• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 9, Issue 2, 213 (2021)
Xiongbin Wang1、2、†, Qiushi Wang3、†, Yulong Chen1、4、†, Jiagen Li5, Ruikun Pan3, Xing Cheng4, Kar Wei Ng1, Xi Zhu5, Tingchao He6、7、*, Jiaji Cheng3、8、*, Zikang Tang1、9、*, and Rui Chen2、10、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Institute of Applied Physics and Materials Engineering, University of Macau, Avenida da Universidade, Taipa, Macau 999078, China
  • 2Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
  • 3School of Materials Science and Engineering, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China
  • 4Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
  • 5Shenzhen Institute of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics for Society (AIRS), Shenzhen 518172, China
  • 6College of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
  • 7e-mail: tche@szu.edu.cn
  • 8e-mail: jiajicheng@hubu.edu.cn
  • 9e-mail: zktang@um.edu.mo
  • 10e-mail: chenr@sustech.edu.cn
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.413592 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Xiongbin Wang, Qiushi Wang, Yulong Chen, Jiagen Li, Ruikun Pan, Xing Cheng, Kar Wei Ng, Xi Zhu, Tingchao He, Jiaji Cheng, Zikang Tang, Rui Chen. Metal-to-ligand charge transfer chirality-based sensing of mercury ions[J]. Photonics Research, 2021, 9(2): 213 Copy Citation Text show less
    Illustration of the synthesis process of chiral Cys-MoO2 NPs and their application for Hg2+ sensing.
    Fig. 1. Illustration of the synthesis process of chiral Cys-MoO2 NPs and their application for Hg2+ sensing.
    (a) TEM image of D-Cys-MoO2 NPs. The corresponding scale bar is 100 nm. (b) Histogram distribution of the diameter of NPs. Measurements of (c) circular dichroism spectrum and (d) absorption spectrum of MoO3 (black line), L-Cys-MoO2 (red line), and D-Cys-MoO2 NPs (blue line). XPS spectra of (e) MoO3 NPs and (f) D-Cys-MoO2 NPs with deconvoluted molybdenum 3d peaks. The blue and orange peak areas are corresponding to the different valence states of Mo(VI) and Mo(IV), respectively.
    Fig. 2. (a) TEM image of D-Cys-MoO2 NPs. The corresponding scale bar is 100 nm. (b) Histogram distribution of the diameter of NPs. Measurements of (c) circular dichroism spectrum and (d) absorption spectrum of MoO3 (black line), L-Cys-MoO2 (red line), and D-Cys-MoO2 NPs (blue line). XPS spectra of (e) MoO3 NPs and (f) D-Cys-MoO2 NPs with deconvoluted molybdenum 3d peaks. The blue and orange peak areas are corresponding to the different valence states of Mo(VI) and Mo(IV), respectively.
    Chiroptical sensing of Hg2+ using Cys-MoO2 NPs. (a) CD and (b) absorption measurements for Hg2+ mixing with aqueous D-Cys-MoO2 and L-Cys-MoO2 NPs solution. The concentration of Hg2+ in the mixture varied from 0.1 nM to 30 nM. (c) Calculated g-factor curves of specimens in (a). (d) Differences of g-factor [values at 384 nm shown in (c)] versus Hg2+ concentration and corresponding fitting curve. The inset image is the calibration plot.
    Fig. 3. Chiroptical sensing of Hg2+ using Cys-MoO2 NPs. (a) CD and (b) absorption measurements for Hg2+ mixing with aqueous D-Cys-MoO2 and L-Cys-MoO2 NPs solution. The concentration of Hg2+ in the mixture varied from 0.1 nM to 30 nM. (c) Calculated g-factor curves of specimens in (a). (d) Differences of g-factor [values at 384 nm shown in (c)] versus Hg2+ concentration and corresponding fitting curve. The inset image is the calibration plot.
