• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 39, Issue 3, 0312004 (2019)
Zejiang Meng1、2, Sikun Li1、2、*, Xiangzhao Wang1、2、*, Yang Bu1、2, and Chaoxing Yang1、2
Author Affiliations
  • 1 Laboratory of Information Optics and Opto-Electronic Technology, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China
  • 2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS201939.0312004 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Zejiang Meng, Sikun Li, Xiangzhao Wang, Yang Bu, Chaoxing Yang. Jones Pupil Measurement Method of Lithographic Projection Lens[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2019, 39(3): 0312004 Copy Citation Text show less
    Approximate polar decomposition of Jones matrix[12]
    Fig. 1. Approximate polar decomposition of Jones matrix[12]
    Pupil maps of OZP[13]
    Fig. 2. Pupil maps of OZP[13]
    Schematic of Jones pupil measurement device
    Fig. 3. Schematic of Jones pupil measurement device
    Original Jones pupil. (a) Diattenuation; (b) retardation
    Fig. 4. Original Jones pupil. (a) Diattenuation; (b) retardation
    OZP coefficients of original Jones pupil. (a) Diattenuation; (b) retardation
    Fig. 5. OZP coefficients of original Jones pupil. (a) Diattenuation; (b) retardation
    Measured Jones pupil by proposed method. (a) Diattenuation; (b) retardation
    Fig. 6. Measured Jones pupil by proposed method. (a) Diattenuation; (b) retardation
    Measured diattenuation of the proposed and the conventional method under different error settings. (a) Conventional method, without errors; (b) conventional method, with errors; (c) proposed method, without errors; (d) proposed method, with errors
    Fig. 7. Measured diattenuation of the proposed and the conventional method under different error settings. (a) Conventional method, without errors; (b) conventional method, with errors; (c) proposed method, without errors; (d) proposed method, with errors
    Amplitude errors of measured Jones pupil by proposed method. (a) Diattenuation; (b) retardation
    Fig. 8. Amplitude errors of measured Jones pupil by proposed method. (a) Diattenuation; (b) retardation
    OZP coefficient errors of measured Jones pupil by proposed method. (a) Diattenuation; (b) retardation
    Fig. 9. OZP coefficient errors of measured Jones pupil by proposed method. (a) Diattenuation; (b) retardation
    Error typeError sourceValue
    RandomNoise of image sensorσI)=0.003
    (Normal distribution)Orientation angle errorsσθ)=0.1°
    SystematicDiattenuation errorsη=0.01
    Retardation errorsδ=0.001π
    Table 1. Error sources in Jones pupil measurement device
    ConfigurationP1 angle θ1 /(°)Q1 angle ϕ1 /(°)Q2 angle ϕ2 /(°)P2 angle θ2 /(°)
    1×144×10°, 1.25°, 2.5°, …, 178.75°ϕ1
    4×4×9×10°, 45°, 90°, 135°0°, 45°, 90°, 135°0°, 12°, 24°, …, 180°
    4×4×4×40°, 45°, 90°, 135°0°, 45°, 90°, 135°0°, 45°, 90°, 135°0°, 45°, 90°, 135°
    Table 2. Three typical angle configurations
    ConfigurationMethodERMS-D /10-3ERMS-R /(10-3 rad)ERSS-OZP-D /10-3ERSS-OZP-R /10-3
    1×144×1Conventional method9.7710.807.278.70
    Proposed method2.312.982.015.13
    4×4×9×1Conventional method7.668.095.425.79
    Proposed method1.541.651.402.60
    Conventional method3.153.421.911.49
    4×4×4×4Proposed method0.840.700.730.79
    Raw Jones pupil50.0155.150.0154.6
    Table 3. Measurement errors comparison between the proposed and the conventional method under different angle configurations of polarization elements
    Zejiang Meng, Sikun Li, Xiangzhao Wang, Yang Bu, Chaoxing Yang. Jones Pupil Measurement Method of Lithographic Projection Lens[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2019, 39(3): 0312004
    Download Citation