• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 39, Issue 3, 0311003 (2019)
Yang Gao1、2、*, Zhongliang Li2、*, Jianhua Zhang1, Nan Nan2, Xuan Wang2, and Xiangzhao Wang2
Author Affiliations
  • 1 School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
  • 2 Laboratory of Information Optics and Opto-Electronic Technology, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS201939.0311003 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Yang Gao, Zhongliang Li, Jianhua Zhang, Nan Nan, Xuan Wang, Xiangzhao Wang. Automatic Measurement Method for Corneal Thickness of Optical Coherence Tomography Images[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2019, 39(3): 0311003 Copy Citation Text show less
    Flow chart of proposed measurement method of corneal thickness
    Fig. 1. Flow chart of proposed measurement method of corneal thickness
    Noise and artifacts in original cornea B scan image
    Fig. 2. Noise and artifacts in original cornea B scan image
    A-scan averaged intensity curve
    Fig. 3. A-scan averaged intensity curve
    Average intensity curves of adjacent rows
    Fig. 4. Average intensity curves of adjacent rows
    Effect of corneal B-scan OCT images after pre-treatment. (a) Original corneal B-scan image; (b) corneal B-scan image with adaptive median-filtering; (c) corneal B-scan image with horizontal artifact removal; (d) corneal B-scan image with suppressed central artifact
    Fig. 5. Effect of corneal B-scan OCT images after pre-treatment. (a) Original corneal B-scan image; (b) corneal B-scan image with adaptive median-filtering; (c) corneal B-scan image with horizontal artifact removal; (d) corneal B-scan image with suppressed central artifact
    Boundary conditions. (a) Outer boundary condition; (b) hole boundary condition
    Fig. 6. Boundary conditions. (a) Outer boundary condition; (b) hole boundary condition
    Upper and lower edge fitting results of human corneal OCT B-scan image. (a) High quality original corneal B-scan image; (b) high quality edge fitting corneal B-scan image; (c) original corneal B-scan image with noise and artifacts; (d) edge fitting corneal B-scan image with noise and artifacts
    Fig. 7. Upper and lower edge fitting results of human corneal OCT B-scan image. (a) High quality original corneal B-scan image; (b) high quality edge fitting corneal B-scan image; (c) original corneal B-scan image with noise and artifacts; (d) edge fitting corneal B-scan image with noise and artifacts
    Fitting effects of upper and lower edges of human corneal B-scan images obtained by different pre-processing denoising algorithms. (a) No preprocessing denoising. (b) mean filter preprocessing; (c) median filter preprocessing; (d) adaptive median filter preprocessing
    Fig. 8. Fitting effects of upper and lower edges of human corneal B-scan images obtained by different pre-processing denoising algorithms. (a) No preprocessing denoising. (b) mean filter preprocessing; (c) median filter preprocessing; (d) adaptive median filter preprocessing
    Results of upper and lower edge fitting of OCT corneal images. (a) Edge detection and random sampling consistency method; (b) proposed method
    Fig. 9. Results of upper and lower edge fitting of OCT corneal images. (a) Edge detection and random sampling consistency method; (b) proposed method
    Algorithm typeTa±σ /μmTc±σ /μm
    High quality corneal B-scan image561.6±1.2571.6±2.9
    Corneal B-scan image with noise and artifacts562.1±2.3572.3±3.8
    Table 1. Average thickness, central thickness and corresponding standard deviations along Y-axis of corneal images with different qualities
    Preprocessing algorithmTa±σ /μmTc±σ /μm
    No preprocessing denoising567.2±5.1575.3±5.4
    Mean filter preprocessing563.1±4.4573.9±4.8
    Median filter preprocessing564.6±3.8573.2±4.5
    Adaptive median filter preprocessing562.1±2.3572.3±3.8
    Manual measurement561.4±1.4571.2±2.4
    Table 2. Average thickness, central thickness and corresponding standard deviations along Y-axis after treatments with different pretreatment algorithms
    Algorithm typeProposed algorithm (manual measurement)Random sampling consisitency (RANSC) algorithm (manual measurement)
    Ta±σ /μm1.0±0.32.3±1.8
    Tc±σ /μm1.2±0.65.2±3.9
    Table 3. Average thickness deviation, corneal center thickness deviation and corresponding standard deviations along Y-axis of corneal by different methods
    Yang Gao, Zhongliang Li, Jianhua Zhang, Nan Nan, Xuan Wang, Xiangzhao Wang. Automatic Measurement Method for Corneal Thickness of Optical Coherence Tomography Images[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2019, 39(3): 0311003
    Download Citation