Fig. 1. Schematic of forming principle and comparison of surface morphology. (a) Schematic of forming principle; (b)--(d) confocal surface morphologies corresponding to B=0, 200, 400 mT, respectively; (e)--(g) macroscopic surface morphologies corresponding to B=0, 200, 400 mT, respectively
Fig. 2. Comparison of microstructure under three magnetic fields. (a)--(c) Top, middle, and bottom of cladding layer when B=0 mT; (d)--(f) top, middle, and bottom of cladding layer when B=200 mT; (g)--(i) top, middle, and bottom of cladding layer when B=400 mT
Fig. 3. XRD and microhardness. (a) XRD pattern of cladding layer; (b) microhardness distribution curve
Fig. 4. Friction and wear experiment. (a) Friction coefficient; (b) mass loss; (c)--(e) wear morphology under B=0, 200, 400 mT, respectively
Fig. 5. Potentiodynamic polarization curve
Parameter | Hardness/HV | Density/(g·cm-3) | Tensile strength/MPa | Yield strength/MPa | Elongation/% | Thermal expansion coefficient/(10-6 ℃) | Elastic modulus/GPa |
---|
Value | ≤210 | 7.98 | ≥480 | ≥177 | 30 | 16 | 200 |
|
Table 1. Performance parameters of 316L stainless steel substrate
Parameter | B=0 mT | B=200 mT | B=400 mT |
---|
Icorr/ (A·cm-2) | 4.57×10-7 | 3.77×10-7 | 3.31×10-7 | Ecorr/V | -0.86 | -0.64 | -0.51 |
|
Table 2. Electrochemical corrosion parameters of three cladding layers