    (a) TGA curves of L-Cys-MoO2 NPs with different amounts of mercury after dialysis. (b) Ligand density varies with mercury ion concentrations. (c) CD and (d) absorption spectra of pure L-Cys-MoO2 NPs as well as L-Cys-MoO2 mixing with Hg2+ (10 nM in the mixture) under different reaction times.
    Fig. 4. (a) TGA curves of L-Cys-MoO2 NPs with different amounts of mercury after dialysis. (b) Ligand density varies with mercury ion concentrations. (c) CD and (d) absorption spectra of pure L-Cys-MoO2 NPs as well as L-Cys-MoO2 mixing with Hg2+ (10 nM in the mixture) under different reaction times.
    TD-DFT simulation for different amounts of D-Cys capped Mo4O8 nanoclusters. Calculated frontier molecular orbital of (a), (c) HOMO and (b), (d) LUMO for one Cys molecule capped and six Cys molecule capped Mo4O8 nanoclusters. Calculated (e) CD spectra and (f) absorption spectra.
    Fig. 5. TD-DFT simulation for different amounts of D-Cys capped Mo4O8 nanoclusters. Calculated frontier molecular orbital of (a), (c) HOMO and (b), (d) LUMO for one Cys molecule capped and six Cys molecule capped Mo4O8 nanoclusters. Calculated (e) CD spectra and (f) absorption spectra.
    Selectivity of D-Cys-MoO2-based Hg2+ sensor. (a) CD spectra of D-Cys-MoO2 solution mixed with different heavy metal ions: Zn2+, Cd2+, Pb2+, Ag+, Cu2+, and Hg2+. (b) CD signal at 384 nm of mixtures measured in (a). The concentrations of all metal ions are settled at 10 nM.
    Fig. 6. Selectivity of D-Cys-MoO2-based Hg2+ sensor. (a) CD spectra of D-Cys-MoO2 solution mixed with different heavy metal ions: Zn2+, Cd2+, Pb2+, Ag+, Cu2+, and Hg2+. (b) CD signal at 384 nm of mixtures measured in (a). The concentrations of all metal ions are settled at 10 nM.
    MethodsSystemDetection Range (nM)LOD (nM)Ref.
    SERSAu NPs/rGO/SiO2/Si0.1–60000.1[42]
    Au TNAs/graphene/Au NPs1–45,0008.3[43]
    4-MPY-Ag NPs1–1000.34[44]
    AbsorptionDNA-Au NPs0–5000500[45]
    N-T-Au NPs50–2500.8[46]
    Hcy-SH0–100072[47]
    PLAPBA-MoS25–41,0001.8[48]
    N-doped-CNDs0–300,00080[49]
    DNA-SWNTs50–800014.5[50]
    ElectrochemistryHNTs-Fe3O4-MnO22.5–7501[51]
    MSO-Au NPs0–1000.5[52]
    DNA-Fc1–20000.5[53]
    CDDNA-Au NRs0.25–500.15[54]
    Ag-L-Cys NPs0–10009[55]
    D-Cys-MoO2NPs0.1–300.08This work
    L-Cys-MoO2NPs0.1–300.12This work
    Table 1. Comparison of the Proposed Probe with Previously Reported Hg2+ Sensors Based on Different Methodsa
    Hg2+ Concentration (nM)Mass Loss (%)Ligand Density (nm2)
    013.117.96
    0.112.416.86
    111.815.94
    511.415.33
    1010.914.57
    3010.113.38
    Table 2. Summary of Calculated Mass Loss and Ligand Density for L-Cys-MoO2 NPs with Different Hg2+ Additions
    Xiongbin Wang, Qiushi Wang, Yulong Chen, Jiagen Li, Ruikun Pan, Xing Cheng, Kar Wei Ng, Xi Zhu, Tingchao He, Jiaji Cheng, Zikang Tang, Rui Chen. Metal-to-ligand charge transfer chirality-based sensing of mercury ions[J]. Photonics Research, 2021, 9(2): 213
    Download Citation