Contribution of Different Lighting Environments to Sound-Light Fusion Effects

Jiaqi Ju; Ke Xu; Yue Wang; Jukun Liu; Yan Jin

doi:10.3788/LOP202259.0733003

Journals >Laser & Optoelectronics Progress >Volume 59 >Issue 7 >Page 0733003 > Article

Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
Vol. 59, Issue 7, 0733003 (2022)

Contribution of Different Lighting Environments to Sound-Light Fusion Effects

Jiaqi Ju, Ke Xu, Yue Wang, Jukun Liu, and Yan Jin^*

Author Affiliations

School of Science, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai 201418, China

show less

DOI: 10.3788/LOP202259.0733003 Cite this Article Set citation alerts

Jiaqi Ju, Ke Xu, Yue Wang, Jukun Liu, Yan Jin. Contribution of Different Lighting Environments to Sound-Light Fusion Effects[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(7): 0733003 Copy Citation Text

show less

Fig. 1. Experiment environment

Download full size

Fig. 2. Spectra of 5 experimental lighting

Download full size

Fig. 3. Excerpts of the music. (a) Major; (b) minor

Download full size

Fig. 4. Placement of electrodes. (a) HR; (b) RESP; (c) EDA

Download full size

Fig. 5. Overview of the experiment process

Download full size

Fig. 6. Two-dimensional graph of the emotional valence-arousal

Download full size

Environment		Fear	Sadness	Soothing	Happiness	Heroism
Music	major	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5
Music	minor	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5
Lighting	red	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5
	green	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5
	blue	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5
	white （3000 K）	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5
	white （6000 K）	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5

Table 1. Record sheet of the subjective emotions

Variable	Sum of squares	Degree of freedom	Mean square	F	Significant difference
Valence	52.796	6	8.799	7.419	0.000^***
Arousal	24.171	6	4.029	3.344	0.004^**

Table 2. ANOVA results under different music and lighting environments

Physiological parameter	Environment variable	Mean	T	Degree of freedom	Significant difference
HR	major	4.35	4.992	19	0.000^***
HR	minor	4.00	5.627	19	0.000^***
RESP	major	1.75	6.723	19	0.000^***
RESP	minor	2.00	3.183	19	0.005^**
EDA	major	2.31	4.188	19	0.000^***
EDA	minor	1.61	3.672	19	0.002^**

Table 3. Statistical analysis results of physiological parameters under different auditory conditions

Physiological parameter	Environment variable	Mean	T	Degree of freedom	Significant difference
HR	red	2.55	6.831	19	0.000^***
	green	2.90	5.966	19	0.000^***
	blue	3.70	5.230	19	0.000^***
	white （6000 K）	3.20	4.272	19	0.000^***
	white （3000 K）	4.05	3.803	19	0.001^**
RESP	red	-0.30	-0.468	19	0.645
	green	1.40	1.945	19	0.067
	blue	1.15	1.769	19	0.093
	white （6000 K）	2.00	2.538	19	0.020^*
	white （3000 K）	-0.88	-1.131	19	0.272
EDA	red	1.66	4.248	19	0.000^***
	green	1.30	4.299	19	0.000^***
	blue	1.45	3.676	19	0.002^**
	white （6000 K）	1.50	3.917	19	0.001^**
	white （3000 K）	1.86	4.134	19	0.001^**

Table 4. Statistical analysis results of physiological parameters under different visual conditions

Physiological parameter	Environment variable	Mean	T	Degree of freedom	Significant difference
HR	major+red	3.80	3.930	19	0.001^**
	major+green	4.30	4.729	19	0.000^***
	major+blue	4.85	5.585	19	0.000^***
	major+white （6000 K）	4.55	7.418	19	0.000^***
	major+white （3000 K）	3.05	4.686	19	0.000^***
	minor+red	2.85	5.284	19	0.000^***
	minor+green	4.50	5.142	19	0.000^***
	minor+blue	2.80	6.057	19	0.000^***
	minor+white （6000 K）	4.50	4.974	19	0.000^***
	minor+white （3000 K）	5.00	5.398	19	0.000^***
RESP	major+red	3.70	2.563	19	0.019^*
	major+green	1.70	2.138	19	0.046^*
	major+blue	-0.15	-0.178	19	0.860
	major+white （6000 K）	0.30	0.188	19	0.853
	major+white （3000 K）	0.65	0.933	19	0.363
	minor+red	2.40	4.366	19	0.000^***
	minor+green	2.10	2.666	19	0.015^*
	minor+blue	2.05	2.523	19	0.021^*
	minor+white （6000 K）	0.95	2.111	19	0.048^*
	minor+white （3000 K）	1.75	6.723	19	0.000^***
EDA	major+red	1.46	3.547	19	0.002^**
	major+green	1.33	3.550	19	0.002^**
	major+blue	1.05	3.215	19	0.005^**
	major+white （6000 K）	1.59	3.962	19	0.000^***
	major+white （3000 K）	1.25	3.559	19	0.002^**
	minor+red	0.61	2.976	19	0.008^**
	minor+green	0.87	2.630	19	0.017^*
	minor+blue	1.01	3.303	19	0.004^**
	minor+white （6000 K）	0.71	2.660	19	0.015^*
	minor+white （3000 K）	1.43	3.332	19	0.004^**

Table 5. Statistical analysis results of physiological parameters under dual-factor stimulation

Physiological parameter	Single-factor environment variable	Dual-factor environment variable	Mean	T	Degree of freedom	Significant difference
HR	blue	minor+blue	-2.40	-2.239	19	0.037^*
EDA	white （6000 K）	major+white （6000 K）	-0.91	-2.535	19	0.020^*
	red	minor+red	1.05	3.095	19	0.006^**
	white （6000 K）	minor+white （6000 K）	0.79	2.381	19	0.028^*

Table 6. Comparison of physiological parameters between light and two-factor environmental stimulus

Jiaqi Ju, Ke Xu, Yue Wang, Jukun Liu, Yan Jin. Contribution of Different Lighting Environments to Sound-Light Fusion Effects[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(7): 0733003

Download Citation

Set citation alerts for the article

Tools

Set citation alerts for the article

Save the article for my favorites

Paper Information