• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 55, Issue 12, 121001 (2018)
Ziteng Shi, Zhiren Wang, Rui Wang, and Fuquan Ren*
Author Affiliations
  • College of Science, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, Hebei 066004, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP55.121001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Ziteng Shi, Zhiren Wang, Rui Wang, Fuquan Ren. Single Image Super-Resolution Based on Convolutional Neural Network[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2018, 55(12): 121001 Copy Citation Text show less
    SRCNN algorithm framework
    Fig. 1. SRCNN algorithm framework
    Proposed algorithm framework
    Fig. 2. Proposed algorithm framework
    Function schematic. (a) ReLU; (b) e-ReLU
    Fig. 3. Function schematic. (a) ReLU; (b) e-ReLU
    Graph of train loss in the proposed method with the increase of iterations in the training process
    Fig. 4. Graph of train loss in the proposed method with the increase of iterations in the training process
    Comparison of the reconstruction of the baby_GT in Set 5. (a) Original image; (b) BI/33.91 dB; (c) ScSR/34.29 dB; (d) SRCNN/34.83 dB; (e) SRCNN-Ex/34.91dB; (f) proposed method/35.04 dB
    Fig. 5. Comparison of the reconstruction of the baby_GT in Set 5. (a) Original image; (b) BI/33.91 dB; (c) ScSR/34.29 dB; (d) SRCNN/34.83 dB; (e) SRCNN-Ex/34.91dB; (f) proposed method/35.04 dB
    Comparison of the reconstruction of the butterfly_GT in Set 5. (a) Original image; (b) BI/24.04 dB; (c) ScSR/25.58 dB; (d) SRCNN/25.00 dB; (e) SRCNN-Ex/25.58 dB; (f) proposed method/27.91 dB
    Fig. 6. Comparison of the reconstruction of the butterfly_GT in Set 5. (a) Original image; (b) BI/24.04 dB; (c) ScSR/25.58 dB; (d) SRCNN/25.00 dB; (e) SRCNN-Ex/25.58 dB; (f) proposed method/27.91 dB
    Comparison of the reconstruction of the lenna in Set 14. (a) Original image; (b) BI/31.68 dB; (c) ScSR/32.64 dB; (d) SRCNN/32.53 dB; (e) SRCNN-Ex/32.78 dB; (f) proposed method/33.57 dB
    Fig. 7. Comparison of the reconstruction of the lenna in Set 14. (a) Original image; (b) BI/31.68 dB; (c) ScSR/32.64 dB; (d) SRCNN/32.53 dB; (e) SRCNN-Ex/32.78 dB; (f) proposed method/33.57 dB
    Comparison of the reconstruction of the pepper in Set 14. (a) Original image; (b) BI/32.38 dB; (c) ScSR/33.32 dB; (d) SRCNN/32.08 dB; (e) SRCNN-Ex/33.30 dB; (f) proposed method/34.57 dB
    Fig. 8. Comparison of the reconstruction of the pepper in Set 14. (a) Original image; (b) BI/32.38 dB; (c) ScSR/33.32 dB; (d) SRCNN/32.08 dB; (e) SRCNN-Ex/33.30 dB; (f) proposed method/34.57 dB
    Change graph of the average PSNR value for proposed algorithm in the Set 5 test set, with the number of iterations
    Fig. 9. Change graph of the average PSNR value for proposed algorithm in the Set 5 test set, with the number of iterations
    NameSizeNumberStridePadding
    Conv15×56410
    Conv23×33210
    Deconv9×9134
    Table 1. Parameter settings for each layer
    ImageBIScSRSRCNNSRCNN-ExProposed method
    PSNR /dBSSIMPSNR /dBSSIMPSNR /dBSSIMPSNR /dBSSIMPSNR /dBSSIM
    Baby33.910.9034.290.9234.830.9234.910.9235.040.92
    Bird32.570.9334.110.9233.770.9434.030.9435.460.95
    Butterfly24.040.8225.580.8225.000.8325.580.8427.910.91
    Head32.880.8033.170.8033.420.8233.420.8233.670.83
    Women28.560.8929.940.9129.600.9129.910.9131.220.93
    Average30.390.8731.420.8731.320.8831.570.8932.660.91
    Table 2. PSNR and SSIM values on Set 5 test set
    ImageBIScSRSRCNNSRCNN-ExProposed method
    PSNR /dBSSIMPSNR /dBSSIMPSNR /dBSSIMPSNR /dBSSIMPSNR /dBSSIM
    Baboon23.210.5423.500.5923.520.6023.540.6023.620.61
    Barbara26.250.7526.390.7526.760.7826.840.7826.570.78
    Bridge24.400.6524.800.7024.890.7024.950.7025.140.71
    Coastguard26.550.6127.000.6527.000.6627.080.6627.120.66
    Comic23.120.7023.900.7623.770.7523.870.7524.530.79
    Face32.820.8033.100.8133.380.8233.400.8233.710.83
    Flowers27.230.8028.250.8328.060.8328.270.8329.220.85
    Foreman31.160.9132.040.9132.090.9132.010.9133.650.94
    Lenna31.680.8632.640.8732.530.8732.780.8833.570.88
    Man27.010.7527.760.7827.560.7827.720.7828.330.80
    Monarch29.430.9230.710.9330.400.9330.870.9332.780.95
    Pepper32.380.8733.320.8732.080.8833.300.8834.570.89
    Ppt323.710.8724.980.8724.340.8825.020.8926.240.92
    Zebra26.630.8027.950.8227.740.8428.370.8429.110.85
    Table 3. PSNR and SSIM values on Set 14 test set
    Method1000 times iteration105 times iteration2×105 times iteration8×108 times iteration
    SRCNN477381600000
    SRCNN-Ex13921113600000
    Proposed method1411410028200
    Table 4. Comparison of training times
    Ziteng Shi, Zhiren Wang, Rui Wang, Fuquan Ren. Single Image Super-Resolution Based on Convolutional Neural Network[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2018, 55(12): 121001
    Download Citation