• Journal of Semiconductors
  • Vol. 42, Issue 12, 122002 (2021)
Xiaoshu Guo1 and Sandong Guo2
Author Affiliations
  • 1Xi'an University of Posts and Telecommunications, Xi'an 710121, China
  • 2School of Electronic Engineering, Xi'an University of Posts and Telecommunications, Xi'an 710121, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/12/122002 Cite this Article
    Xiaoshu Guo, Sandong Guo. Janus MSiGeN4 (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers derived from centrosymmetric β-MA2Z4: A first-principles study[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2021, 42(12): 122002 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    A two-dimensional (2D) MA2Z4 family with and phases has been attracting tremendous interest, the MoSi2N4 and WSi2N4 of which have been successfully fabricated ( Science 369, 670 (2020)). Janus monolayers have been achieved in many 2D families, so it is interesting to construct a Janus monolayer from the MA2Z4 family. In this work, Janus MSiGeN4 (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers are predicted from -MA2Z4, which exhibit dynamic, mechanical and thermal stabilities. It is found that they are indirect band-gap semiconductors by using generalized gradient approximation (GGA) plus spin-orbit coupling (SOC). With biaxial strain from 0.90 to 1.10, the energy band gap shows a nonmonotonic behavior due to a change of conduction band minimum (CBM). A semiconductor to metal transition can be induced by both compressive and tensile strains, and the phase transformation point is about 0.96 for compressive strain and 1.10 for tensile strain. The tensile strain can change the positions of CBM and valence band maximum (VBM), and can also induce the weak Rashba-type spin splitting near CBM. For MSiGeN4 (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers, both an in-plane and out-of-plane piezoelectric response can be produced, when a uniaxial strain in the basal plane is applied, which reveals the potential as piezoelectric 2D materials. The high absorption coefficients in the visible light region suggest that MSiGeN4 (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers have potential photocatalytic applications. Our works provide an idea to achieve a Janus structure from the MA2Z4 family, and can hopefully inspire further research exploring Janus MA2Z4 monolayers.

    1. Introduction

    Janus 2D monolayers have currently attracted increasing attention, which possess unique physical and chemical properties caused by their special crystal structure, such as strong Rashba spin splitting, the second harmonic generation response, and out-of-plane piezoelectric polarizations[1]. Experimentally, Janus monolayer MoSSe, which is constructed from MoS2/MoSe2, has been achieved by different experimental methods with an out-of-plane structural asymmetry[2, 3]. In theory, many Janus 2D materials have been predicted by the first-principle calculations[412], such as Janus transition metal chalcogenides (TMDs), Janus transition-metal oxides, PtSSe, Janus MA2Z4, TiXY (X/Y = S, Se and Te), VSSe, SnSSe and Janus group-III monochalcogenide M2XY (M = Ga, In; X/Y = S, Se and Te). Some unique properties have also been predicted, such as an out-of-plane piezoelectric coefficient[13, 14] and a significant Rashba spin splitting induced by intrinsic out-of-plane built-in electric field[10]. The Janus monolayer BiN and AsP field-effect transistors (FETs) possess sufficient competitiveness against other 2D FETs, which is confirmed by the benchmarking of the energy-delay product[15, 16].

    Recently, the high-quality 2D MoSi2N4 and WSi2N4 are successfully synthesized with excellent ambient stability by chemical vapor deposition (CVD)[17], which starts a new 2D material family. In the wake of MoSi2N4 and WSi2N4, twelve kinds of 2D family WSi2N4 are proposed with and ( = 1 to 6) phases by intercalating MoS2-type MZ2 monolayer into InSe-type A2Z2 monolayer[18]. The MA2Z4 with 32 or 34 valence electrons (VEC) are mostly semiconductors. Moreover, -WSi2P4 for the spin-valley polarization, -TaSi2N4 for Ising superconductor and -SrGa2Se4 for topological insulator are predicted[18]. And then, spin-valley polarization are also investigated in MoSi2N4, WSi2N4 and MoSi2As4[19, 20]. Intrinsic piezoelectricity of the MA2Z4 family along structure effect has been predicted by the first-principle calculations[21, 22]. Coexistence of intrinsic piezoelectricity and ferromagnetism induced by small biaxial strain in the septuple-atomic-layer VSi2P4 and VSi2N4 has been achieved, which offers the opportunities for achieving multifunctional electronic devices[23]. 2D van der Waals electrical contact to monolayer MoSi2N4 has been reported[24]. For example, the MoSi2N4/NbS2 contact exhibits an ultralow Schottky barrier height[24]. High intrinsic lattice thermal conductivity in monolayer MoSi2N4 has also been predicted by solving the phonon Boltzmann transport equation[25].

