• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 14, 1410021 (2021)
Zhaoyang Mao, Lan Li*, and Wei Wei
Author Affiliations
  • School of Science, Xi’an Shiyou University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710065, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.1410021 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Zhaoyang Mao, Lan Li, Wei Wei. Optimization Method for Sensing Matrix Based on Transfer Learning[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(14): 1410021 Copy Citation Text show less
    Histogram of the off-diagonal entries in the Gram matrix. (a) Random Gaussian matrix; (b) EIG method; (c) Elad method; (d) our method
    Fig. 1. Histogram of the off-diagonal entries in the Gram matrix. (a) Random Gaussian matrix; (b) EIG method; (c) Elad method; (d) our method
    Reconstruction errors of OMP and BP algorithm
    Fig. 2. Reconstruction errors of OMP and BP algorithm
    Reconstructed images at different sampling rates. (a) Original image; (b) sampling rate is 0.3; (c) sampling rate is 0.4; (d) sampling rate is 0.5
    Fig. 3. Reconstructed images at different sampling rates. (a) Original image; (b) sampling rate is 0.3; (c) sampling rate is 0.4; (d) sampling rate is 0.5
    Algorithm 1:transfer learning optimization of the sparse base
    Input:signal x,wavelet basic Ψ0,sparse matrix Ψ(0),maximum number of iterations Imax,soft threshold parameters λfor z=1∶Imaxcalculating sparsity coefficient s(z) by Eq. (12)singular value decomposition of s(z)xT+βΨ0 is performed to obtain UΣVTupdate Ψ(z)by Eq. (17)end forOutput:Ψ=Ψ(z)
    Table 1. Transfer learning optimization of the sparse base
    Algorithm 2: construction of measurement matrix Φ
    Input: measurement matrix Φ, sparse matrix Ψ, iterative threshold εInitialization: Gaussian random matrix Φ, A=ΦΨwhile halting criterion false doG=A~TA~,eigenvalue decomposition G=VHVTH^←diagH=n/mA^=VH^VTε0=A^ sum of non-diagonal elements if ε0-n/m2-n<ε doΦ^=A^Ψ-1 return ΦΦ^Output: measurement matrix Φ
    Table 2. Process of constructing measurement matrix
    MethodSampling rateBarbaraBoatsHouseLenaPeppersAverage
    Gaussian0.25.9634.3254.2423.9044.7204.630
    0.422.66621.97224.39825.24323.40523.536
    0.627.66925.88929.62230.25428.28328.343
    EIG0.26.4224.0514.4473.9264.3194.633
    0.423.42022.16725.38425.35823.73524.012
    0.629.37827.50831.94131.96630.26930.212
    Elad0.25.2844.9873.0354.2455.4384.597
    0.422.06522.06525.82425.81623.47923.849
    0.629.37827.32231.41231.96629.82629.980
    Ours0.27.3255.4244.7004.7574.6505.371
    0.423.11122.31725.27125.85823.71524.054
    0.629.69527.62931.97432.04430.38730.346
    Table 3. PSNR of images reconstructed by 4 methods unit: dB
    MethodBarbaraBoatsHouseLenaPeppers
    Gaussian1.5931.5591.5141.5681.499
    EIG1.8601.7851.7251.7371.727
    Elad6.0246.2636.0326.0826.051
    Ours2.0822.1202.0662.0962.097
    Table 4. Running time of 4 methods unit: s
    Zhaoyang Mao, Lan Li, Wei Wei. Optimization Method for Sensing Matrix Based on Transfer Learning[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(14): 1410021
    Download Citation