• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 9, Issue 3, 416 (2021)
Zachary N. Coker1、2, Xiao-Xuan Liang3, Allen S. Kiester4, Gary D. Noojin2, Joel N. Bixler4, Bennett L. Ibey4, Alfred Vogel3, and Vladislav V. Yakovlev1、5、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA
  • 2SAIC, Ft. Sam Houston, Texas 78234, USA
  • 3Institut für Biomedizinische Optik, Universität zu Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
  • 4Air Force Research Laboratory, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, Texas 78234, USA
  • 5Department of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.411980 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Zachary N. Coker, Xiao-Xuan Liang, Allen S. Kiester, Gary D. Noojin, Joel N. Bixler, Bennett L. Ibey, Alfred Vogel, Vladislav V. Yakovlev. Synergistic effect of picosecond optical and nanosecond electrical pulses on dielectric breakdown in aqueous solutions[J]. Photonics Research, 2021, 9(3): 416 Copy Citation Text show less
    Experimental design. (a) Tentative band structure of biological solution and plasma dynamics during the optoelectrical breakdown process. (b) Schematic representation of opto-electrical breakdown setup for bubble formation and detection with red indicating 1064 nm beam path and cyan indicating 485 nm probe beam path. Abbreviations indicate polarizing beam splitter cube (PBS), beam splitter (BS), pulse energy meter (E.M.), dichroic beam splitter (DBS), 750 nm short-pass filter (SPF), and photodiode (PD). Numbers 1 and 2 indicate respectively half-wave plates and 20×0.4 NA microscope objective. (c) Probit analysis curves and 95% confidence intervals of breakdown threshold (Eth) measurements across various biologically relevant sample solutions (MiliQ Milipore 18 MW · cm water, 0.1 M saline solution, DPBS, physiological imaging buffer, and D2O).
    Fig. 1. Experimental design. (a) Tentative band structure of biological solution and plasma dynamics during the optoelectrical breakdown process. (b) Schematic representation of opto-electrical breakdown setup for bubble formation and detection with red indicating 1064 nm beam path and cyan indicating 485 nm probe beam path. Abbreviations indicate polarizing beam splitter cube (PBS), beam splitter (BS), pulse energy meter (E.M.), dichroic beam splitter (DBS), 750 nm short-pass filter (SPF), and photodiode (PD). Numbers 1 and 2 indicate respectively half-wave plates and 20×0.4 NA microscope objective. (c) Probit analysis curves and 95% confidence intervals of breakdown threshold (Eth) measurements across various biologically relevant sample solutions (MiliQ Milipore 18 MW · cm water, 0.1 M saline solution, DPBS, physiological imaging buffer, and D2O).
    Pulse timing and threshold dependence. (a) nsEP electrical impulse trace (40 kV/cm) and relative timing between of psLP pulses to nsEP. (b) Probit analysis curves from respective time points and control validation.
    Fig. 2. Pulse timing and threshold dependence. (a) nsEP electrical impulse trace (40 kV/cm) and relative timing between of psLP pulses to nsEP. (b) Probit analysis curves from respective time points and control validation.
    Electro-optical breakdown modeling. (a) Plasma dynamics produced by Gaussian ps laser pulse (solid line) SFI contribution for book-keeping (dashed line); psLP profile (gray dash–dot). (b) Plasma dynamics produced by nsEP + psLP combination (solid), single 40 kV/cm nsEP (dash–dot), and single psLP (dashed line). Profiles of psLP and nsEP, their relative timing shown in gray dashed–dotted lines. (c) Visualized thought-experiment for breakdown threshold reduction: normalized irradiance as a function of seed electron density nseed in biological-relevant solutions. A simulated representation of a single psLP threshold based on different initial seed electron densities as provided by various nsEP intensities. Reference IpsLP=5.75×1015 W/m2, for nseed=102 cm−3, close to nimp in double distilled water.
    Fig. 3. Electro-optical breakdown modeling. (a) Plasma dynamics produced by Gaussian ps laser pulse (solid line) SFI contribution for book-keeping (dashed line); psLP profile (gray dash–dot). (b) Plasma dynamics produced by nsEP + psLP combination (solid), single 40 kV/cm nsEP (dash–dot), and single psLP (dashed line). Profiles of psLP and nsEP, their relative timing shown in gray dashed–dotted lines. (c) Visualized thought-experiment for breakdown threshold reduction: normalized irradiance as a function of seed electron density nseed in biological-relevant solutions. A simulated representation of a single psLP threshold based on different initial seed electron densities as provided by various nsEP intensities. Reference IpsLP=5.75×1015  W/m2, for nseed=102  cm3, close to nimp in double distilled water.
    Electric field and carrier density dependence. Probit analysis curves for reduction of Eth on (a) voltage dependence in DPBS biological solution and (b) donor carrier density in 0.1 M and 0.5 M saline solution with 9 kV/cm nsEP.
    Fig. 4. Electric field and carrier density dependence. Probit analysis curves for reduction of Eth on (a) voltage dependence in DPBS biological solution and (b) donor carrier density in 0.1 M and 0.5 M saline solution with 9 kV/cm nsEP.
    Zachary N. Coker, Xiao-Xuan Liang, Allen S. Kiester, Gary D. Noojin, Joel N. Bixler, Bennett L. Ibey, Alfred Vogel, Vladislav V. Yakovlev. Synergistic effect of picosecond optical and nanosecond electrical pulses on dielectric breakdown in aqueous solutions[J]. Photonics Research, 2021, 9(3): 416
    Download Citation