    It is very worthy of intensive study to construct a Janus monolayer from the MA2Z4 family. In our previous work, Janus MSiGeN4 (M = Mo and W) monolayers have been predicted from -MA2Z4[12]. The MSi2N4 and MGe2N4 (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers with a phase are semiconductors[18]. And then, in this work, Janus monolayer MSiGeN4 (M = Zr and Hf) are built by replacing the Si/Ge atoms of the top SiN/GeN bilayer in a MSi2N4/MGe2N4 monolayer with Ge/Si atoms. Their crystal stability, electronic structures, piezoelectric and optical properties are investigated by the first-principle calculations. Calculated results show that MSiGeN4 (M = Mo and W) monolayers are indirect gap semiconductors with dynamic, mechanical and thermal stabilities, and that tensile strain can induce weak Rashba-type spin splitting near CBM, and that MSiGeN4 (M = Mo and W) monolayers have observable piezoelectric response and high absorption coefficients in the visible light region.

    Table Infomation Is Not Enable

    2. Computational detail

    Within the density functional theory (DFT)[26], the projected augmented wave (PAW) method and GGA with the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerh (GGA-PBE) as the exchange-correlation functional are used, as implemented in the VASP code[2730]. It has been proved that GGA is more suitable for a gap of experimentally synthesized MoSi2N4 monolayer than HSE06[17]. So, we use GGA to study the electronic and optical properties of MSiGeN4 (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers. The SOC is included to investigate electronic structures of MSiGeN4 (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers. The plane-wave cutoff energy of 500 eV is used with a 16 × 16 × 1 k-mesh. We relax both the lattice constants and internal atomic positions until the maximal residual Hellmann–Feynman forces are less than 0.0001 eV/Å. We use the total energy as convergence criterion, which is set to eV. A vacuum space of larger than 30 Å is used to avoid interactions with other neighboring layers. After optimizing the crystal structure, 0.0001 eV/Å. We use the total energy as convergence criterion, which is set to with a supercell of 5 × 5 × 1, and the phonon dispersions of MSiGeN4 (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers are calculated by using the PHONOPY code[31]. The ab-initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations are performed with a supercell of size 4 × 4 × 1 for more than 3000 fs with a time step of 1 fs. The in-plane spin-textures are computed by using PYPROCAR code[32].

    The elastic stiffness tensor are calculated by using strain-stress relationship (SSR), and the piezoelectric stress coefficients are attained by density functional perturbation theory (DFPT) method[33]. A Monkhorst–Pack mesh of 16 × 16 × 1 is used to calculate , and 9 × 16 × 1 for . Due to 3D periodic boundary conditions, the 2D elastic coefficients and piezoelectric stress coefficients have been renormalized: = and = , where is the length of the unit cell along the z direction. It is noted that the calculated optical properties also depend on [34], which should be normalized by multiplying , where for the thickness of 2D material. However, the is not well defined like graphene. In this work, the = 35.8 Å is used as .

    3. Structure and stability

    The crystal structure of the Janus monolayer MSiGeN4 (M = Zr and Hf) is shown in Fig. 1 with the rhombus primitive cell and the rectangle supercell marked by black and red frames. With MN2 (M = Zr and Hf) triple layers sandwiched between the SiN and GeN bilayers, the symmetry of Janus monolayer MSiGeN4 (M = Zr and Hf) is lower than that of the MSi2N4 (M = Zr and Hf) or the MGe2N4 (M = Zr and Hf) monolayer due to the lack of the vertical reflection symmetry. In other words, Janus monolayer MSiGeN4 (M = Zr and Hf) can be built by replacing the Si/Ge atoms of the top SiN/GeN bilayer in the MSi2N4/MGe2N4 monolayer with Ge/Si atoms. We use GGA to optimize lattice constants of monolayer MSiGeN4 (M = Zr and Hf), and they are 3.110 and 3.097 Å, which are between the ones of MSi2N4 (3.05 and 3.19 Å) and MGe2N4 (3.04 and 3.18 Å)[18].

