• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 55, Issue 11, 112801 (2018)
Dongmei Huang1, Jiheng Xu1, Wei Song1, Zhenhua Wang1, and Xiangfeng Liu2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1 College of Information Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
  • 2 Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200083, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP55.112801 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Dongmei Huang, Jiheng Xu, Wei Song, Zhenhua Wang, Xiangfeng Liu. Comparison and Analysis of Gaussian Decomposition and Gaussian Wavelet Decomposition for GLAS Full Waveform Data[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2018, 55(11): 112801 Copy Citation Text show less
    Diagram of GLAS original waveform
    Fig. 1. Diagram of GLAS original waveform
    Results of full waveform data processing. (a) Regularized waveform; (b) filtered waveform; (c) waveform after removing background noise
    Fig. 2. Results of full waveform data processing. (a) Regularized waveform; (b) filtered waveform; (c) waveform after removing background noise
    Schematic of Gaussian decomposition
    Fig. 3. Schematic of Gaussian decomposition
    Wavelet analysis diagrams at different scales
    Fig. 4. Wavelet analysis diagrams at different scales
    Laser foot point distributions of several typical ground objects. (a) Barren of flat area; (b) grassland of flat area; (c) buildings of town area; (d) woodland of flat area; (e) barren of slope area; (f) grassland of slope area; (g) terraces of hilly area; (h) woodland of slope area
    Fig. 5. Laser foot point distributions of several typical ground objects. (a) Barren of flat area; (b) grassland of flat area; (c) buildings of town area; (d) woodland of flat area; (e) barren of slope area; (f) grassland of slope area; (g) terraces of hilly area; (h) woodland of slope area
    Original echo waveforms of several typical ground objects. (a) Barren of flat area; (b) grassland of flat area; (c) buildings of town area; (d) woodland of flat area; (e) barren of slope area; (f) grassland of slope area; (g) terraces of hilly area; (h) woodland of slope area
    Fig. 6. Original echo waveforms of several typical ground objects. (a) Barren of flat area; (b) grassland of flat area; (c) buildings of town area; (d) woodland of flat area; (e) barren of slope area; (f) grassland of slope area; (g) terraces of hilly area; (h) woodland of slope area
    Pre-processed waveforms of several typical ground objects and fitting results of waveform component of Gaussian decomposition and Gaussian wavelet decomposition. (a) Barren of flat area; (b) grassland of flat area; (c) buildings of town area; (d) woodland of flat area; (e) barren of slope area; (f) grassland of slope area; (g) terraces of hilly area; (h) woodland of slope area
    Fig. 7. Pre-processed waveforms of several typical ground objects and fitting results of waveform component of Gaussian decomposition and Gaussian wavelet decomposition. (a) Barren of flat area; (b) grassland of flat area; (c) buildings of town area; (d) woodland of flat area; (e) barren of slope area; (f) grassland of slope area; (g) terraces of hilly area; (h) woodland of slope area
    Item(a) Flat area(e) Slope area
    GaussianGaussian waveletGaussianGaussian wavelet
    Best fit0.99960.99960.99840.9984
    Number of best fits661111
    A10.31790.31790.43050.4305
    t157.246857.246853.002053.0020
    σ15.03505.03505.57695.5769
    Table 1. Analysis and comparison of barren with Gaussian decomposition and Gaussian wavelet decomposition for the barren
    Item(b) Flat area(f) Slope area
    GaussianGaussian waveletGaussianGaussian wavelet
    Best fit0.99560.99560.98290.9829
    Number of best fits12131516
    A11.30811.30810.17220.1722
    t163.584263.584264.140364.1403
    σ17.33817.33817.70797.7079
    Table 2. Analysis and comparison of grassland with Gaussian decomposition and Gaussian wavelet decomposition for grassland
    Item(c) Buildings of town area(g) Terraces of hilly area
    GaussianGaussian waveletGaussianGaussian wavelet
    Best fit0.99810.99810.99200.9920
    Number of best fits772327
    A10.21020.21020.15430.1544
    t155.515755.515754.738254.7377
    σ15.31765.31762.31662.3157
    A20.51090.51090.08870.0881
    t2106.0804106.080473.169273.1642
    σ26.11926.119210.263010.2476
    A30.43960.4397
    t388.244388.2433
    σ34.58354.5835
    A40.18620.1862
    t4108.9126108.9099
    σ410.568310.5702
    Table 3. Analysis and comparison of buildings and terraces with Gaussian decomposition and Gaussian wavelet decomposition for buildings and terraces
    Item(d) Flat area(h) Slope area
    GaussianGaussian waveletGaussianGaussian wavelet
    Best fit0.99360.99360.96270.9620
    Number of best fits13151826
    A10.27030.27040.61790. 6175
    t131.167331.166337.246837.2567
    σ17.92967.929215.035015.0345
    A20.43860.43900.80810.8087
    t268.111768.111286.584286.5850
    σ28.52778.528020.338120.3371
    A30.69910.69960.83330.8335
    t382.495082.4948134.0692134.0696
    σ36.24676.246515.145015.1449
    A40.82170.82201.12651.1366
    t4108.0550108.0549171.9490171.9488
    σ410.479210.480018.125418.1256
    A50.94130.94100.85820.8588
    t5131.9899131.9901224.5302224.5348
    σ59.73869.738917.764917.7659
    A60.70400.70380.14920.1502
    t6166.1897166.1892246.1238246.1312
    σ611.845211.84475.12045.1219
    Table 4. Analysis and Comparison of woodland with Gaussian Decomposition and Gaussian Wavelet Decomposition for woodland
    Dongmei Huang, Jiheng Xu, Wei Song, Zhenhua Wang, Xiangfeng Liu. Comparison and Analysis of Gaussian Decomposition and Gaussian Wavelet Decomposition for GLAS Full Waveform Data[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2018, 55(11): 112801
    Download Citation