• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 42, Issue 9, 0912004 (2022)
Chencheng Li1、2, Lihua Wang1, Fengtao Yan1, and Bin Fan1、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Institute of Optics and Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610209, Sichuan, China
  • 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS202242.0912004 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Chencheng Li, Lihua Wang, Fengtao Yan, Bin Fan. Misalignment Error Analysis of Segmented Diffractive Telescope[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2022, 42(9): 0912004 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic of Fresnel lens
    Fig. 1. Schematic of Fresnel lens
    Schematic of axial error
    Fig. 2. Schematic of axial error
    Schematic of eccentric error
    Fig. 3. Schematic of eccentric error
    Schematic of tilt error
    Fig. 4. Schematic of tilt error
    Schematic of comprehensive error
    Fig. 5. Schematic of comprehensive error
    Structure schematic of diffractive telescope
    Fig. 6. Structure schematic of diffractive telescope
    Structure of primary mirror
    Fig. 7. Structure of primary mirror
    Image quality evaluation. (a) Wavefront diagram; (b) dispersive focal shift diagram
    Fig. 8. Image quality evaluation. (a) Wavefront diagram; (b) dispersive focal shift diagram
    Simulation results. (a) Wavefront diagram of eccentric error; (b) wavefront diagram of axial error; (c) wavefront diagram of tilt error; (d) far field distribution of eccentric error; (e) far field distribution of axial error; (f) far field distribution of tilt error
    Fig. 9. Simulation results. (a) Wavefront diagram of eccentric error; (b) wavefront diagram of axial error; (c) wavefront diagram of tilt error; (d) far field distribution of eccentric error; (e) far field distribution of axial error; (f) far field distribution of tilt error
    Simulation results. (a) Wavefront diagram of comprehensive error; (b) far field distribution of comprehensive error
    Fig. 10. Simulation results. (a) Wavefront diagram of comprehensive error; (b) far field distribution of comprehensive error
    Simulation results. (a) Wavefront diagram of comprehensive error; (b) far field distribution of comprehensive error
    Fig. 11. Simulation results. (a) Wavefront diagram of comprehensive error; (b) far field distribution of comprehensive error
    Phase coefficientValue
    Coefficient on r'2-4.98665500570199982×10-1
    Coefficient on r'41.13076077703199996×10-9
    Coefficient on r'6-5.12819003652799974×10-18
    Coefficient on r'82.91192179754400000×10-26
    Coefficient on r'10-2.18940380956600017×10-34
    Table 1. Phase coefficient of Fresnel lens
    Optical component parameterValue
    Edge Fresnel lens diameter /mm370
    Center Fresnel lens diameter /mm700
    Primary lens diameter /m1.5
    Focal length /m9.7
    Waveband /μm0.55--0.65
    Table 2. Parameters of optical elements
    ParameterAxial error /μmEccentric error /μmTilt error /(°)
    Tolerance51.51.950.004
    PV0.2515λ0.2513λ0.2463λ
    Residual error0.0015λ0.0013λ0.0037λ
    Table 3. Tolerance and simulation results
    ParameterAxial error /μmEccentric error /μmTilt error /(°)
    Tolerance230.870.00176
    Table 4. Error distribution of synthetic errors
    Chencheng Li, Lihua Wang, Fengtao Yan, Bin Fan. Misalignment Error Analysis of Segmented Diffractive Telescope[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2022, 42(9): 0912004
    Download Citation