• Resources Science
  • Vol. 42, Issue 7, 1395 (2020)
Tao XU1, Qi Ni2, Dan Qiao1, Liuyang YAO3, and Minjuan ZHAO2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Management School, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
  • 2College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
  • 3School of International Business, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.18402/resci.2020.07.15 Cite this Article
    Tao XU, Qi Ni, Dan Qiao, Liuyang YAO, Minjuan ZHAO. Distance effect on the willingness of rural residents to participate in watershed ecological restoration: Evidence from the Shiyang River Basin[J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(7): 1395 Copy Citation Text show less
    References

    [1] 王奕淇, 李国平, 延步青. 流域生态服务价值横向补偿分摊研究[J]. 资源科学, 2019,41(6):1013-1023. [ Wang YQ, Li GP, Yan BQ. Sharing of watershed ecosystem service value horizontal compensation burden by downstream cities[J]. Resources Science, 2019,41(6):1013-1023.] [Wang Y Q, Li G P, Yan B Q. Sharing of watershed ecosystem service value horizontal compensation burden by downstream cities[J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(6): 1013-1023.]

    [2] 史恒通, 睢党臣, 吴海霞, 等. 公众对黑河流域生态系统服务消费偏好及支付意愿研究: 基于选择实验法的实证分析[J]. 地理科学, 2019,39(2):342-350. [ Shi HT, Sui DC, Wu HX, et al. Public preference and willingness to pay for the Heihe River Watershed ecosystem service: An empirical study on choice experiments[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019,39(2):342-350.] [Shi H T, Sui D C, Wu H X, et al. Public preference and willingness to pay for the Heihe River Watershed ecosystem service: An empirical study on choice experiments[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019, 39(2): 342-350.]

    [3] 颜俨, 姚柳杨, 郎亮明, 等. 基于Meta回归方法的中国内陆河流域生态系统服务价值再评估[J]. 地理学报, 2019,74(5):1040-1057. [ YanY, Yao LY, Lang LM, et al. Revaluation of ecosystem services in inland river basins of China: Based on Meta-regression analysis[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019,74(5):1040-1057.] [Yan Y, Yao L Y, Lang L M, et al. Revaluation of ecosystem services in inland river basins of China: Based on Meta-regression analysis[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(5): 1040-1057.]

    [4] 马宏伟. 石羊河流域蒸散发遥感反演及生态需水研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2011. [ Ma HW. Estimation of Evapotranspiration Using Remote Sensing Technology and Research on Ecological Water Requirement of Shiyang River Basin[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2011.] [Ma H W. Estimation of Evapotranspiration Using Remote Sensing Technology and Research on Ecological Water Requirement of Shiyang River Basin[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2011.]

    [5] 王云, 潘竟虎. 基于生态系统服务价值重构的干旱内陆河流域生态安全格局优化: 以张掖市甘州区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2019,39(10):3455-3467. [ WangY, Pan JH. Establishment of ecological security patterns based on ecosystem services value reconstruction in an arid inland basin: A case study of the Ganzhou District, Zhangye City, Gansu Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019,39(10):3455-3467.] [Wang Y, Pan J H. Establishment of ecological security patterns based on ecosystem services value reconstruction in an arid inland basin: A case study of the Ganzhou District, Zhangye City, Gansu Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(10): 3455-3467.]

    [6] 黎元生, 胡熠. 流域生态环境整体性治理的路径探析: 基于河长制改革的视角[J]. 中国特色社会主义研究, 2017,1(4):73-77. [ Li YS, HuY. An analysis on the path of comprehensive control of the basin ecological environment: Based on the reform of the River Chief system[J]. Studies on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics, 2017,1(4):73-77.] [Li Y S, Hu Y. An analysis on the path of comprehensive control of the basin ecological environment: Based on the reform of the River Chief system[J]. Studies on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics, 2017, 1(4): 73-77.]

