• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 41, Issue 5, 0528001 (2021)
Wenqi Wang, Zongchun Li*, Yongjian Fu, Hua He, and Feng Xiong
Author Affiliations
  • Institute of Geospatial Information, PLA Strategic Support Force Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS202141.0528001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Wenqi Wang, Zongchun Li, Yongjian Fu, Hua He, Feng Xiong. Multi-Factor Segmentation of Point Cloud Based on Improved Multi-Rule Region Growing[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2021, 41(5): 0528001 Copy Citation Text show less
    An example of point cloud multi-factor segmentation based on traditional RG algorithm
    Fig. 1. An example of point cloud multi-factor segmentation based on traditional RG algorithm
    An example of point cloud multi-factor segmentation based on MRG algorithm
    Fig. 2. An example of point cloud multi-factor segmentation based on MRG algorithm
    An example of normal vector. (a) Point cloud; (b) normal vector of point cloud
    Fig. 3. An example of normal vector. (a) Point cloud; (b) normal vector of point cloud
    An example of linear and planar point set segmentation. (a) Linear point set; (b) planar point set
    Fig. 4. An example of linear and planar point set segmentation. (a) Linear point set; (b) planar point set
    Schematic diagram of threshold vt setting
    Fig. 5. Schematic diagram of threshold vt setting
    An example of volume change based on correct merging (ΔV=2.13). (a) Unmerged segments; (b) convex hulls of unmerged segments; (c) merged segment; (d) convex hull of merged segments
    Fig. 6. An example of volume change based on correct merging (ΔV=2.13). (a) Unmerged segments; (b) convex hulls of unmerged segments; (c) merged segment; (d) convex hull of merged segments
    An example of volume change based on incorrect merging (ΔV=17214.04). (a) Unmerged segments; (b) convex hulls of unmerged segments; (c) merged segment; (d) convex hull of merged segments
    Fig. 7. An example of volume change based on incorrect merging (ΔV=17214.04). (a) Unmerged segments; (b) convex hulls of unmerged segments; (c) merged segment; (d) convex hull of merged segments
    Pseudo-code of merge strategy
    Fig. 8. Pseudo-code of merge strategy
    Point cloud data set. (a) Airborne point cloud (scene I); (b) terrestrial point cloud (scene II); (c) vehicle-borne point cloud (scene III)
    Fig. 9. Point cloud data set. (a) Airborne point cloud (scene I); (b) terrestrial point cloud (scene II); (c) vehicle-borne point cloud (scene III)
    Reference data of each scene. (a) Scene I; (b) scene II; (c) scene III
    Fig. 10. Reference data of each scene. (a) Scene I; (b) scene II; (c) scene III
    Segmentation results of planar point set in Scene II and Scene III (Nt=15°). (a) MRG in Scene II; (b) IMRG in Scene II; (c) MRG in Scene III; (d) IMRG in Scene III
    Fig. 11. Segmentation results of planar point set in Scene II and Scene III (Nt=15°). (a) MRG in Scene II; (b) IMRG in Scene II; (c) MRG in Scene III; (d) IMRG in Scene III
    Incorrect segmentation. (a) RG+mean shift; (b) CSF+DBSCAN; (c) GMIC
    Fig. 12. Incorrect segmentation. (a) RG+mean shift; (b) CSF+DBSCAN; (c) GMIC
    MethodTPFP
    RG+mean shift35170829669
    CSF+DBSCAN36459434771
    IMRG34050238946
