Author Affiliations
1School of Criminal Investigation, People's Public Security University of China, Beijing 100038, China2Institute of Solid State Physics, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, Anhui , Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Molecular structures of morphine, heroin, and codeine
Fig. 2. Experimental results. (a) Process of rapid detecting morphine in urine by LLME-SERS; (b) Raman spectra of morphine with different mass concentrations in urine
[36] Fig. 3. SERS spectra of morphine illegally added in chafing dish
[43] Fig. 4. Experimental results. (a) Schematic diagram of morphine analysis based on immunochromatography-SERS; (b) relationship curve between
B/
B0 value and morphine mass concentration (
B/
B0: intensity of peak at 1078 cm
-1 of the sample solution/the intensity of the peak at 1078 cm
-1 of the blank solution. Inset: corresponding immunochromatographic detection assay stripes); (c) specificity of morphine detected by ICA-SERS
[44] Fig. 5. Experimental results. (a) SERS spectrum obtained after wiping the surface containing 5 μg of heroin and performing lateral flow concentration; (b) heroin mass concentration curve obtained by measuring the peak intensity at 626 cm
-1 (inset: peak intensity at the low nanogram levels); SERS spectra of heroin and IR780 dye (c) before and (d) after chromatographic separation
[48-49] Fig. 6. Experimental results. (a) Schematic diagram of NaCl crystal-induced SERS platform and the distribution of effective laser spots; (b) SERS spectra of heroin with different mass concentrations collected at of 2 μm from the edge of NaCl crystal
[50] Fig. 7. Experimental results. (a) Photograph of the glass fiber sheet before (top) and after (bottom) loading Au nanoparticles, and a simple sampling rod (middle); (b) SERS spectra of codeine at 50, 25, 10, 5, 1, 0.5, 0.25, and 0.1 μg/mL; (c) photograph of the SERS flow-separation strip; SERS spectra of different mass concentrations of codeine in (d) saliva, (e) plasma, and (f) whole blood
[55-56] Detection method | Detection time | Sample pretreatment | Limit of detection | Ref. |
---|
Direct detection | 5-6 min | Liquid-liquid micro-extraction | 1 μg/mL | [36] | Direct detection | 160 sa | Ultraphonic, mixing, centrifugation and filtration | 0.1 μg/mL | [43] | Indirect detection | 25 min +10 sb | Centrifuged to remove precipitates | 2.4×10-4 ng/mL | [44] |
|
Table 1. Characteristics of three methods for detecting morphine in complex matrices
Analyte | Substrate | Matrix | SERS detection conditions | Limit of detection | Ref. |
---|
Laser wavelength /nm | Laser power /mW | Acquisition time /s |
---|
Morphine | Ag NPsa | - | 633 | 20 | 30 | - | [41] | Au NPs | - | 633 | 4 | 10 | (13±2) ng/mL | [42] | Au nanorods | Urine | 785 | 80%b | 15 | 1 μg/mL | [36] | Au NPs + hydrophobic slippery surface | Chafing dish | 785 | 30 | 20 | 0.1 μg/mL | [43] | MBA-Au-Abc | Saliva | 633 | 10 | 10 | 2.4×10-4 ng/mL | [44] | Heroin | Ag NPs + Chromatography paper | - | 785 | 17 | 1 | 9 ng | [48] | IR780 dye | 25 ng (in 0.5 mg of IR780) | [49] | Ag NPs + NaCl crystals | - | 633 | 0.13 | 5 | 1 μg/mL | [50] | PEG-SH-Au TNPsd + 3 M adhesive tape | Plasma | 785 | 20 | 16 | - | [52] | Heroin and its metabolites | Ag NPs + Au nanorod arrays | Saliva | 785 | 150 | 40 | Heroin: 31.69 ng/mL Morphine: 20.91 ng/mL Morphine-3-β-glucuronide: 17.01 ng/mL 6-Monoacetyl morphine: 19.91 ng/mL | [51] | Codeine | Ag NPsa | - | 633 | 20 | 30 | - | [41] | Ag NPs | Plasma | 633 | 3 | 20 | 416.12 ng/mL | [54] | Au NPs + glass fiber sheets | - | 785 | 40 | 3 | 5 ng/mL | [55] | Saliva, plasma, and whole blood | 70 ng/mL (saliva) 18 ng/mL (plasma) 244 ng/mL (whole blood) | [56] |
|
Table 2. Summary of research on the detection of classical opioids based on SERS in recent years