    (Color online) The crystal structures of (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers: (a) top view and (b) side view.

    Figure 1.(Color online) The crystal structures of (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers: (a) top view and (b) side view.

    The dynamical stability of monolayer MSiGeN4 (M = Zr and Hf) is studied by calculating their phonon band dispersions, which are shown in Fig. 2. It is clearly seen that the phonon branches are free from any imaginary frequencies, indicating the dynamical stability of these monolayers. They exhibit three acoustic and eighteen optical phonon branches due to seven atoms in the unit cell. In addition, the thermal stability is examined by AIMD simulations. During the simulations, the temperature is kept at 600 K, and the temperature and total energy fluctuations of only ZrSiGeN4 monolayer are plotted in Fig. 3 due to similar results between ZrSiGeN4 and HfSiGeN4. The crystal structures of ZrSiGeN4 at 600 K after the simulation for 3 ps are also plotted in Fig. 3. It is found that monolayer ZrSiGeN4 undergoes no structural reconstruction around 600 K, which indicates the thermal stability of these monolayers with the temperature and total energy fluctuating in the acceptable range.

    (Color online)The phonon dispersion curves of (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers with GGA.

    Figure 2.(Color online)The phonon dispersion curves of (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers with GGA.

    (Color online) (a) The fluctuations of temperature and total energy with the time obtained from MD simulation of monolayer at 600 K. (b, c) The snapshot of monolayer at the end of MD simulation at 600 K ((b): Top views, (c): Side views).

    Figure 3.(Color online) (a) The fluctuations of temperature and total energy with the time obtained from MD simulation of monolayer at 600 K. (b, c) The snapshot of monolayer at the end of MD simulation at 600 K ((b): Top views, (c): Side views).

    To verify the mechanical stability of MSiGeN4 (M = Zr and Hf), the investigation of the mechanical properties are carried out. Due to hexagonal symmetry, using Voigt notation, the elastic tensor can be expressed as:

    $C = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {{C_{11}}} & {{C_{12}}} & 0\\ {{C_{12}}} & {{C_{11}}} & 0\\ 0 & 0 & {({C_{11}} - {C_{12}})/2} \end{array}} \right). $ (1)

    The two independent elastic constants of ZrSiGeN4/HfSiGeN4 are = 403.92/465.93 N/m and = 110.58/135.19 N/m, and the = ( )/2 = 146.67 /165.37 N/m as shear modulus , which satisfy the Born criteria of mechanical stability[35]:

    $ C_{11}>0,\; \; C_{66}>0. $ (2)

    The 2D Young's moduli is given[35]:

    $ C_{\rm{2D}} = \frac{C_{11}^2-C_{12}^2}{C_{11}}. $ (3)

    The calculated is 373.65/426.71 N/m for monolayer ZrSiGeN4/HfSiGeN4, which are larger than ones of many 2D materials[13, 3638], indicating that these monolayers are rigid. However, they are smaller than ones of our predicted MSiGeN4 (M = Mo and W) monolayers[12]. The Poisson's ratio is also calculated by / , and they are 0.274/0.290 for monolayer ZrSiGeN4/HfSiGeN4.

    The MGe2N4 (M = Zr and Hf) has a lower formation energy than MSi2N4[18]. So, we calculate the cohesive energy ( ) of MSiGeN4 with respect to MGe2N4, which is defined as = + >, where and are the energies of the MSiGeN4 and MGe2N4 monolayers, and and are the energies of the isolated atoms of Si and Ge. The calculated is −1.85 eV/−1.90 eV for ZrSiGeN 4/HfSiGeN4 monolayer, which implies the feasibility of the experimental synthesis.

