• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 38, Issue 4, 0411007 (2018)
Wei Wu1,*, Sen Lin2, and Weiqi Yuan3
Author Affiliations
  • 1 School of Information Engineering, Shenyang University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110041, China
  • 2 School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Huludao, Liaoning 125105, China
  • 3 Computer Vision Group, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang, Liaoning 110870, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS201838.0411007 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Wei Wu, Sen Lin, Weiqi Yuan. Palm Vein Recognition with Pseudo Image Storage[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2018, 38(4): 0411007 Copy Citation Text show less
    Traditional palm vein recognition system
    Fig. 1. Traditional palm vein recognition system
    Proposed palm vein recognition system with pseudo image storage
    Fig. 2. Proposed palm vein recognition system with pseudo image storage
    ROI extraction of palm vein image. (a) Original image; (b) location of ROI; (c) extracted ROI
    Fig. 3. ROI extraction of palm vein image. (a) Original image; (b) location of ROI; (c) extracted ROI
    Original images and blocked images in three databases. (a) Original image in PolyU database; (b) 2×2 block image in PolyU database; (c) 4×4 block image in PolyU database; (d) 8×8 block image in PolyU database; (e) original image in CASIA database; (f) 2×2 block image in CASIA database; (g) 4×4 block image in CASIA database; (h) 8×8 block image in CASIA database; (i) ROI of original image in self-built database; (j) 2×2 block image in self-built database; (k) 4×4 block image in self-built databas
    Fig. 4. Original images and blocked images in three databases. (a) Original image in PolyU database; (b) 2×2 block image in PolyU database; (c) 4×4 block image in PolyU database; (d) 8×8 block image in PolyU database; (e) original image in CASIA database; (f) 2×2 block image in CASIA database; (g) 4×4 block image in CASIA database; (h) 8×8 block image in CASIA database; (i) ROI of original image in self-built database; (j) 2×2 block image in self-built database; (k) 4×4 block image in self-built databas
    Conversion between encrypted and decrypted images. (a) 2×2 blocked ROI; (b) pseudo image; (c) decrypted image
    Fig. 5. Conversion between encrypted and decrypted images. (a) 2×2 blocked ROI; (b) pseudo image; (c) decrypted image
    Acquisition environment of PolyU database
    Fig. 6. Acquisition environment of PolyU database
    Acquisition environment of self-built database
    Fig. 7. Acquisition environment of self-built database
    ROIs of palm vein in different databases. (a) PolyU database; (b) CASIA database; (c) self-built database
    Fig. 8. ROIs of palm vein in different databases. (a) PolyU database; (b) CASIA database; (c) self-built database
    ROC curve of PolyU database
    Fig. 9. ROC curve of PolyU database
    ROC curve of CASIA database
    Fig. 10. ROC curve of CASIA database
    ROC curve of self-built database
    Fig. 11. ROC curve of self-built database
    Block sizeeEER /%
    PolyUCASIASelf-built
    2×21.97261.97211.4858
    4×41.97351.99002.0011
    Table 1. Equal error rate of proposed algorithm with sample size of 100
    Block sizeRecognition time /ms
    PolyUCASIASelf-built
    2×2736.9380759.2820777.7080
    4×4316.4700328.3020310.2900
    Table 2. Recognition time of proposed algorithm with sample size of 100
    Block sizeeEER /%
    PolyUCASIASelf-built
    2×20.41350.55770.4744
    4×41.19700.72870.5482
    Table 3. Equal error rate of proposed algorithm with sample size of 50
    Block sizeRecognition time /ms
    PolyUCASIASelf-built
    2×2325.0740316.0800322.6530
    4×4111.1410110.8110116.5530
    Table 4. Recognition time of proposed algorithm with sample size of 50
    AlgorithmeEER /%
    PolyUCASIASelf-built
    SIFT[20]3.689317.503817.5156
    2D Gabor[22]3.698119.06727.8250
    PCA+LPP[25]2.12184.22343.2750
    Grayscale surface[33]3.03956.61763.3866
    2DFLD2.96196.12523.6911
    Proposed algorithm0.41350.55760.4744
    Table 5. Equal error rate of proposed algorithm and other algorithms
    AlgorithmRecognition time /ms
    PolyUCASIASelf-built
    SIFT[20]80962.560172.558132.5
    2D Gabor[22]4432.54492.54462.5
    PCA+LPP[25]40882.539172.57582.5
    Grayscale surface[33]292.5263.5279.42
    2DFLD243.1938242.8062243.0606
    Proposed algorithm325.0740316.0800322.6530
    Table 6. Recognition time of proposed algorithm and other algorithms