    Table 1. 1 Segmentation results of ground in Scene I
    MethodNt /(°)P /%R /%F1 /%
    Scene IScene IIScene IIIScene IScene IIScene IIIScene IScene IIScene III
    597.3899.2399.4084.9699.0699.1490.7599.1599.27
    MRG1097.3299.4099.3477.8097.4175.8086.4798.4085.99
    1593.8072.3899.4168.0999.9034.5678.9183.9451.29
    597.5699.3399.4587.6899.0099.2592.3599.1699.35
    IMRG1097.5099.4199.5290.9498.9688.1294.1199.1993.48
    1597.2399.4399.3889.9196.9164.5093.4398.1678.23
    Table 1. Segmentation evaluation of building plane in each scene
    MethodF1 /%Time /s
    Building planGroundVegetationCar
    Method 198.5698.1998.4193.89954.01
    Method 297.5298.6997.0192.721750.89
    Method 393.0896.1889.5882.651218.09
    Method 499.0198.7198.9095.39987.68
    Method 591.9296.1089.4779.115922.04
    Table 1. 0 F1 score of segmentation in Scene III
    MethodNt /(°)P /%R /%F1 /%
    Scene IScene IIScene IIIScene IScene IIScene IIIScene IScene IIScene III
    588.4197.6498.6187.8798.0999.0388.1497.8798.82
    MRG1085.7893.7784.4290.6598.5599.3188.1596.1091.26
    1583.0993.6567.0590.553.6699.5486.667.0580.13
    590.1197.5198.7586.2398.3499.0788.1397.9298.91
    IMRG1089.8597.3991.5089.8198.5699.3189.8397.9795.25
    1589.2792.6678.9990.5898.6399.4589.9295.5588.05
    Table 2. Segmentation evaluation of ground in each scene
    Scenedt /mst /mVt
    Scene I1.540.4018.71
    Scene II0.250.0516.33
    Scene III0.130.0314.61
    Table 3. Merge threshold parameters
    Type of ground objectBuilding planGroundVegetation
    P /%89.7087.5391.77
    Strategy① (M=1150)R /%80.5087.9292.14
    F1 /%84.8587.7291.96
    P /%96.4489.7492.99
    Strategy② (M=1515)R /%90.4389.1994.14
    F1 /%93.3489.4693.56
    Table 4. Merge results in Scene I
    Type of ground objectBuilding planGroundVegetationPower line
    P /%97.6791.1599.7895.72
    Strategy①(M=1550)R /%96.2297.2596.4760.97
    F1 /%96.9494.1098.1074.49
    P /%99.3897.4299.7899.40
    Strategy②(M=2730)R /%98.9798.4599.7998.36
    F1 /%99.1797.9499.7998.88
    Table 5. Merge results in Scene II
    Type of ground objectBuilding planGroundVegetationCar
    P /%97.0998.3098.7594.67
    Strategy①(M=1673)R /%98.6598.1896.4094.14
    F1 /%97.8698.2497.5694.41
    P /%98.9698.7299.0195.35
    Strategy②(M=2386)R /%99.0798.7198.7995.44
    F1 /%99.0198.7198.9095.39
    Table 6. Merge results in Scene III
    SceneCSFDBSCAN
    lc /mhc /mrd /mmd
    Scene I0.80.525
    Scene II20.40.510
    Scene III20.50.530
    Table 7. Parameters for Method 4
    MethodF1 /%Time /s
    BuildingplanGroundVegetation
    Method 176.8485.0390.62294.03
    Method 292.9992.1794.714697.64
    Method 383.7093.3594.423230.18
    Method 493.3489.4693.56372.53
    Table 8. F1 score of segmentation in Scene I
    MethodF1 /%Time /s
    Building planGroundVegetationPower line
    Method 197.0094.5697.5354.95499.06
    Method 298.9497.5798.7493.61943.72
    Method 398.6497.5199.1979.061523.06
    Method 499.1797.9499.7998.88830.65
    Method 597.9095.7196.3678.594627.44
    Table 9. F1 score of segmentation in Scene II
    Wenqi Wang, Zongchun Li, Yongjian Fu, Hua He, Feng Xiong. Multi-Factor Segmentation of Point Cloud Based on Improved Multi-Rule Region Growing[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2021, 41(5): 0528001
    Download Citation