segments in theory, simulation, and experiment. (e) Comparison of TM and ITM in terms of PBR. (f) Comparison of TM and ITM in terms of focus intensity.
    Particle manipulation with single particle along a straight line.
    Fig. 3. Particle manipulation with single particle along a straight line.
    Particle manipulation. (a)–(e) Single focus with a square path. (f)–(j) Double foci with a circle path.
    Fig. 4. Particle manipulation. (a)–(e) Single focus with a square path. (f)–(j) Double foci with a circle path.
    Moving focus with ITM and memory effect. (a) and (b) Uniformity of PBR focused by ITM (64×64 output modes) at different output modes selected with, respectively, intervals of 10 pixels and without intervals. (c) Mean value and variance of the focus PBR with ITM. (d) Moving focus with memory effect. The dashed circles and arrows indicate the vertical axes corresponding to the curves.
    Fig. 5. Moving focus with ITM and memory effect. (a) and (b) Uniformity of PBR focused by ITM (64×64 output modes) at different output modes selected with, respectively, intervals of 10 pixels and without intervals. (c) Mean value and variance of the focus PBR with ITM. (d) Moving focus with memory effect. The dashed circles and arrows indicate the vertical axes corresponding to the curves.
    Kaige Liu, Hengkang Zhang, Shanshan Du, Zeqi Liu, Bin Zhang, Xing Fu, Qiang Liu. Particle manipulation behind a turbid medium based on the intensity transmission matrix[J]. Photonics Research, 2022, 10(10): 2293
    Download Citation