• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 5, 0528001 (2021)
Hui Bai and Fengbao Yang*
Author Affiliations
  • College of Information and Communication Engineering, North University of China, Taiyuan , Shanxi 030051, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.0528001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Hui Bai, Fengbao Yang. LiDAR Data Classification Method Based on High Recognition Compound Derivative Feature[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(5): 0528001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Source feature images of airborne LiDAR data. (a) First echo height; (b) last echo height; (c) echo intensity
    Fig. 1. Source feature images of airborne LiDAR data. (a) First echo height; (b) last echo height; (c) echo intensity
    Derivative features of airborne LiDAR data. (a) Elevation difference; (b) NDVI; (c) GNDVI
    Fig. 2. Derivative features of airborne LiDAR data. (a) Elevation difference; (b) NDVI; (c) GNDVI
    Relationship between GNDVI and total chlorophyll concentration[10]
    Fig. 3. Relationship between GNDVI and total chlorophyll concentration[10]
    Ridge trust allocation function
    Fig. 4. Ridge trust allocation function
    GRNDVI value and classification accuracy change curve. (a) Curves of classification accuracy changes of buildings and roads; (b) curves of classification accuracy changes of trees and grasslands; (c) average classification accuracy
    Fig. 5. GRNDVI value and classification accuracy change curve. (a) Curves of classification accuracy changes of buildings and roads; (b) curves of classification accuracy changes of trees and grasslands; (c) average classification accuracy
    Classification results of different vegetation indexes based on fuzzy DS. (a) Visible light images; (b) artificial data; (c) classification results based on NDVI and fuzzy DS; (d) classification results based on GNDVI and fuzzy DS; (e) classification results based on GRNDVI and basic DS; (f) classification results based on GRNDVI and fuzzy DS
    Fig. 6. Classification results of different vegetation indexes based on fuzzy DS. (a) Visible light images; (b) artificial data; (c) classification results based on NDVI and fuzzy DS; (d) classification results based on GNDVI and fuzzy DS; (e) classification results based on GRNDVI and basic DS; (f) classification results based on GRNDVI and fuzzy DS
    FeatureClass
    AB
    HDT
    INT
    GRNDVI
    Table 1. Complementary sets of distinguishing features
    MethodVegetation index characteristicsOther featuresClassification method
    Method 1NDVIDSM、IN、HDFuzzy DS
    Method 2GNDVIDSM、IN、HDFuzzy DS
    Method 3GRNDVIDSM、IN、HDBasic DS
    Proposed methodGRNDVIDSM、IN、HDFuzzy DS
    Table 2. Comparison groups of different vegetation index characteristics experiments and different DS methods
    MethodBuildingTreeGrassRoadAverage value
    Method 10.82610.89230.88660.83600.8578
    Method 20.85060.87710.85220.89980.8688
    Method 30.87230.64430.79900.91980.8141
    Proposed method0.86200.89100.88640.90870.8920
    Table 3. Classification accuracy of data set 1
    MethodBuildingTreeGrassRoadAverage value
    Method 10.89320.73830.86790.81090.8413
    Method 20.89210.76030.88040.82720.8361
    Method 30.90700.71410.87710.83650.8442
    Proposed method0.90210.75370.88040.82380.8451
    Table 4. Classification accuracy of data set 2
    MethodBuildingTreeGrassRoadAverage value
    Method 10.87790.82400.85920.85660.8625
    Method 20.87570.84150.87110.87110.8598
    Method 30.87760.79780.86320.88980.8613
    Proposed method0.88740.86670.83440.86910.8737
    Table 5. Classification accuracy of data set 3
    MethodBuildingTreeGrassRoadAverage value
    Method 10.87870.78510.85350.86560.8570
    Method 20.88050.81400.86260.88240.8556
    Method 30.88110.76990.86020.89680.8560
    Proposed method0.88830.79980.86040.87910.8639
    Table 6. Classification accuracy of data set 4
    MethodBuildingTreeGrassRoadAverage value
    Method 10.89120.80250.87550.83020.8570
    Method 20.89340.81220.88490.84440.8577
    Method 30.90370.77140.87680.86150.8544
    Proposed method0.90160.80830.88660.84120.8631
    Table 7. Classification accuracy of data set 5
    Hui Bai, Fengbao Yang. LiDAR Data Classification Method Based on High Recognition Compound Derivative Feature[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(5): 0528001
    Download Citation