Fig. 1. REFLET goniophotometer. (a) Integral structure; (b) optical table and darkroom
Fig. 2. Test samples. (a) 2024 aluminum alloy, R=0.8 μm; (b) 2024 aluminum alloy, R=6.3 μm; (c) 2024 aluminum alloy, R=50 μm; (d) cement plate; (e) aluminum plate blasted with brown corundum
Fig. 3. Measurement results of the BRDF of samples. (a) 2024 aluminum alloy, R=0.8 μm; (b) 2024 aluminum alloy, R=6.3 μm; (c) 2024 aluminum alloy, R=50 μm; (d) cement plate, PTFE, aluminum plate blasted with brown corundum (θi=0°)
Fig. 4. BRDF model fitting results and experimental measurement results of 2024 aluminum alloy sample with R=6.3 μm
Fig. 5. BRDF model fitting results and experimental measurement results of material samples with rough surface
2024 aluminum alloys ample | kb | kd | kr | a | b | E(x) /% |
---|
R=0.8 μm | 20.066 | 0.075 | 1.376 | 0.479 | -64.439 | 6.08 | R=6.3 μm | 17.695 | 0.003 | 2.704 | 0.537 | -46.122 | 2.38 | R=50 μm | 7.526 | 0.155 | 1.229 | 0.689 | -58.648 | 3.19 |
|
Table 1. Modeling results of 2024 aluminum alloy sample with different roughnesses
Sample | a | b | E(x) /% |
---|
PTFE | 0.982 | 1.004 | 1.43 | CEMENT | 0.282 | 0.985 | 1.16 | BROWN | 0.419 | 1.190 | 1.30 |
|
Table 2. Modeling results of material samples with rough surface
Sample | Algorithm | kb | kd | kr | a | b | E(x) /% | Time /s |
---|
2024aluminum alloy(R=6.3 μm) | GA | 18.951 | 0.143 | 1.532 | 0.630 | -63.265 | 4.52 | 933 | PSO | 15.958 | 0.611 | 5.894 | 0.557 | -50.354 | 4.61 | 679 | SAPSO | 17.695 | 0.003 | 2.704 | 0.537 | -46.122 | 2.38 | 696 | BROWN | GA | - | - | - | 0.428 | 1.103 | 1.45 | 598 | PSO | - | - | - | 0.435 | 1.211 | 1.51 | 404 | SAPSO | - | - | - | 0.419 | 1.190 | 1.30 | 427 |
|
Table 3. Modeling results of different optimization algorithms