    Phonon band dispersion calculations, elastic constants and AIMD simulations reveal the dynamical, mechanical and thermal stabilities of predicted monolayers. Monolayer MSi2N4 (M = Mo and W) have been synthesized by introducing Si during CVD growth of M2N (M = Mo and W)[17]. We have proposed that the MSiGeN4 (M = Mo and W) monolayers can be achieved by introducing Si and Ge during CVD growth of M2N (M = Mo and W)[12]. The same way may be used to achieve the MSiGeN4 (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers.

    4. Electronic structure

    For Janus MSiGeN4 (M = Mo and W) monolayers, the SOC can produce important effects on their electronic structures, like Rashba spin splitting and valley polarization[12]. Thus, the SOC is considered to investigate electronic structures of MSiGeN4 (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers, and the corresponding energy bands without/with SOC are shown in Fig. 4. The results without/with SOC show that MSiGeN4 (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers are indirect gap semiconductors with VBM at the Γ point and CBM at the M point. The GGA gap of ZrSiGeN4 is 1.134, and 1.336 eV for HfSiGeN4. When including SOC, the gap of ZrSiGeN4/HfSiGeN4 reduces to 1.115 eV/1.282 eV. The SOC can also remove band degeneracy, and we take spin-orbit splitting (Δ) at VBM to illustrate the strength of SOC. The Δ is 35 meV/81 meV for ZrSiGeN4/HfSiGeN4, which means that the SOC has more strong effects on HfSiGeN4.

    (Color online) Band structures of (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers without/with SOC (GGA/GGA+SOC).

    Figure 4.(Color online) Band structures of (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers without/with SOC (GGA/GGA+SOC).

    Strain can be used to tune the physical and chemical properties of 2D materials[3941]. Here, we examine the biaxial strain effects on the electronic properties of MSiGeN4 (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers. The is used to simulate compressive/tensile strain with / 1$?>, where and are the strained and unstrained lattice constants, respectively. Due to similar dependence on strain for electronic structures of ZrSiGeN4 and HfSiGeN4, we only show energy bands of HfSiGeN4 as a function of in Fig. 5, and the the energy band gaps of MSiGeN4 (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers with from 0.90 to 1.10 are plotted in Fig. 6. With strain from 0.90 to 1.10, the gap of monolayer MSiGeN4 (M = Zr and Hf) firstly increases, and then decreases, which can be found in many 2D materials[12, 41]. In the considered strain range, it is found that both compressive and tensile strains can induce semiconductor to metal transition. The critical point is about 0.92 for compressive strain, and about 1.10 for tensile one. For MSiGeN4 (M = Mo and W) monolayers, no semiconductor to metal transition is observed in the same strain range[12]. Another difference is that the maximum of gap can be induced by compressive strain for MSiGeN4 (M = Mo and W)[12], and tensile strain for MSiGeN4 (M = Zr and Hf).

    (Color online) Band structures of monolayer with SOC (from 0.90 to 1.10).

    Figure 5.(Color online) Band structures of monolayer with SOC ( from 0.90 to 1.10).

    (Color online) The band gaps of (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers vs with SOC.

    Figure 6.(Color online) The band gaps of (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers vs with SOC.

    It is found that tensile strain can tune the positions of VBM and CBM of MSiGeN4 (M = Zr and Hf). Tensile strain can make CBM change from M point to Γ point, and VBM move from Γ point to one point along the M–K direction. These lead to that MSiGeN4 (M = Zr and Hf) change from an indirect gap semiconductor to a direct one to an indirect one. For example, a direct gap semiconductor can be observed at 1.04 strain. The Rashba-type spin splitting near the CBM can be induced by tensile strain. At 1.04 strain, the enlarged views of the conduction bands near the Fermi level for MSiGeN4 (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers using GGA+SOC are plotted in Fig. 7. It is clearly seen that a very weak Rashba-type spin splitting is produced. The constant energy 2D contour plots of spin texture of HfSiGeN4 as a representative centered at the Γ point are plotted in Fig. 8 at an energy surface of 1.5 eV above the Fermi level. The spin-up (red) and spin-down (blue) electronic bands can be distinctly observed, which shows the Rashba-type spin splitting. Due to the pure 2D Rashba spin splitting, the concentric spin-texture circles are observed. In the Rashba spin split bands, the only in-plane and spin components are observed with the lack of out-of-plane component. The tensile strain can tune the relative positions of valence band extrema (VBE), and can induce valence bands convergence, for example at = 1.06 point, which can produce an important influence on their electronic transport properties. However, the compressive strain produces small changes on electronic structures of MSiGeN4 (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers except for the energy band gap.

