• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 9, Issue 9, 1667 (2021)
Hafiz Saad Khaliq1、†, Inki Kim2、†, Aima Zahid1、†, Joohoon Kim2, Taejun Lee2, Trevon Badloe2, Yeseul Kim2, Muhammad Zubair1、6, Kashif Riaz1、7, Muhammad Qasim Mehmood1、8, and Junsuk Rho2、3、4、5、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1NanoTech Lab, Department of Electrical Engineering, Information Technology University (ITU) of the Punjab, Lahore 54600, Pakistan
  • 2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang 37673, Republic of Korea
  • 3Department of Chemical Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang 37673, Republic of Korea
  • 4POSCO-POSTECH-RIST Convergence Research Center for Flat Optics and Metaphotonics, Pohang 37673, Republic of Korea
  • 5National Institute of Nanomaterials Technology (NINT), Pohang 37673, Republic of Korea
  • 6e-mail: muhammad.zubair@itu.edu.pk
  • 7e-mail: kashif.riaz@itu.edu.pk
  • 8e-mail: qasim.mehmood@itu.edu.pk
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.424477 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Hafiz Saad Khaliq, Inki Kim, Aima Zahid, Joohoon Kim, Taejun Lee, Trevon Badloe, Yeseul Kim, Muhammad Zubair, Kashif Riaz, Muhammad Qasim Mehmood, Junsuk Rho. Giant chiro-optical responses in multipolar-resonances-based single-layer dielectric metasurfaces[J]. Photonics Research, 2021, 9(9): 1667 Copy Citation Text show less
    Working principle of the single-layered all-dielectric diatomic metasurface and optical setup. (a) Schematic image of the working principle of the proposed diatomic metasurface introducing a giant chiro-optical effect in the visible regime. (b) SEM image of a portion of the fabricated diatomic metasurface. The scale bar is (i) 2 μm; (ii) 0.75 μm; (iii) 0.25 μm. (c) The characterization setup of the designed dielectric metasurface for giant chiro-optical effect. An arc lamp housing is used as the light source. A linear polarizer is used to linearly polarize the input beam, passing through a QWP to produce LHCP or RHCP light. The OL focuses on the polarized light, which illuminates the sample. The transmitted light beam from the sample further passes through another OL, QWP, and polarizer. Finally, the results are recorded by using a spectrometer.
    Fig. 1. Working principle of the single-layered all-dielectric diatomic metasurface and optical setup. (a) Schematic image of the working principle of the proposed diatomic metasurface introducing a giant chiro-optical effect in the visible regime. (b) SEM image of a portion of the fabricated diatomic metasurface. The scale bar is (i) 2 μm; (ii) 0.75 μm; (iii) 0.25 μm. (c) The characterization setup of the designed dielectric metasurface for giant chiro-optical effect. An arc lamp housing is used as the light source. A linear polarizer is used to linearly polarize the input beam, passing through a QWP to produce LHCP or RHCP light. The OL focuses on the polarized light, which illuminates the sample. The transmitted light beam from the sample further passes through another OL, QWP, and polarizer. Finally, the results are recorded by using a spectrometer.
    Optimization of the building block of the diatomic metasurface. (a) 3D perspective view of the building block of the metasurface containing a pair of distinct a-Si:H-based nanofins with a relative angle (Δϕ) of 45 deg to break mirror symmetry with respect to the metasurface plane; (b) top view of the optimized building block of the metasurface with structural parameters of width1 W1=100 nm, length1 L1=195 nm, width2 W2=70 nm, length2 L2=200 nm, displacement S=227.5 nm, periodicity in the x direction Px=455 nm, periodicity in the y direction Py=255 nm, and height H=400 nm. The strong chiro-optical effect depends on the following parameters: the periodicity of the building block, the local displacement between nanofins, which depends on the length and width of the nanofin, and the relative rotation angle between the nanofins along the plane of the metasurface. The simulated cross-polarized transmittance parameter with varying length and width of left nanofin while keeping all other parameters (S,Px,Py, and H) fixed for (c) RHCP and (d) LHCP illumination at the wavelength of 633 nm. The red circle shows the chosen dimensions (L1×W1) are 195 and 100 nm. The simulated cross-polarized transmittance parameter with varying length and width of the right nanofin while keeping all other parameters fixed for (e) RHCP and (f) LHCP illumination at the wavelength of 633 nm. The chosen dimensions (L2×W2) are 200 and 70 nm. The cross-polarized transmittance parameter with a varying periodicity of the building block in the x and y directions while keeping all other parameters fixed for (g) RHCP and (h) LHCP illumination at the wavelength of 633 nm.
