Author Affiliations
1State Key Laboratory for Modern Optical Instrumentation, College of Optical Science and Engineering, International Research Center for Advanced Photonics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China2Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Optical Information Materials and Technology, South China Academy of Advanced Optoelectronics, South China Normal University, Higher-Education Mega-Center, Guangzhou 510006, China3National Center for International Research on Green Optoelectronics, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China4e-mail: chenkaixuan@m.scnu.edu.cnshow less
Fig. 1. (a) Schematic diagram of the four-channel CWDM on TFLN based on an angled MMI structure. (b) Calculated wavelength dependence of the neff curve for the first five TE modes at WMMI=17.54 μm. (c) Calculated neff curve of the first five TE modes at different WMMI at a wavelength of 1300 nm. (d) Simulated light propagation in the proposed angled MMI structure.
Fig. 2. Simulated spectral responses of the proposed CWDM device with different tilted angles: (a) θ=0.17 rad, (b) θ=0.15 rad, and (c) θ=0.23 rad. The output waveguide spacing here is Δx=0.88 μm.
Fig. 3. Simulated spectral responses of the proposed CWDM device for (a) θ=0.15 rad, Δx=0.1 μm and (b) θ=0.23 rad, Δx=2.79 μm.
Fig. 4. Simulated fabrication tolerance of the proposed CWDM device with changes (a) in L1 of ΔL1 from −1 to +1 μm, (b) in WMMI of ΔWMMI from −0.04 to +0.04 μm, (c) only in input waveguide width Wa of ΔWa from −2.4 to +2.4 μm, (d) in both input and output waveguide widths Wa of ΔWa from −4 to +4 μm, (e) in t of Δt from −20 to +20 nm, and (f) in h of Δh from −20 to +20 nm for channel #1. Except for the one studied, the rest of the structural parameters are unchanged as shown in Table 1.
Fig. 5. (a) Microscope image of a fabricated device. Scanning electron microscope images of (b) input coupling grating, (c) input waveguide, (d) output waveguides, and (e) output coupling gratings.
Fig. 6. (a) Schematic of the measurement setup. (b) Measured spectral response of the fabricated CWDM device. (c) Measured peak wavelength positions (red dots), linear fit (red dotted line), and simulated peak wavelength positions (blue dots) for channel #1 with variations in WMMI.
, , , , |
---|
Channel # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | [nm] | 1271 | 1291 | 1311 | 1331 | [μm] | 2054 | 2017 | 1980 | 1943 |
|
Table 1. Optimized Structural Parameters for the Four-Channel CWDM Device on TFLN
, , |
---|
Channel # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | | [nm] | 1265 | 1287 | 1309 | 1331 | | [μm] | 2064 | 2023 | 1982 | 1941 | | [nm] | 1277 | 1292 | 1307 | 1322 | | [μm] | 2041 | 2013 | 1985 | 1957 |
|
Table 2. Structural Parameters of the Four-Channel CWDM Device on TFLN for Figs. 2(b) and 2(c)
, , |
---|
Channel # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | | [nm] | 1271 | 1291 | 1311 | 1331 | | [μm] | 2053 | 2015 | 1977 | 1939 | | [nm] | 1271 | 1291 | 1311 | 1331 | | [μm] | 2053 | 2017 | 1981 | 1945 |
|
Table 3. Structural Parameters of the Four-Channel CWDM Device on TFLN for Figs. 3(a) and 3(b)
Device | Footprint () | Channel Amount/Spacing (nm) | Insertion Loss (dB) | a (dB) | |
---|
Si [19] PCG | 0.25 × 0.16 | 4/20.2 | 2.2 | 23.3 | NMb | Si [20] CMZI | 0.3 × 0.1 | 4/20 | | | 19 | Si [22] MMI | 0.012 × 1.21 | 4/21 | 2 | 20 | 12 | Si [25] MWGc | 0.6 × 0.04 | 4/20 | | | d | SiN [26] CMZI | 1 × 0.6 | 4/20 | | 15–24 | d | USRN [27] CVGe | 0.0006 × 8f | 8/20 | 1 | 25 | 7.7 | SiN [23] MMI | 0.02 × 1.7 | 4/19 | 1.5 | 16–27 | 11 | SiN [21] MWG | 0.23 × 1.95 | 4/20 | | 18 | 10d | This work | 0.02 × 2.1 | 4/20 | | | |
|
Table 4. Performance Comparison of Different Types of CWDM Devices