    [7] 杜建国, 王梦丹, 许玲燕. 集约经营格局下小流域农业面源污染治理模式及其策略比较研究[J]. 系统工程, 2018,36(12):107-118. [ Du JG, Wang MD, Xu LY. Comparative study on governance modes and strategies of agricultural non-point source pollution in small watershed under intensive management pattern[J]. Systems Engineering, 2018,36(12):107-118.] [Du J G, Wang M D, Xu L Y. Comparative study on governance modes and strategies of agricultural non-point source pollution in small watershed under intensive management pattern[J]. Systems Engineering, 2018, 36(12): 107-118.]

    [8] 朱喜群. 生态治理的多元协同: 太湖流域个案[J]. 改革, 2017, (2):96-107. [ Zhu XQ. Multiple coordination of ecological governance: A case study of Taihu River Basin[J]. Reform, 2017, (2):96-107.] [Zhu X Q. Multiple coordination of ecological governance: A case study of Taihu River Basin[J]. Reform, 2017, (2): 96-107.]

    [9] 樊胜岳, 马永欢, 钟方雷. 民勤县生态政策实施的效果在农户中的响应[J]. 中央民族大学学报, 2006,33(1):32-39. [ Fan SY, Ma YH, Zhong FL. Farmland households’ response to the actualizing effect of eco-policies in Minqin[J]. Journal of The Central University For Nationalities (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2006,33(1):32-39.] [Fan S Y, Ma Y H, Zhong F L. Farmland households’ response to the actualizing effect of eco-policies in Minqin[J]. Journal of The Central University For Nationalities (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 33(1): 32-39.]

    [10] 史恒通, 睢党臣, 徐涛, 等. 生态价值认知对农民流域生态治理参与意愿的影响: 以陕西省渭河流域为例[J]. 中国农村观察, 2017, (2):68-80. [ Shi HT, Sui DC, XuT, et al. Influence of ecological value cognition on farmers willingness to participate in ecological management: Based on Weihe Basin in Shaanxi Province[J]. China Rural Survey, 2017, (2):68-80.] [Shi H T, Sui D C, Xu T, et al. Influence of ecological value cognition on farmers willingness to participate in ecological management: Based on Weihe Basin in Shaanxi Province[J]. China Rural Survey, 2017, (2): 68-80.]

    [11] 刘佳. 公众参与流域生态补偿意愿的影响因素研究: 以福建省南平市延平区西塔溪为例[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2015. [ LiuJ. Study on Factors Influenced Public Participation in Valley Ecological Compensation: Based on Fujian Province Nanping City Yanping District Xi Taxi[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2015.] [Liu J. Study on Factors Influenced Public Participation in Valley Ecological Compensation: Based on Fujian Province Nanping City Yanping District Xi Taxi[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2015.]

    [12] 宾幕容, 覃一枝, 周发明. 湘江流域农户生猪养殖污染治理意愿分析[J]. 经济地理, 2016,36(11):154-160. [ Bin MR, Qin YZ, Zhou FM. Influencing factors and hierarchy of farmers’ willingness on pig breeding pollution control in Xiangjiang River Basin: Based on investigation of 367 pig famers[J]. Economic Geography, 2016,36(11):154-160.] [Bin M R, Qin Y Z, Zhou F M. Influencing factors and hierarchy of farmers’ willingness on pig breeding pollution control in Xiangjiang River Basin: Based on investigation of 367 pig famers[J]. Economic Geography, 2016, 36(11): 154-160.]

    [13] 赵喜鹏, 郝仕龙, 张彦鹏. 生态敏感区清洁小流域农户施肥行为调查研究[J]. 人民黄河, 2018,40(11):97-101. [ Zhao XP, Hao SL, Zhang YP. Study on farmers’ fertilization behavior in clean small watershed of ecologically sensitive area[J]. Yellow River, 2018,40(11):97-101.] [Zhao X P, Hao S L, Zhang Y P. Study on farmers’ fertilization behavior in clean small watershed of ecologically sensitive area[J]. Yellow River, 2018, 40(11): 97-101.]

    [14] 王烨冰, 李国志. 农民参与水环境治理的国际经验和模式构建: 以中国浙江省丽水市为例[J]. 世界农业, 2015, (10):55-59. [ Wang YB, Li GZ. International experience and model construction of farmers’ participation in water environment management: A case study of Lishui City, Zhejiang Province, China[J]. World Agriculture, 2015, (10):55-59.] [Wang Y B, Li G Z. International experience and model construction of farmers’ participation in water environment management: A case study of Lishui City, Zhejiang Province, China[J]. World Agriculture, 2015, (10): 55-59.]