    The larger version around CBM for (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers with SOC at 1.04 strain.

    Figure 7.The larger version around CBM for (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers with SOC at 1.04 strain.

    (Color online) In-plane spin textures calculated at the iso-energy surface of 1.5 eV above the Fermi level for monolayer with red/blue colours being spin-up/spin-down states.

    Figure 8.(Color online) In-plane spin textures calculated at the iso-energy surface of 1.5 eV above the Fermi level for monolayer with red/blue colours being spin-up/spin-down states.

    5. Piezoelectric properties

    The -MSi2N4 or MGe2N4 (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers (No. 164) are centrosymmetric, which show no piezoelectricity. The MSiGeN4 (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers (No. 156) lack inversion symmetry, and a reflection symmetry with respect to the central M atomic layer is broken. This leads to both / and / being nonzero, and the piezoelectric stress and strain tensors become:

    $ e = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {{e_{11}}} & { - {e_{11}}} & 0\\ 0 & 0 & { - {e_{11}}}\\ {{e_{31}}} & {{e_{31}}} & 0 \end{array}} \right), $ (4)

    $ d = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {{d_{11}}} & { - {d_{11}}} & 0\\ 0 & 0 & { - 2{d_{11}}}\\ {{d_{31}}} & {{d_{31}}} & 0 \end{array}} \right). $ (5)

    For MSiGeN4 (M = Mo and W) monolayers, the same reduced piezoelectric stress and strain tensors can be attained[12], but the original -MSi2N4 or MGe2N4 (M = Mo and W) monolayers (No.187) lack inversion symmetry, and have vertical reflection symmetry, which gives rise to only in-plane piezoelectricity / . The two independent and are derived by :

    $ d_{11} = \frac{e_{11}}{C_{11}-C_{12}} ,\quad d_{31} = \frac{e_{31}}{C_{11}+C_{12}}. $ (6)

    We use nonprimitive orthorhombic supercells as the computational unit cell (in Fig. 1) to calculate the of MSiGeN4 (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers. Based on Eq. (6), their can be attained from previous calculated and . The calculated and of MSiGeN4 (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers are listed in Table 2, along with ones of MSiGeN4 (M = Mo and W) monolayers[12]. Calculated results show that the / of -MSiGeN4 (M = Zr and Hf) are lower than ones of -MSiGeN4 (M = Mo and W). Similar results can be found in Janus monolayer SnSSe and MoSSe[5]. The monolayer SnSSe is built from centrosymmetric monolayer or , while MoSSe can be attained from noncentrosymmetric or . And, the calculated / of SnSSe is lower than ones of MoSSe[5]. However, for both MSiGeN4 (M = Zr and Hf) and MSiGeN4 (M = Mo and W), their are very small.

    Table Infomation Is Not Enable

    6. Optical properties

    By calculating the complex dielectric function of MSiGeN4 (M = Mo and W) monolayers, their optical properties can be attained. The imaginary part of is determined by a summation over empty band states as follows[42]:

    $ \varepsilon_2(\omega) = \frac{2\pi e^2}{\Omega \epsilon_0}\sum\limits_{k,v,c}\delta(E^c_k-E^v_k-\hbar\omega)|<\psi^c_k|u.r|\psi^v_k>|^2, $ (7)

    where the vacuum dielectric constant, the volume and the energy of the incident phonon are marked by , and ; The and represent the momentum operator and the wave function at the k point; The v, and mean the valence bands, conduction bands and the polarization vector in the incident electric field. By the Kramers–Kronig relation, the real part can be calculated. According to the calculated and , the absorption coefficient can be expressed as[43]:

