• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 57, Issue 23, 230901 (2020)
Li Yang1, Yuli Lou1、*, Chongguang Li1, Rende Wang1, Huaying Wang2, Zhao Dong2, Jinbin Gui1, Qinghe Song1, and Qingwei Liu1
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Laser Information Processing Technology and Application, College of Science, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan 650500, China
  • 2School of Mathematics & Physics Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan, Hebei 0 56038, China;
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP57.230901 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Li Yang, Yuli Lou, Chongguang Li, Rende Wang, Huaying Wang, Zhao Dong, Jinbin Gui, Qinghe Song, Qingwei Liu. Edge Extraction Technologies Based on an Optical Scanning Holographic System[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(23): 230901 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic of OSH system
    Fig. 1. Schematic of OSH system
    Experimental results of OSH system with annular pupil. (a) Original object; (b) transmittance distribution of annular pupil (ε=0.5); (c) reconstruction image of complex hologram; (d) normalized intensity of the position of the dotted line in Fig. 2 (c); (e) local normalized intensity
    Fig. 2. Experimental results of OSH system with annular pupil. (a) Original object; (b) transmittance distribution of annular pupil (ε=0.5); (c) reconstruction image of complex hologram; (d) normalized intensity of the position of the dotted line in Fig. 2 (c); (e) local normalized intensity
    Experimental results of OSH system using LG beam-axis cone lens pupil. (a) Transmittance distribution of LG beam-axis cone pupil (ε=0.5); (b) reconstruction image of complex hologram; (c) normalized intensity of the position of the dotted line in Fig. 3 (b); (d) local normalized intensity
    Fig. 3. Experimental results of OSH system using LG beam-axis cone lens pupil. (a) Transmittance distribution of LG beam-axis cone pupil (ε=0.5); (b) reconstruction image of complex hologram; (c) normalized intensity of the position of the dotted line in Fig. 3 (b); (d) local normalized intensity
    Reconstructed images and normalized intensity using LG beam-axis cone lens pupil with different aperture ratios. (a)(e) ε=0.3; (b)(f) ε=0.5; (c)(g) ε=0.7; (d)(h) ε=0.9
    Fig. 4. Reconstructed images and normalized intensity using LG beam-axis cone lens pupil with different aperture ratios. (a)(e) ε=0.3; (b)(f) ε=0.5; (c)(g) ε=0.7; (d)(h) ε=0.9
    Experimental results for a complex object (ε=0.5). (a) Original object; (b) reconstruction image of complex hologram; (c) reconstruction image in the vertical direction; (d) reconstruction image in the horizontal direction
    Fig. 5. Experimental results for a complex object (ε=0.5). (a) Original object; (b) reconstruction image of complex hologram; (c) reconstruction image in the vertical direction; (d) reconstruction image in the horizontal direction
    Reconstructed images and normalized intensity of a complex hologram using amplitude-type pupils with power function distribution under different powers. (a) Transmittance distribution of amplitude type pupil with power function distribution (n0=1); (b)(e) n0=1; (c)(f) n0=2; (d)(g) n0=3
    Fig. 6. Reconstructed images and normalized intensity of a complex hologram using amplitude-type pupils with power function distribution under different powers. (a) Transmittance distribution of amplitude type pupil with power function distribution (n0=1); (b)(e) n0=1; (c)(f) n0=2; (d)(g) n0=3
    Reconstructed images and normalized intensity using two kinds of pupils for the rectangular object. (a) Original object; (b)(c)(d) LG beam-axis cone lens pupil (ε=0.5); (e)(f)(g) amplitude type pupil with power function distribution (n0=1)
    Fig. 7. Reconstructed images and normalized intensity using two kinds of pupils for the rectangular object. (a) Original object; (b)(c)(d) LG beam-axis cone lens pupil (ε=0.5); (e)(f)(g) amplitude type pupil with power function distribution (n0=1)
    PupilMSEPSNR /dB
    Annular1994.1015.24
    LG beam-axis cone lens633.8620.11
    Table 1. Comparison of image quality after edge extraction using ring pupil and LG beam-axis cone lens pupil at the same aperture ratio (ε=0.5)
    Aperture ratioMSEPSNR /dB
    0.318392.165.48
    0.50.70.9633.861204.433063.2920.1117.3213.27
    Table 2. Comparison of image quality after edge extraction using LG beam-axis cone lens at different aperture ratios
    PowerMSEPSNR /dB
    1135.7926.80
    2255.6724.05
    3262.0823.95
    4280.3023.65
    5290.7223.50
    6296.0123.42
    Table 3. Comparison of image quality after edge extraction using amplitude type pupil with different power distributions
    PupilMSEPSNR /dB
    LG beam-axis cone125.7527.14
    Amplitude type21.2734.85
    Table 4. Comparison of image quality after edge extraction using LG beam-axis cone lens pupil (ε=0.5) and power function distribution amplitude type pupil (n0=1)
    Li Yang, Yuli Lou, Chongguang Li, Rende Wang, Huaying Wang, Zhao Dong, Jinbin Gui, Qinghe Song, Qingwei Liu. Edge Extraction Technologies Based on an Optical Scanning Holographic System[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(23): 230901
    Download Citation