    [15] 史恒通, 睢党臣, 吴海霞, 等. 社会资本对农户参与流域生态治理行为的影响: 以黑河流域为例[J]. 中国农村经济, 2018, (1):34-45. [ Shi HT, Sui DC, Wu HX, et al. The influence of social capital on farmer’s participation in watershed ecological management behavior: Evidence from Heihe Basin[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2018, (1):34-45.] [Shi H T, Sui D C, Wu H X, et al. The influence of social capital on farmer’s participation in watershed ecological management behavior: Evidence from Heihe Basin[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2018, (1): 34-45.]

    [16] Bateman IJ, Day BH, GeorgiouS et al. The aggregation of environmental benefit values: Welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP[J]. Ecological Economics, 60, 450-460(2006).

    [17] 敖长林, 高丹, 毛碧琦, 等. 空间尺度下公众对环境保护的支付意愿度量方法及实证研究[J]. 资源科学, 2015,37(11):2288-2298. [ Ao CL, GaoD, Mao BQ, et al. Methods for measuring public willingness to pay for environmental conservation and empirical research under spatial scale[J]. Resources Science, 2015,37(11):2288-2298. ] [Ao C L, Gao D, Mao B Q, et al. Methods for measuring public willingness to pay for environmental conservation and empirical research under spatial scale[J]. Resources Science, 2015, 37(11): 2288-2298. ]

    [18] 焦扬, 敖长林, 佟锐, 等. 支付意愿距离衰减效应一次趋势面构建与实证[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2016,36(7):1879-1889. [ JiaoY, Ao CL, TongR, et al. Construction of trend surface and distance decay effect of willingness to pay[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2016,36(7):1879-1889.] [Jiao Y, Ao C L, Tong R, et al. Construction of trend surface and distance decay effect of willingness to pay[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2016, 36(7): 1879-1889.]

    [19] Olsen SB, Jensen CU, Panduro TE et al. Modelling strategies for discontinuous distance decay in willingness to pay for ecosystem services[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 75, 351-386(2020).

    [20] Liu WP, Chen WJ, Dong CL et al. Spatial decay of recreational services of urban parks: Characteristics and influencing factors[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 25, 130-138(2017).

    [21] Sutherland RJ, Walsh RG. Effect of distance on the preservation value of water quality[J]. Land Economics, 64, 281-291(1985).

    [22] Hanink DM. The economic geography in environmental issues: A spatial-analytic approach[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 19, 372-387(1995).

    [23] SchaafsmaM, BrouwerR, RoseJ. Directional heterogeneity in WTP models for environmental valuation[J]. Ecological Economics, 79, 21-31(2012).

    [24] 敖长林, 陈瑾婷, 焦扬, 等. 生态保护价值的距离衰减性: 以三江平原湿地为例[J]. 生态学报, 2013,33(16):5109-5117. [ Ao CL, Chen JT, JiaoY, et al. The effect of distance on the ecological conservation value: A case study of Sanjiang Plain Wetland[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013,33(16):5109-5117.] [Ao C L, Chen J T, Jiao Y, et al. The effect of distance on the ecological conservation value: A case study of Sanjiang Plain Wetland[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(16): 5109-5117.]

    [25] Kim JH, Kim SN, DohS. The distance decay of willingness to pay and the spatial distribution of benefits and costs for the ecological restoration of an urban branch stream in Ulsan, South Korea[J]. The Annals of Regional Science, 54, 835-853(2015).

    [26] HanleyN, Schl?pferF, SpurgeonJ. Aggregating the benefits of environmental improvements: Distance-decay functions for use and non-use values[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 68, 297-304(2003).

    [27] Choi AS. Nonmarket values of major resources in the Korean DMZ areas: A test of distance decay[J]. Ecological Economics, 88, 97-107(2013).