    $ \alpha(\omega) = \frac{\sqrt{2}\omega}{c}\left\{\left[\varepsilon_1^2(\omega)+\varepsilon_2^2(\omega)\right]^{1/2}-\varepsilon_1(\omega)\right\}^{\frac{1}{2}}. $ (8)

    Here, the rhombus primitive cell is used to calculate the optical properties of MSiGeN4 (M = Mo and W) monolayers. It is well known that the unit-cell volume of a 2D material is not well-defined, which leads to some calculated physical properties of a 2D material depending on the the length of the unit cell along the z direction, for example optical properties[34]. The and of MSiGeN4 (M = Mo and W) monolayers are calculated along xx/yy and zz directions, and are shown in Figs. 9 and 10. Because of hexagonal symmetry, the optical spectra between x and y directions are isotropic for light polarization along the in-plane directions. Due to similar energy band structures, it is clearly seen that the ZrSiGeN4 and HfSiGeN4 show very similar optical spectra. Due to distinct optical selection rules, there is a strong anisotropy in the optical spectra along xx/yy and zz directions. The static dielectric constants for ZrSiGeN4/HfSiGeN4 are 2.94/2.74 along xx/yy direction and 2.74/2.56 along zzdirection, which can be attained from the real part of the dielectric constant at zero energy. It is found that a sharp increase for at the first onset of the optical transitions between xx/yyand zzdirections is almost the same, and is at about 1.31 eV/1.71 eV for ZrSiGeN4/HfSiGeN4. From the ultraviolet to the visible light region, the calculated results imply that both xx/yyand zzdirections show strong absorption intensity with the absorption coefficient values being more than 104 cm−1 in the visible region, which means high efficiency in the utilization of solar energy. It is found that the absorption intensity along the xx/yydirection has more smaller changes than one along zzdirection in the visible light region, especially for ZrSiGeN4.

    (Color online) The calculated optical dielectric function of (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers with real parts (Left) and imaginary parts (Right) along xx/yy and directions.

    Figure 9.(Color online) The calculated optical dielectric function of (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers with real parts (Left) and imaginary parts (Right) along xx/yy and directions.

    (Color online) The optical absorption coefficients of (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers along xx/yyand zzdirections from 0 to 4 eV, and the visible light region (1.6–3.1 eV) is shown.

    Figure 10.(Color online) The optical absorption coefficients of (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers along xx/yyand zzdirections from 0 to 4 eV, and the visible light region (1.6–3.1 eV) is shown.

    7. Discussions and conclusion

    The Janus -MSiGeN4 (M = Mo and W) and -MSiGeN4 (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers have been predicted by the reliable first-principle calculations. In fact, our works provide an idea to achieve Janus structures from the MA2Z4 family, and many Janus MA2Z4 can be further investigated. For example, -MSiGeP4 (M = Cr, Mo and W) can be built, based on semiconducting MSi2P4 and MGe2P4 (M = Cr, Mo and W)[18]. In these Janus MA2Z4, both in-plane and out-of-plane piezoelectricity, Rashba-type spin splitting, valley polarization and second harmonic generation responses can be explored.

    In summary, the electronic structures, piezoelectric properties and optical properties of Janus MSiGeN4 (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers are systematically investigated by DFT. They exhibit mechanical, dynamic and thermal stabilities, and show indirect gap properties. It is found that strain can effectively tune their electronic structures, and can induce semiconductors to metal transition in the considered strain range. A very weak Rashba-type spin splitting near CBM can be induced by tensile strain. Both in-plane and out-of-plane piezoelectricity are predicted in MSiGeN4 (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers. The high absorption coefficients in the visible light region can be found along both xx/yy and zz directions. Our works can stimulate further experimental works to synthesize Janus MA2Z4 monolayers, and will motivate farther theoretical studies of other Janus MA2Z4, like -MSiGeP4 (M = Cr, Mo and W) monolayers.

    Acknowledgements

    This work is supported by Natural Science Basis Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (2021JM-456). We are grateful to the Advanced Analysis and Computation Center of China University of Mining and Technology (CUMT) for the award of CPU hours and WIEN2k/VASP software to accomplish this work.

