• Chinese Optics Letters
  • Vol. 19, Issue 5, 052601 (2021)
Chunhao Liang1, Yashar E. Monfared2, Xin Liu1, Baoxin Qi1, Fei Wang3、*, Olga Korotkova4、**, and Yangjian Cai1、3、***
Author Affiliations
  • 1Shandong Provincial Engineering and Technical Center of Light Manipulations & Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Optics and Photonic Device, School of Physics and Electronics, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China
  • 2Department of Chemistry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
  • 3School of Physical Science and Technology & Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China
  • 4Department of Physics, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida 33146, USA
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/COL202119.052601 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Chunhao Liang, Yashar E. Monfared, Xin Liu, Baoxin Qi, Fei Wang, Olga Korotkova, Yangjian Cai. Optimizing illumination’s complex coherence state for overcoming Rayleigh’s resolution limit[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2021, 19(5): 052601 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    We suggest tailoring of the illumination’s complex degree of coherence for imaging specific two- and three-point objects with resolution far exceeding the Rayleigh limit. We first derive a formula for the image intensity via the pseudo-mode decomposition and the fast Fourier transform valid for any partially coherent illumination (Schell-like, non-uniformly correlated, twisted) and then show how it can be used for numerical image manipulations. Further, for Schell-model sources, we show the improvement of the two- and three-point resolution to 20% and 40% of the classic Rayleigh distance, respectively.
    W0(r1,r2)=O*(r1)O(r2)W0(r1,r2).

    View in Article

    Wim(ρ1,ρ2)=W0(r1,r2)K*(r1,ρ1)K(r2,ρ2)d2r1d2r2,

    View in Article

    K(r,ρ)=1λ2f2P(ξ)exp[ikfξ·(r+ρ)]d2ξ,

    View in Article

    W0(r1,r2)=τ*(r1)τ(r2)p(v)H0*(v,r1)H0(v,r2)d2v,

    View in Article

    Sim(ρ)=d2vp(v)|τ(r)O(r)H0(v,r)K(r,ρ)d2r|2.

    View in Article

    Sim(ρ)=d2vp(v)|F(v,r)K(rρ)d2r|2=d2vp(v)|IFT[F˜1(v,f)K˜(f)]{ρ}|2,

    View in Article

    Sim(ρ)=iNjNp(vxi,vyj)M(vxi,vyj,ρ),

    View in Article

    Sim(ρ)=d2vp(v)|IFT[F˜1(fv)K˜(f)]{ρ}|2,

    View in Article

    O(r)=δ(xd/2,y)+δ(x+d/2,y)

    View in Article

    Sim(ρ)=exp(d2/8σ02)d2v×p(v){|S+|2+|S|2+2Re[S+S*μ(d,0)]},

    View in Article

    μ(Δr)=W(r1,r2)W(r1,r1)W(r2,r2)=d2vp(v)exp(2πiv·Δr)d2vp(v)

    View in Article

    S±=2πR2λ2f2J1[2πR(ρx±d/2)2+ρy2/λf]2πR(ρx±d/2)2+ρy2/λf,

    View in Article

    p(v)=ea2[(vxb/2)2+vy2]+ea2[(vx+b/2)2+vy2],

    View in Article

    μ(Δr)=eπ2Δr2/a2cos(πΔx/b),

    View in Article

    O1(r)=δ(x,yd/3)+δ(xd/2,y+3d/6)+δ(x+d/2,y+3d/6).

    View in Article

    Sim(ρ)=exp(d26σ2){|S1|2+|S2|2+|S3|2+2Re[S1S2*×μ(d2,3d2)+S1*S2μ(d2,3d2)+S2S3*μ(d,0)]},

    View in Article

    p(v)=ea2[(vx13b)2+vy2]+ea2[(vx+123b)2+(vy+12b)2]+ea2[(vx+123b)2+(vy12b)2].

    View in Article

    μ(Δr)=13eπ2Δr2a2[2cos(πΔyb)eiπΔx3b+ei2πΔx3b],

    View in Article

    Chunhao Liang, Yashar E. Monfared, Xin Liu, Baoxin Qi, Fei Wang, Olga Korotkova, Yangjian Cai. Optimizing illumination’s complex coherence state for overcoming Rayleigh’s resolution limit[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2021, 19(5): 052601
    Download Citation