1. Calcination process of Ti3AlC2
2. Synthesis flowchart of TiO2/Ti3C2Tx composites
3. SEM images of Ti3AlC2(A), Ti3C2Tx(B, C), TiO2/Ti3C2Tx-350(D), TiO2/Ti3C2Tx-450(E) and TiO2/Ti3C2Tx-550(F), HRTEM (G) and elemental mapping(H, I) of TiO2/Ti3C2Tx-450
4. XRD patterns (A) of various samples, XRD patterns (B, C) of TiO2/Ti3C2Tx calcined at different temperatures, Raman spectra (D), N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms (E) and pore size distributions (F) of various samples
5. XPS spectra of Ti3C2Tx, TiO2/Ti3C2Tx-350, TiO2/Ti3C2Tx-450 and TiO2/Ti3C2Tx-550
6. CV curves(A), GCD(B) and EIS(C) of Ti3C2Tx, TiO2/Ti3C2Tx-350, TiO2/Ti3C2Tx-450 and TiO2/Ti3C2Tx-550 with inset in (C) representing the equivalent circuit
7. Desalination performance of TiO2/Ti3C2Tx-450‖AC device
8. SEM (A) and the enlarged (B) images of TiO2/Ti3C2Tx-450 after 20 cycling, XRD patterns(C, D) of TiO2/Ti3C2Tx-450 before and after desalting and regeneration
Sample | Specific surface area/(m2·g-1) | Pore size/nm | Pore volume/(cm3·g-1) |
---|
Ti3C2Tx | 8.542 | 51.979 | 0.111 | TiO2-Ti3C2Tx-350 | 23.227 | 26.394 | 0.153 | TiO2-Ti3C2Tx-450 | 14.630 | 41.005 | 0.150 | TiO2-Ti3C2Tx-550 | 12.324 | 40.134 | 0.124 |
|
Table 1. Comparison of specific surface areas, pore sizes and pore volumes of Ti3C2Tx, TiO2/Ti3C2Tx-350, TiO2/Ti3C2Tx-450 and TiO2/Ti3C2Tx-550
Sample | Specific surface area/(m2·g-1) | Initial conductivity/(mg·L-1) | Voltage/V | Desalination capacity/(mg·g-1) | Ref. |
---|
Pre-conditioned Ti3C2Tx MXene | - | 585.0 | -1.2 (discharge potential) | 9.19 | [42] | Ti3C2 MXene | 6.0 | 292.5 | 1.2 | 13.00 | [39] | Ar plasma modified Ti3C2Tx | - | 500.0 | 1.4 | 26.80 | [43] | LiH/HCl-etched Ti3C2Tx MXene | 2.1 | 585.0 | 1.2 | 67.70 | [44] | Porous Ti3C2Tx MXene | 293.0 | 10000.0 | 1.2 | 45.00 | [40] | Porous nitrogen-doped MXene sheets(N-Ti3C2Tx) | 368.8 | 5000.0 | 1.2 | 43.50±1.70 | [45] | TiO2/Ti3C2Tx-450 | 14.6 | 1500.0 | 1.2 | 22.00 | This work |
|
Table 2. Comparison of salt removal capacity among various CDI electrodes