• Chinese Journal of Lasers
  • Vol. 46, Issue 9, 904001 (2019)
Hu Jie, Yuan Qun, Yu Haobiao, Wang Shuai, Sun Yifeng, and Gao Zhishan*
Author Affiliations
  • School of Electronic and Optical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology,Nanjing, Jiangsu 210094, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/CJL201946.0904001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Hu Jie, Yuan Qun, Yu Haobiao, Wang Shuai, Sun Yifeng, Gao Zhishan. Assembly Error Tolerance of Interferometer Plate in Mirau Interference-Microscope Objective[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2019, 46(9): 904001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Interferometric imaging optical path of white light interferometer and Mirau interference-microscope objective
    Fig. 1. Interferometric imaging optical path of white light interferometer and Mirau interference-microscope objective
    Equivalent optical path of interference-microscope objective with titled reference plate. (a) Sectional optical path of interference- microscope objective; (b) top view of pupil plane in interference-microscope objective; (c) division of S region in pupil plane
    Fig. 2. Equivalent optical path of interference-microscope objective with titled reference plate. (a) Sectional optical path of interference- microscope objective; (b) top view of pupil plane in interference-microscope objective; (c) division of S region in pupil plane
    Relationship between tilt of reference plate θ and rotation angle α
    Fig. 3. Relationship between tilt of reference plate θ and rotation angle α
    Interferometric optical path with tilted reference plate
    Fig. 4. Interferometric optical path with tilted reference plate
    Spectral distribution of LED light source
    Fig. 5. Spectral distribution of LED light source
    Interference fringes under different tilts. (a) θ0=0°; (b) θ0=0.5°; (c) θ0=1°; (d) θ0=1.5°; (e) θ0=2°
    Fig. 6. Interference fringes under different tilts. (a) θ0=0°; (b) θ0=0.5°; (c) θ0=1°; (d) θ0=1.5°; (e) θ0=2°
    Comparison of morphology reconstruction results. (a) Primary morphology; (b) reconstruction errors under different tilts
    Fig. 7. Comparison of morphology reconstruction results. (a) Primary morphology; (b) reconstruction errors under different tilts
    Measured results of step. (a) Information of standard step; (b) measured results of standard step by Veeco NT9100 profilometer
    Fig. 8. Measured results of step. (a) Information of standard step; (b) measured results of standard step by Veeco NT9100 profilometer
    Interference fringes and envelope amplitudes corresponding to different tilts of reference plate. (a) θ0=0°; (b) θ0=0.5°; (c) θ0=1°; (d) θ0=1.5°; (e) θ0=2°
    Fig. 9. Interference fringes and envelope amplitudes corresponding to different tilts of reference plate. (a) θ0=0°; (b) θ0=0.5°; (c) θ0=1°; (d) θ0=1.5°; (e) θ0=2°
    θ0 /(°)Measured height value /nm
    090.58±3.28
    0.590.65±3.41
    190.72±3.56
    1.590.78±3.82
    291.02±4.86
    Table 1. Measured height values of standard step under different tilts
    Hu Jie, Yuan Qun, Yu Haobiao, Wang Shuai, Sun Yifeng, Gao Zhishan. Assembly Error Tolerance of Interferometer Plate in Mirau Interference-Microscope Objective[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2019, 46(9): 904001
    Download Citation