    References

    [1] L Zhang, Z Yang, T Gong et al. Recent advances in emerging Janus two-dimensional materials: From fundamental physics to device applications. J Mater Chem A, 8, 8813(2020).

    [2] A Y Lu, H Y Zhu, J Xiao et al. Janus monolayers of transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat Nanotechnol, 12, 744(2017).

    [3] J Zhang, S Jia, I Kholmanov et al. Janus monolayer transition-metal dichalcogenides. ACS Nano, 11, 8192(2017).

    [4] S Singh, A H Romero. Giant tunable Rashba spin splitting in a two-dimensional BiSb monolayer and in BiSb/AlN heterostructures. Phys Rev B, 95, 165444(2017).

    [5] S D Guo, X S Guo, R Y Han et al. Predicted Janus SnSSe monolayer: A comprehensive first-principles study. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 21, 24620(2019).

    [6] Y D Guo, H B Zhang, H L Zeng et al. A progressive metal–semiconductor transition in two-faced Janus monolayer transition-metal chalcogenides. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 20, 21113(2018).

    [7] R Peng, Y D Ma, B B Huang et al. Two-dimensional Janus PtSSe for photocatalytic water splitting under the visible or infrared light. J Mater Chem A, 7, 603(2019).

    [8] A Mogulkoc, Y Mogulkoc, S Jahangirov et al. Characterization and stability of Janus TiXY (X/Y = S, Se, and Te) monolayers. J Phys Chem C, 123, 29922(2019).

    [9] C M Zhang, Y H Nie, S Sanvito et al. First-principles prediction of a room-temperature ferromagnetic Janus VSSe monolayer with piezoelectricity, ferroelasticity, and large valley polarization. Nano Lett, 19, 1366(2019).

    [10] Y C Cheng, Z Y Zhu, M Tahir et al. Spin-orbit–induced spin splittings in polar transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers. EPL, 102, 57001(2013).

    [11] M L Sun, Q Q Ren, S K Wang et al. Electronic properties of Janus silicene: New direct band gap semiconductors. J Phys D, 49, 445305(2016).

    [12] S D Guo, W Q Mu, Y T Zhu et al. Predicted septuple-atomic-layer Janus MSiGeN4 (M = Mo and W) monolayers with Rashba spin splitting and high electron carrier mobilities. J Mater Chem C, 9, 2464(2021).

    [13] L Dong, J Lou, V B Shenoy. Large in-plane and vertical piezoelectricity in Janus transition metal dichalchogenides. ACS Nano, 11, 8242(2017).

    [14] M Yagmurcukardes, C Sevik, F M Peeters. Electronic, vibrational, elastic, and piezoelectric properties of monolayer Janus MoSTe phases: A first-principles study. Phys Rev B, 100, 045415(2019).

    [15] W H Zhou, S L Zhang, S Y Guo et al. Designing sub-10-nm metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors via ballistic transport and disparate effective mass: The case of two-dimensional BiN. Phys Rev Appl, 13, 044066(2020).

    [16] W H Zhou, S L Zhang, Y Y Wang et al. Anisotropic in-plane ballistic transport in monolayer black arsenic- phosphorus FETs. Adv Electron Mater, 6, 1901281(2020).

    [17] Y L Hong, Z Liu, L Wang et al. Chemical vapor deposition of layered two-dimensional MoSi2N4 materials. Science, 369, 670(2020).

    [18] L Wang, Y P Shi, M F Liu et al. Intercalated architecture of MA2Z4 family layered van der Waals materials with emerging topological, magnetic and superconducting properties. Nat Commun, 12, 2361(2021).

    [19] S Li, W K Wu, X L Feng et al. Valley-dependent properties of monolayer MoSi2N4, WSi2N4, and MoSi2As4. Phys Rev B, 102, 235435(2020).

    [20] C Yang, Z G Song, X T Sun et al. Valley pseudospin in monolayer MoSi2N4 and MoSi2As4. Phys Rev B, 103, 035308(2021).

