Author Affiliations
1Guangxi Key Laboratory of Wireless Broadband Communication and Signal Processing, College of Information and Communication, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin,Guangxi 541004, China2Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Devices and Systems of Ministry of Education, College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518060, China3Guangdong and Hong Kong Joint Research Centre for Optical Fiber Sensors, College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518060, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Structural diagram of multilayered planar metal/dielectric ultra-broadband absorber
Fig. 2. Absorption spectra of 10-layered Zr/SiO2 absorber
Fig. 3. Optical properties of absorbers for different metal films. (a) Absorption spectra; (b) normalized impedance
Fig. 4. Relationship between each physical variable and wavelength. (a) Electric field intensity; (b) absorption intensity; (c) absorption efficiency of each metal layer
Fig. 5. Absorption spectra of absorbers with different film layer thicknesses. (a) h1; (b) h2; (c) h3; (d) h4; (e) h5; (f) h6; (g) h7; (h) h8
Fig. 6. Absorption spectra of absorbers with different film layer numbers
Fig. 7. Relationship between light absorption efficiency and incident angle under different polarization conditions. (a) TE polarization; (b) TM polarization
Fig. 8. Relationship between temperature rise and each parameter. (a) Temperature rise versus luminous intensity for different incident wavelengths; (b) temperature rise versus incident wavelength for different luminous intensities
Fig. 9. Absorption spectrum of absorber, normalized solar radiation spectrum and normalized radiation spectra of black body at different temperatures
Layer number | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 12 |
---|
h1 /nm | 229.9 | 215.0 | 136.7 | 130.8 | 130.3 | h2 /nm | 8.9 | 5.4 | 2.6 | 1.7 | 1.3 | h3 /nm | 222.6 | 128.4 | 115.9 | 111.4 | 108.4 | h4 /nm | 400.0 | 8.2 | 5.1 | 3.7 | 3.1 | h5 /nm | | 112.8 | 113.6 | 115.8 | 116.1 | h6 /nm | | 400.0 | 8.7 | 6.3 | 5.1 | h7 /nm | | | 111.2 | 114.3 | 117.1 | h8 /nm | | | 400.0 | 11.0 | 8.2 | h9 /nm | | | | 107.0 | 113.7 | h10 /nm | | | | 400.0 | 15.5 | h11 /nm | | | | | 102.3 | h12 /nm | | | | | 400.0 |
|
Table 1. Structural parameters for realizing highest average absorption efficiency of absorbers with different layer numbers in range of 0.4--3.0 μm
Layer number | 0.4--0.8 μm | 0.4--1.5 μm | 0.4--2.0 μm | 0.4--2.5 μm | 0.4--3.0 μm | 0.4--4.0 μm | 0.4--5.0 μm | 0.4--6.0 μm | 0.4--7.0 μm | 0.4--8.0 μm |
---|
4 | 99.5[21] | 95.9[23] | 93.8 | 92.0 | 91.5 | 88.0 | 84.9 | 81.9 | 79.1 | 74.9 | 6 | 99.6[24] | 99.0[25] | 98.7[26] | 97.3 | 95.5 | 94.6[27] | 92.9 | 91.3 | 88.7 | 86.8 | 8 | 99.8 | 99.1 | 98.8[28] | 98.7[15] | 97.9 | 96.7 | 95.7 | 94.5 | 93.1 | 90.6 | 10 | 99.8 | 99.1 | 98.9 | 98.7 | 98.6 | 97.7 | 96.8 | 96.1 | 94.4 | 92.5 | 12 | | | | | 98.6 | 98.2 | 97.2 | 96.9 | 95.7 | 93.8 | 14 | | | | | | 98.4 | 97.9 | 97.3 | 96.4 | 94.6 | 16 | | | | | | | 98.1 | 97.7 | 97.1 | 95.2 | 18 | | | | | | | 98.3 | 97.9 | 97.4 | 95.6 | 20 | | | | | | | | 97.9 | 97.6 | 96.0 | 22 | | | | | | | | | 97.7 | 96.2 | 24 | | | | | | | | | 97.8 | 96.4 |
|
Table 2. Relationship between optimal average absorption efficiency and layer number for each wavelength rangeunit: %
Temperature /K | | | ηT |
---|
273.15 | 0.972 | 0.001 | 0.972 | 1000 | 0.972 | 0.506 | 0.944 | 1300 | 0.972 | 0.629 | 0.870 | 1500 | 0.972 | 0.694 | 0.773 |
|