Author Affiliations
Information System Engineering College, Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450002, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Diagram of effect of X-ray on single scattering point
Fig. 2. Scattering correction process flow chart
Fig. 3. Schematic of scattering point setting
Fig. 4. Schematic diagram of simulation system
Fig. 5. Scattering proportion distributions of simple model. (a) Produced by point; (b) produced by line; (c) produced by plane
Fig. 6. Reconstructions of aluminum cylinder. (a) Scattering distribution produced by the aluminum cylinder; (b) result without scattering correction; (c) result with scattering correction; (d) profile of CT values on the red line in Fig. 6 (b)-Fig. 6 (c)
Fig. 7. Projection distributions under different T values. (a) Projection without correction; (b) projection at T=0.3125; (c) projection at T=0.6583; (d) projection at T=0.9470
Fig. 8. Contrast diagrams of correction effect. (a) Correction with BSA; (b) correction with proposed method; (c) CT value in center location with BSA; (d) CT value in center location with proposed method
Fig. 9. Reconstructions of industrial components. (a) Result without scattering correction; (b) result with scattering correction; (c) another layer of image results without correction; (d) another layer of image results with correction; (e) and (f) local magnified images of Fig. 9(c) and Fig. 9(d), respectively; (g) profiles of CT values on the red line in Fig. 9(a) and Fig. 9(b)
Correction | CNR | Contrast | σ | Tcup/% |
---|
Without scattering correction | 3.937 | 25.348 | 20.560 | 21.429 | With scattering correction | 6.077 | 41.902 | 24.212 | 5.063 |
|
Table 1. Quantitative analysis of aluminium cylinder
Correction | CNR | Contrast | σ | Tcup /% |
---|
Without scattering correction | 7.3551 | 3.3065 | 95.5630 | 18.5762 | With scattering correction | 9.3989 | 5.0955 | 119.5141 | 8.6453 |
|
Table 2. Quantitative analysis of the industrial component