Author Affiliations
1Key Laboratory of Laser Information Processing Technology and Application, College of Science, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan 650500, China2School of Mathematics & Physics Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan, Hebei 0 56038, China;show less
Fig. 1. Schematic of OSH system
Fig. 2. Experimental results of OSH system with annular pupil. (a) Original object; (b) transmittance distribution of annular pupil (ε=0.5); (c) reconstruction image of complex hologram; (d) normalized intensity of the position of the dotted line in Fig. 2 (c); (e) local normalized intensity
Fig. 3. Experimental results of OSH system using LG beam-axis cone lens pupil. (a) Transmittance distribution of LG beam-axis cone pupil (ε=0.5); (b) reconstruction image of complex hologram; (c) normalized intensity of the position of the dotted line in Fig. 3 (b); (d) local normalized intensity
Fig. 4. Reconstructed images and normalized intensity using LG beam-axis cone lens pupil with different aperture ratios. (a)(e) ε=0.3; (b)(f) ε=0.5; (c)(g) ε=0.7; (d)(h) ε=0.9
Fig. 5. Experimental results for a complex object (ε=0.5). (a) Original object; (b) reconstruction image of complex hologram; (c) reconstruction image in the vertical direction; (d) reconstruction image in the horizontal direction
Fig. 6. Reconstructed images and normalized intensity of a complex hologram using amplitude-type pupils with power function distribution under different powers. (a) Transmittance distribution of amplitude type pupil with power function distribution (n0=1); (b)(e) n0=1; (c)(f) n0=2; (d)(g) n0=3
Fig. 7. Reconstructed images and normalized intensity using two kinds of pupils for the rectangular object. (a) Original object; (b)(c)(d) LG beam-axis cone lens pupil (ε=0.5); (e)(f)(g) amplitude type pupil with power function distribution (n0=1)
Pupil | MSE | PSNR /dB |
---|
Annular | 1994.10 | 15.24 | LG beam-axis cone lens | 633.86 | 20.11 |
|
Table 1. Comparison of image quality after edge extraction using ring pupil and LG beam-axis cone lens pupil at the same aperture ratio (ε=0.5)
Aperture ratio | MSE | PSNR /dB |
---|
0.3 | 18392.16 | 5.48 | 0.50.70.9 | 633.861204.433063.29 | 20.1117.3213.27 |
|
Table 2. Comparison of image quality after edge extraction using LG beam-axis cone lens at different aperture ratios
Power | MSE | PSNR /dB |
---|
1 | 135.79 | 26.80 | 2 | 255.67 | 24.05 | 3 | 262.08 | 23.95 | 4 | 280.30 | 23.65 | 5 | 290.72 | 23.50 | 6 | 296.01 | 23.42 |
|
Table 3. Comparison of image quality after edge extraction using amplitude type pupil with different power distributions
Pupil | MSE | PSNR /dB |
---|
LG beam-axis cone | 125.75 | 27.14 | Amplitude type | 21.27 | 34.85 |
|
Table 4. Comparison of image quality after edge extraction using LG beam-axis cone lens pupil (ε=0.5) and power function distribution amplitude type pupil (n0=1)