Fig. 1. Description of optical surface based on cartesian coordinate system
Fig. 2. Profiles of different surface types in yoz plane corresponding to different values of k
Fig. 3. Off-axis conic base surface defined with off-axis angle
[20] Fig. 4. Schematic diagram of ASAS
Fig. 5. Ultra-thin reflective imaging system
[16]. (a) Optical layout of initial system using even aspheric surface; (b) optical layout of system using ASAS; (c) MTF curves of system using ASAS
Fig. 6. Catadioptric ultra-wide-angle imaging system
[73]. (a) Optical layout of system; (b) MTF curves of system using even aspheric surface; (c) MTF curves of system using ASAS; (d) MTF curves of system after fitting ASAS to even aspheric surface
Fig. 7. Profile of APS in yoz plane
Fig. 8. Ultra-short throw ratio projection objective using APS
[18]. (a) Layout of system; (b) distortion grid of system; (c) MTF curves of system
Fig. 9. Schematic diagram of SSPS
[22] Fig. 10. Off-axis system with two mirrors and three reflections
[22]. (a) Optical layout of system; (b) design result using traditional
xy polynomial surface; (c) design result using SSPS; (d) RMS wavefront error of system using traditional
xy polynomial surface; (e) RMS wavefront error of system using SSPS; (f) MTF curves of system using SSPS; (g) distorted grids of system using SSPS
Fig. 11. Off-axis system with three mirrors and four reflections
[22]. (a) Optical layout of system; (b) design result using traditional
xy polynomial surface; (c) design result using SSPS; (d) RMS wavefront error of system using traditional
xy polynomial surface; (e) RMS wavefront error of system using SSPS
Fig. 12. Description of first-order data of system using freeform surface
[76]. (a) Optical layout of freeform prism; (b) optical layout of system using best-fitting double-curvature biconic surface; (c) Gaussian curvature distribution of best-fitting conic surface of S
3; (d) Gaussian curvature distribution of best-fitting double-curvature biconic surface of S
3 Fig. 13. Fitting error diagram of
xy polynomial surface of double-curvature biconic surface converted into
xy polynomial surface by different methods
[76]. (a) Least squares method; (b) singular value decomposition method; (c)
xy polynomial surface of double-curvature biconic surface is directly converted into
x-a
xy polynomial surface; (d) converted
x-a
xy polynomial
surface is further optimized into
xy polynomial surface
Fig. 14. Schematic diagrams of Alvarez system. (a)(d) System is equivalent to negative lens and diverges beam; (b)(e) initial statement of system can be designed as parallel glass plate state or with initial optical power; (c)(f) system is equivalent to positive lens and converges beam
Fig. 15. Optimized Alvarez system. (a) Theoretical optical power P is -10 m-1; (b) theoretical optical power P is -4 m-1;(c) theoretical optical power P is 2 m-1
Fig. 16. Optical power and astigmatism distributions of single lens in optimized Alvarez system. (a) Distribution of optical power; (b) distribution of astigmatism
Fig. 17. Off-axis conic surface
[63]. (a) Off-axis ellipsoid; (b) off-axis hyperboloid
Fig. 18. Optical properties of conic mirrors
[19] Fig. 19. Ideal imaging off-axis three-mirror system using focus transfer
[19]. (a) Paraboloid-ellipsoid-ellipsoid; (b) paraboloid-hyperboloid-ellipsoid
Fig. 20. Design process of compact off-axis three-mirror system
[19]. (a) Optical layout of initial system using CBS; (b) RMS spot diagram of initial system; (c) optical layout of design using CBR; (d) RMS wavefront error of system using CBR; (e) optical layout of design result using CBN; (f) RMS wavefront error of system using CBN; (g) RMS wavefront error of system after CBNs are converted to traditional
xy polynomial surfaces
Fig. 21. Process of integrating two surfaces into single surface
[21]. (a) Coordinates and the normals of sampling points from two original surfaces; (b) local coordinate system of base sphere and freeform surface; (c) freeform surface is obtained by fitting based on the normal of discrete points and residual
Fig. 22. NURBS surface fitted with Peaks surface based on MBA algorithm
[15]. (a) Peaks surface to be fitted; (b) result of 3rd fitting; (c) result of 4th fitting; (d) result of 5th fitting
Fig. 23. Schematic diagram of ray tracing process
[15] Inverse 3000 random point | Total time /s | Average time /s |
---|
Minimal distance algorithm(with fixed initial value) | 3.7925 | 0.001264 | Ray tracing algorithm(with fixed initial value) | 1.1137 | 0.000371 | Minimal distance algorithm(with estimated initial value) | 3.0793 | 0.001026 | Ray tracing algorithm(with estimated initial value) | 0.8954 | 0.000298 |
|
Table 1. NURBS inversion algorithm's efficiency
[15]