• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 43, Issue 8, 0822008 (2023)
Dewen Cheng*, Hailong Chen, Yongtian Wang, and Tong Yang
Author Affiliations
  • School of Optics and Photonics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS221980 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Dewen Cheng, Hailong Chen, Yongtian Wang, Tong Yang. Mathematical Description and Design Methods of Complex Optical Surfaces[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2023, 43(8): 0822008 Copy Citation Text show less
    Description of optical surface based on cartesian coordinate system
    Fig. 1. Description of optical surface based on cartesian coordinate system
    Profiles of different surface types in yoz plane corresponding to different values of k
    Fig. 2. Profiles of different surface types in yoz plane corresponding to different values of k
    Off-axis conic base surface defined with off-axis angle[20]
    Fig. 3. Off-axis conic base surface defined with off-axis angle[20]
    Schematic diagram of ASAS
    Fig. 4. Schematic diagram of ASAS
    Ultra-thin reflective imaging system[16]. (a) Optical layout of initial system using even aspheric surface; (b) optical layout of system using ASAS; (c) MTF curves of system using ASAS
    Fig. 5. Ultra-thin reflective imaging system[16]. (a) Optical layout of initial system using even aspheric surface; (b) optical layout of system using ASAS; (c) MTF curves of system using ASAS
    Catadioptric ultra-wide-angle imaging system[73]. (a) Optical layout of system; (b) MTF curves of system using even aspheric surface; (c) MTF curves of system using ASAS; (d) MTF curves of system after fitting ASAS to even aspheric surface
    Fig. 6. Catadioptric ultra-wide-angle imaging system[73]. (a) Optical layout of system; (b) MTF curves of system using even aspheric surface; (c) MTF curves of system using ASAS; (d) MTF curves of system after fitting ASAS to even aspheric surface
    Profile of APS in yoz plane
    Fig. 7. Profile of APS in yoz plane
    Ultra-short throw ratio projection objective using APS[18]. (a) Layout of system; (b) distortion grid of system; (c) MTF curves of system
    Fig. 8. Ultra-short throw ratio projection objective using APS[18]. (a) Layout of system; (b) distortion grid of system; (c) MTF curves of system
    Schematic diagram of SSPS[22]
    Fig. 9. Schematic diagram of SSPS[22]
    Off-axis system with two mirrors and three reflections[22]. (a) Optical layout of system; (b) design result using traditional xy polynomial surface; (c) design result using SSPS; (d) RMS wavefront error of system using traditional xy polynomial surface; (e) RMS wavefront error of system using SSPS; (f) MTF curves of system using SSPS; (g) distorted grids of system using SSPS
    Fig. 10. Off-axis system with two mirrors and three reflections[22]. (a) Optical layout of system; (b) design result using traditional xy polynomial surface; (c) design result using SSPS; (d) RMS wavefront error of system using traditional xy polynomial surface; (e) RMS wavefront error of system using SSPS; (f) MTF curves of system using SSPS; (g) distorted grids of system using SSPS
    Off-axis system with three mirrors and four reflections[22]. (a) Optical layout of system; (b) design result using traditional xy polynomial surface; (c) design result using SSPS; (d) RMS wavefront error of system using traditional xy polynomial surface; (e) RMS wavefront error of system using SSPS
    Fig. 11. Off-axis system with three mirrors and four reflections[22]. (a) Optical layout of system; (b) design result using traditional xy polynomial surface; (c) design result using SSPS; (d) RMS wavefront error of system using traditional xy polynomial surface; (e) RMS wavefront error of system using SSPS
    Description of first-order data of system using freeform surface[76]. (a) Optical layout of freeform prism; (b) optical layout of system using best-fitting double-curvature biconic surface; (c) Gaussian curvature distribution of best-fitting conic surface of S3; (d) Gaussian curvature distribution of best-fitting double-curvature biconic surface of S3
    Fig. 12. Description of first-order data of system using freeform surface[76]. (a) Optical layout of freeform prism; (b) optical layout of system using best-fitting double-curvature biconic surface; (c) Gaussian curvature distribution of best-fitting conic surface of S3; (d) Gaussian curvature distribution of best-fitting double-curvature biconic surface of S3
    Fitting error diagram of xy polynomial surface of double-curvature biconic surface converted into xy polynomial surface by different methods[76]. (a) Least squares method; (b) singular value decomposition method; (c) xy polynomial surface of double-curvature biconic surface is directly converted into x-axy polynomial surface; (d) converted x-axy polynomialsurface is further optimized into xy polynomial surface
