Zachary N. Coker, Xiao-Xuan Liang, Allen S. Kiester, Gary D. Noojin, Joel N. Bixler, Bennett L. Ibey, Alfred Vogel, Vladislav V. Yakovlev, "Synergistic effect of picosecond optical and nanosecond electrical pulses on dielectric breakdown in aqueous solutions," Photonics Res. 9, 416 (2021)

Search by keywords or author
- Photonics Research
- Vol. 9, Issue 3, 416 (2021)

Fig. 1. Experimental design. (a) Tentative band structure of biological solution and plasma dynamics during the optoelectrical breakdown process. (b) Schematic representation of opto-electrical breakdown setup for bubble formation and detection with red indicating 1064 nm beam path and cyan indicating 485 nm probe beam path. Abbreviations indicate polarizing beam splitter cube (PBS), beam splitter (BS), pulse energy meter (E.M.), dichroic beam splitter (DBS), 750 nm short-pass filter (SPF), and photodiode (PD). Numbers 1 and 2 indicate respectively half-wave plates and 20 × 0.4 NA microscope objective. (c) Probit analysis curves and 95% confidence intervals of breakdown threshold (E th ) measurements across various biologically relevant sample solutions (MiliQ Milipore 18 MW · cm water, 0.1 M saline solution, DPBS, physiological imaging buffer, and D 2 O ).

Fig. 2. Pulse timing and threshold dependence. (a) nsEP electrical impulse trace (40 kV/cm) and relative timing between of psLP pulses to nsEP. (b) Probit analysis curves from respective time points and control validation.

Fig. 3. Electro-optical breakdown modeling. (a) Plasma dynamics produced by Gaussian ps laser pulse (solid line) SFI contribution for book-keeping (dashed line); psLP profile (gray dash–dot). (b) Plasma dynamics produced by nsEP + psLP combination (solid), single 40 kV/cm nsEP (dash–dot), and single psLP (dashed line). Profiles of psLP and nsEP, their relative timing shown in gray dashed–dotted lines. (c) Visualized thought-experiment for breakdown threshold reduction: normalized irradiance as a function of seed electron density n seed in biological-relevant solutions. A simulated representation of a single psLP threshold based on different initial seed electron densities as provided by various nsEP intensities. Reference I psLP = 5.75 × 10 15 W / m 2 , for n seed = 10 2 cm − 3 , close to n imp in double distilled water.

Fig. 4. Electric field and carrier density dependence. Probit analysis curves for reduction of E th on (a) voltage dependence in DPBS biological solution and (b) donor carrier density in 0.1 M and 0.5 M saline solution with 9 kV/cm nsEP.

Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address