    [21] S D Guo, Y T Zhu, W Q Mu et al. Intrinsic piezoelectricity in monolayer MSi2N4 (M = Mo, W, Cr, Ti, Zr and Hf). EPL, 132, 57002(2020).

    [22] S D Guo, Y T Zhu, W Q Mu et al. Structure effect on intrinsic piezoelectricity in septuple-atomic-layer MSi2N4 (M = Mo and W). Comput Mater Sci, 188, 110223(2021).

    [23] S D Guo, W Q Mu, Y T Zhu et al. Coexistence of intrinsic piezoelectricity and ferromagnetism induced by small biaxial strain in septuple-atomic-layer VSi2P4. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 22, 28359(2020).

    [24] L M Cao, G H Zhou, Q Q Wang et al. Two-dimensional van der Waals electrical contact to monolayer MoSi2N4. Appl Phys Lett, 118, 013106(2021).

    [25] J H Yu, J Zhou, X G Wan et al. High intrinsic lattice thermal conductivity in monolayer MoSi2N4. New J Phys, 23, 033005(2021).

    [26] P Hohenberg, W Kohn. Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys Rev, 136, B864(1964).

    [27] G Kresse. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. J Non Cryst Solids, 192/193, 222(1995).

    [28] G Kresse, J Furthmüller. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput Mater Sci, 6, 15(1996).

    [29] G Kresse, D Joubert. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B, 59, 1758(1999).

    [30] J P Perdew, K Burke, M Ernzerhof. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett, 77, 3865(1996).

    [31] A Togo, F Oba, I Tanaka. First-principles calculations of the ferroelastic transition between rutile-type and CaCl2-type SiO2 at high pressures. Phys Rev B, 78, 134106(2008).

    [32] U Herath, P Tavadze, X He et al. PyProcar: A Python library for electronic structure pre/post-processing. Comput Phys Commun, 251, 107080(2020).

    [33] X F Wu, D Vanderbilt, D R Hamann. Systematic treatment of displacements, strains, and electric fields in density-functional perturbation theory. Phys Rev B, 72, 035105(2005).

    [34] G Y Guo, K C Chu, D S Wang et al. Linear and nonlinear optical properties of carbon nanotubes from first-principles calculations. Phys Rev B, 69, 205416(2004).

    [35] R C Andrew, R E Mapasha, A M Ukpong et al. Erratum: Mechanical properties of graphene and boronitrene [Phys. Rev. B 85, 125428 (2012)]. Phys Rev B, 69, 205416(2004).

    [36] M N Blonsky, H L Zhuang, A K Singh et al. Ab initio prediction of piezoelectricity in two-dimensional materials. ACS Nano, 9, 9885(2015).

    [37] R X Fei, W B Li, J Li et al. Giant piezoelectricity of monolayer group IV monochalcogenides: SnSe, SnS, GeSe, and GeS. Appl Phys Lett, 107, 173104(2015).

    [38] K A N Duerloo, M T Ong, E J Reed. Intrinsic piezoelectricity in two-dimensional materials. J Phys Chem Lett, 3, 2871(2012).

    [39] Z Q Fan, X W Jiang, Z M Wei et al. Tunable electronic structures of GeSe nanosheets and nanoribbons. J Phys Chem C, 121, 14373(2017).

    [40] X X Xue, Y X Feng, L Liao et al. Strain tuning of electronic properties of various dimension elemental tellurium with broken screw symmetry. J Phys: Condens Matter, 30, 125001(2018).

    [41] S D Guo, J Dong. Biaxial strain tuned electronic structures and power factor in Janus transition metal dichalchogenide monolayers. Semicond Sci Technol, 33, 085003(2018).

    [42] M Gajdoš, K Hummer, G Kresse et al. Linear optical properties in the projector-augmented wave methodology. Phys Rev B, 73, 045112(2006).

    [43] X Huang, T R Paudel, S Dong et al. Hexagonal rare-earth manganites as promising photovoltaics and light polarizers. Phys Rev B, 92, 125201(2015).

    Xiaoshu Guo, Sandong Guo. Janus MSiGeN4 (M = Zr and Hf) monolayers derived from centrosymmetric β-MA2Z4: A first-principles study[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2021, 42(12): 122002
    Download Citation