Fig. 1. FTIR spectra of NaCl aqueous solutions(0, 2%, 4%, …, 28%, 30%, step 2%)
Fig. 2. The difference spectra between NaCl aqueous solution(2%, 6%, …, 26%, 30%, step 4%) and pure water, respectively
Fig. 3. The subtraction spectra between A16% and different A^16%(c1, c2)
a: ΔA16%(14%, 18%); b: ΔA16%(12%, 20%); c: ΔA16%(10%, 22%); d: ΔA16%(8%, 24%); e: ΔA16%(6%, 26%); f: ΔA16%(4%, 28%); g: ΔA16%(2%, 30%)
Fig. 4. The subtraction spectra between A16% and different Ah16%(c1, c2)
a: ΔAh16%(14%, 18%); b: ΔAh16%(12%, 20%); c: ΔAh16%(10%, 22%); d: ΔAh16%(8%, 24%); e: ΔAh16%(6%, 26%); f: ΔAh16%(4%, 28%); g: ΔAh16%(2%, 30%)
Fig. 5. The subtraction spectra between Ac and Ahc(2%, 30%)
a: ΔAh4%; b: ΔAh6%; c: ΔAh8%; d: ΔAh10%; e: ΔAh12%;f: ΔAh14%; g: ΔAh16%; h: ΔAh18%; i: ΔAh20%; j: ΔAh22%;k: ΔAh24%; l: ΔAh26%; m: ΔAh28%
Fig. 6. The fitting regression coefficient-c curves
(a): a^-c curve; (b): b^-c curve
Fig. 7. The real spectra (dashed line) and corresponding hybrid spectra (dotted line) of NaCl aqueous solutions
a: A5% and Ah5%(2%, 30%); b: A13% and Ah13%(2%, 30%);c: A15% and Ah15%(2%, 30%); d: A19% and Ah19%(2%, 30%);e: A23% and Ah23%(2%, 30%); f: A25% and Ah25%(2%, 30%)
编号 | Ac | | | (c1, c2)=++ |
---|
1 | A16% | A14% | A18% | (14%, 18%)=0.585 6×A14%+0.414 1×A18%-3.47×10-4 | 2 | A16% | A12% | A20% | (12%, 20%)=0.556 6×A12%+0.443 1×A20%-1.33×10-5 | 3 | A16% | A10% | A22% | (10%, 22%)=0.507 7×A10%+0.490 9×A22%-6.01×10-4 | 4 | A16% | A8% | A24% | (8%, 24%)=0.501 9×A8%+0.496 7×A24%+4.29×10-4 | 5 | A16% | A6% | A26% | (6%, 26%)=0.477 1×A6%+0.530 9×A26%+4.58×10-4 | 6 | A16% | A4% | A28% | (4%, 28%)=0.479 6×A4%+0.524 5×A28%+3.44×10-4 | 7 | A16% | A2% | A30% | (2%, 30%)=0.484 2×A2%+0.516 6×A30%-3.17×10-5 |
|
Table 1. The binary linear regression equations between Ac and ,
编号 | F | r2 | 估计标 准误差 | | | |
---|
1 | 7.2×108 | 1.000 | 1.7×10-4 | 811 | 573 | 106 | 2 | 6.7×108 | 1.000 | 1.8×10-4 | 1 541 | 1 232 | -4 | 3 | 2.8×108 | 1.000 | 2.8×10-4 | 1 273 | 1 243 | 119 | 4 | 2.3×108 | 1.000 | 3.1×10-4 | 1 504 | 1 516 | 75 | 5 | 1.4×108 | 1.000 | 3.9×10-4 | 1 399 | 1 553 | 64 | 6 | 1.2×108 | 1.000 | 4.3×10-4 | 1 528 | 1 727 | 43 | 7 | 6.9×107 | 1.000 | 5.6×10-4 | 1 371 | 1 507 | -3 |
|
Table 2. The significance test of linear regression effect of the regression equations between A16% and ,
编号 | Ac | | | Ahc(2%, 30%)=A2%+A30% |
---|
1 | A4% | A2% | A30% | Ah4%(2%, 30%)=0.930 3×A2%+0.062 6×A30% | 2 | A6% | A2% | A30% | Ah6%(2%, 30%)=0.855 2×A2%+0.149 9×A30% | 3 | A8% | A2% | A30% | Ah8%(2%, 30%)=0.772 5×A2%+0.229 7×A30% | 4 | A10% | A2% | A30% | Ah10%(2%, 30%)=0.696 5×A2%+0.307 2×A30% | 5 | A12% | A2% | A30% | Ah12%(2%, 30%)=0.622 1×A2%+0.381 4×A30% | 6 | A14% | A2% | A30% | Ah14%(2%, 30%)=0.546 6×A2%+0.456 5×A30% | 7 | A16% | A2% | A30% | Ah16%(2%, 30%)=0.484 2×A2%+0.516 6×A30% | 8 | A18% | A2% | A30% | Ah18%(2%, 30%)=0.396 9×A2%+0.601 2×A30% | 9 | A20% | A2% | A30% | Ah20%(2%, 30%)=0.311 6×A2%+0.686 5×A30% | 10 | A22% | A2% | A30% | Ah22%(2%, 30%)=0.266 1×A2%+0.734 5×A30% | 11 | A24% | A2% | A30% | Ah24%(2%, 30%)=0.194 5×A2%+0.807 7×A30% | 12 | A26% | A2% | A30% | Ah26%(2%, 30%)=0.144 0×A2%+0.857 6×A30% | 13 | A28% | A2% | A30% | Ah28%(2%, 30%)=0.072 66×A2%+0.927 6×A30% |
|
Table 3. The hybrid spectra equations between Ahc and A2%, A30%
c(w/v)/% | | | + |
---|
4 | 0.930 3 | 0.062 6 | 0.992 9 | 10 | 0.696 5 | 0.307 2 | 1.003 7 | 16 | 0.484 2 | 0.516 6 | 1.000 8 | 22 | 0.266 1 | 0.734 5 | 1.000 6 | 28 | 0.072 7 | 0.927 6 | 1.000 3 |
|
Table 4. The relationship among c, regression coefficient and and +