    Fig. 13. Fitting error diagram of xy polynomial surface of double-curvature biconic surface converted into xy polynomial surface by different methods[76]. (a) Least squares method; (b) singular value decomposition method; (c) xy polynomial surface of double-curvature biconic surface is directly converted into x-axy polynomial surface; (d) converted x-axy polynomialsurface is further optimized into xy polynomial surface
    Schematic diagrams of Alvarez system. (a)(d) System is equivalent to negative lens and diverges beam; (b)(e) initial statement of system can be designed as parallel glass plate state or with initial optical power; (c)(f) system is equivalent to positive lens and converges beam
    Fig. 14. Schematic diagrams of Alvarez system. (a)(d) System is equivalent to negative lens and diverges beam; (b)(e) initial statement of system can be designed as parallel glass plate state or with initial optical power; (c)(f) system is equivalent to positive lens and converges beam
    Optimized Alvarez system. (a) Theoretical optical power P is -10 m-1; (b) theoretical optical power P is -4 m-1;(c) theoretical optical power P is 2 m-1
    Fig. 15. Optimized Alvarez system. (a) Theoretical optical power P is -10 m-1; (b) theoretical optical power P is -4 m-1;(c) theoretical optical power P is 2 m-1
    Optical power and astigmatism distributions of single lens in optimized Alvarez system. (a) Distribution of optical power; (b) distribution of astigmatism
    Fig. 16. Optical power and astigmatism distributions of single lens in optimized Alvarez system. (a) Distribution of optical power; (b) distribution of astigmatism
    Off-axis conic surface[63]. (a) Off-axis ellipsoid; (b) off-axis hyperboloid
    Fig. 17. Off-axis conic surface[63]. (a) Off-axis ellipsoid; (b) off-axis hyperboloid
    Optical properties of conic mirrors[19]
    Fig. 18. Optical properties of conic mirrors[19]
    Ideal imaging off-axis three-mirror system using focus transfer[19]. (a) Paraboloid-ellipsoid-ellipsoid; (b) paraboloid-hyperboloid-ellipsoid
    Fig. 19. Ideal imaging off-axis three-mirror system using focus transfer[19]. (a) Paraboloid-ellipsoid-ellipsoid; (b) paraboloid-hyperboloid-ellipsoid
    Design process of compact off-axis three-mirror system[19]. (a) Optical layout of initial system using CBS; (b) RMS spot diagram of initial system; (c) optical layout of design using CBR; (d) RMS wavefront error of system using CBR; (e) optical layout of design result using CBN; (f) RMS wavefront error of system using CBN; (g) RMS wavefront error of system after CBNs are converted to traditional xy polynomial surfaces
    Fig. 20. Design process of compact off-axis three-mirror system[19]. (a) Optical layout of initial system using CBS; (b) RMS spot diagram of initial system; (c) optical layout of design using CBR; (d) RMS wavefront error of system using CBR; (e) optical layout of design result using CBN; (f) RMS wavefront error of system using CBN; (g) RMS wavefront error of system after CBNs are converted to traditional xy polynomial surfaces
    Process of integrating two surfaces into single surface[21]. (a) Coordinates and the normals of sampling points from two original surfaces; (b) local coordinate system of base sphere and freeform surface; (c) freeform surface is obtained by fitting based on the normal of discrete points and residual
    Fig. 21. Process of integrating two surfaces into single surface[21]. (a) Coordinates and the normals of sampling points from two original surfaces; (b) local coordinate system of base sphere and freeform surface; (c) freeform surface is obtained by fitting based on the normal of discrete points and residual
    NURBS surface fitted with Peaks surface based on MBA algorithm[15]. (a) Peaks surface to be fitted; (b) result of 3rd fitting; (c) result of 4th fitting; (d) result of 5th fitting
    Fig. 22. NURBS surface fitted with Peaks surface based on MBA algorithm[15]. (a) Peaks surface to be fitted; (b) result of 3rd fitting; (c) result of 4th fitting; (d) result of 5th fitting
    Schematic diagram of ray tracing process[15]
    Fig. 23. Schematic diagram of ray tracing process[15]
    Inverse 3000 random pointTotal time /sAverage time /s
    Minimal distance algorithm(with fixed initial value)3.79250.001264
    Ray tracing algorithm(with fixed initial value)1.11370.000371
    Minimal distance algorithm(with estimated initial value)3.07930.001026
    Ray tracing algorithm(with estimated initial value)0.89540.000298
    Table 1. NURBS inversion algorithm's efficiency[15]
    Dewen Cheng, Hailong Chen, Yongtian Wang, Tong Yang. Mathematical Description and Design Methods of Complex Optical Surfaces[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2023, 43(8): 0822008
    Download Citation