    [28] 佟锐. 基于廉价磋商方法的CVM假想偏差修正与实证研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2016. [ TongR. Correction and Empirical Study on CVM Hypothetical Bias Based on Cheap Talk[D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2016.] [Tong R. Correction and Empirical Study on CVM Hypothetical Bias Based on Cheap Talk[D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2016.]

    [29] 杨卫兵, 丰景春, 张可. 农村居民水环境治理支付意愿及影响因素研究: 基于江苏省的问卷调查[J]. 中南财经政法大学学报, 2015, (4):58-65. [ Yang WB, Feng JC, ZhangK. Study of payment willingness and influence factors of water environment governance of rural residents: Based on the survey data of Jiangsu Province[J]. Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, 2015, (4):58-65.] [Yang W B, Feng J C, Zhang K. Study of payment willingness and influence factors of water environment governance of rural residents: Based on the survey data of Jiangsu Province [J]. Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, 2015, (4): 58-65.]

    [30] Torres-MirallesM, GrammatikopoulouI, Rescia AJ. Employing contingent and inferred valuation methods to evaluate the conservation of olive groves and associated ecosystem services in Andalusia (Spain)[J]. Ecosystem Services, 26, 258-269(2017).

    [31] 徐涛, 姚柳杨, 乔丹, 等. 节水灌溉技术社会生态效益评估: 以石羊河下游民勤县为例[J]. 资源科学, 2016,38(10):1925-1934. [ XuT, Yao LY, QiaoD, et al. Social and ecological benefits evaluation of water-saving irrigation technology adoption in Minqin County[J]. Resources Science, 2016,38(10):1925-1934.] [Xu T, Yao L Y, Qiao D, et al. Social and ecological benefits evaluation of water-saving irrigation technology adoption in Minqin County[J]. Resources Science, 2016, 38(10): 1925-1934.]

    [32] 姚柳杨, 赵敏娟, 徐涛. 耕地保护政策的社会福利分析: 基于选择实验的非市场价值评估[J]. 农业经济问题, 2017,38(2):32-40. [ Yao LY, Zhao MJ, XuT. Social benefits under land conservation policy: A choice experiment for non-market valuation[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2017,38(2):32-40.] [Yao L Y, Zhao M J, Xu T. Social benefits under land conservation policy: A choice experiment for non-market valuation[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2017, 38(2): 32-40.]

    [33] Johnston RJ, Abdulrahman AS. Systematic non-response in discrete choice experiments: Implications for the valuation of climate risk reductions[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 6, 246-267(2017).

    [34] HensherD, ShoreN, TrainK. Households’ willingness to pay for water service attributes[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 32, 509-531(2005).

    [35] HensherD, Greene WH. The Mixed Logit model: The state of practice[J]. Transportation, 30, 133-176(2003).

    [36] 徐涛, 赵敏娟, 乔丹. 内陆河生态系统恢复效益评估: 以黑河流域为例[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2018,18(4):127-136. [ XuT, Zhao MJ, QiaoD. Ecological system restoration benefits evaluation of the continental river system in northwestern China: Based on the Heihe River Basin[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2018,18(4):127-136.] [Xu T, Zhao M J, Qiao D. Ecological system restoration benefits evaluation of the continental river system in northwestern China: Based on the Heihe River Basin[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 18(4): 127-136.]

    [37] Yao LY, Deng JF, Johnston RJ et al. Evaluating willingness to pay for the temporal distribution of different air quality improvements: Is China’s clean air target adequate to ensure welfare maximization?[J]. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 67, 1-18(2018).

    [38] Duke JM, Borchers AM, Johnston RJ. Sustainable agricultural management contracts: Using choice experiments to estimate the benefits of land preservation and conservation practices[J]. Ecological Economics, 74, 95-103(2012).

    [39] Balli HO, S?rensen BE. Interaction effects in econometrics[J]. Empirical Economics, 45, 583-603(2013).

    [40] BramborT, Clark WR, GolderM. Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses[J]. Political Analysis, 14, 63-82(2006).

    Tao XU, Qi Ni, Dan Qiao, Liuyang YAO, Minjuan ZHAO. Distance effect on the willingness of rural residents to participate in watershed ecological restoration: Evidence from the Shiyang River Basin[J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(7): 1395
    Download Citation