    Fig. 2. Optimization of the building block of the diatomic metasurface. (a) 3D perspective view of the building block of the metasurface containing a pair of distinct a-Si:H-based nanofins with a relative angle (Δϕ) of 45 deg to break mirror symmetry with respect to the metasurface plane; (b) top view of the optimized building block of the metasurface with structural parameters of width1W1=100  nm, length1L1=195  nm, width2W2=70  nm, length2L2=200  nm, displacement S=227.5  nm, periodicity in the x direction Px=455  nm, periodicity in the y direction Py=255  nm, and height H=400  nm. The strong chiro-optical effect depends on the following parameters: the periodicity of the building block, the local displacement between nanofins, which depends on the length and width of the nanofin, and the relative rotation angle between the nanofins along the plane of the metasurface. The simulated cross-polarized transmittance parameter with varying length and width of left nanofin while keeping all other parameters (S,Px,Py, and H) fixed for (c) RHCP and (d) LHCP illumination at the wavelength of 633 nm. The red circle shows the chosen dimensions (L1×W1) are 195 and 100 nm. The simulated cross-polarized transmittance parameter with varying length and width of the right nanofin while keeping all other parameters fixed for (e) RHCP and (f) LHCP illumination at the wavelength of 633 nm. The chosen dimensions (L2×W2) are 200 and 70 nm. The cross-polarized transmittance parameter with a varying periodicity of the building block in the x and y directions while keeping all other parameters fixed for (g) RHCP and (h) LHCP illumination at the wavelength of 633 nm.
    Representation of parameters of the Jones matrix for designed metasurface in transmission and reflection. The simulated coefficients of the Jones matrix in transmission (TLR, LHCP transmission/RHCP incidence; TRL, RHCP transmission/LHCP incidence; TRR, RHCP transmission/RHCP incidence; TLL, LHCP transmission/LHCP incidence) of the metasurface for illumination in the (a) forward and (b) backward directions. Similarly, the measured transmission coefficients are illustrated for illumination in the (d) forward and (e) backward directions. The (c) simulated and (f) measured AT parameters comparing forward and backward propagation. The simulated reflectance coefficients of the Jones matrix are illustrated for illumination in the (g) forward and (h) backward directions. The CD for the diatomic structure plotted for incident light in (i) forward and (j) backward directions.
    Fig. 3. Representation of parameters of the Jones matrix for designed metasurface in transmission and reflection. The simulated coefficients of the Jones matrix in transmission (TLR, LHCP transmission/RHCP incidence; TRL, RHCP transmission/LHCP incidence; TRR, RHCP transmission/RHCP incidence; TLL, LHCP transmission/LHCP incidence) of the metasurface for illumination in the (a) forward and (b) backward directions. Similarly, the measured transmission coefficients are illustrated for illumination in the (d) forward and (e) backward directions. The (c) simulated and (f) measured AT parameters comparing forward and backward propagation. The simulated reflectance coefficients of the Jones matrix are illustrated for illumination in the (g) forward and (h) backward directions. The CD for the diatomic structure plotted for incident light in (i) forward and (j) backward directions.
    AT parameter dependence on the incident angle of light. AT parameter in the forward direction for a wide range of incident angles in (a) xz plane and (b) yz plane.
    Fig. 4. AT parameter dependence on the incident angle of light. AT parameter in the forward direction for a wide range of incident angles in (a) xz plane and (b) yz plane.
    Scattering power in terms of multipolar resonances. Calculated normalized multipolar decomposition for individual nanofins of the diatomic structure for (a), (b) RHCP and (c), (d) LHCP illumination in the forward direction. The red, blue, green, magenta, and black curves show the scattering power for the ED, MD, TD, EQ, and MQ modes, respectively.
    Fig. 5. Scattering power in terms of multipolar resonances. Calculated normalized multipolar decomposition for individual nanofins of the diatomic structure for (a), (b) RHCP and (c), (d) LHCP illumination in the forward direction. The red, blue, green, magenta, and black curves show the scattering power for the ED, MD, TD, EQ, and MQ modes, respectively.
    Electric and magnetic field distributions at different wavelengths in the visible regime. Calculated normalized EM field distributions at different wavelengths in the visible regime for the individual nanofins for RHCP and LHCP incident light. The normalized electric field distributions for the left and right nanofins at the wavelengths of 550, 640, and 700 nm for (a)–(f) RHCP and (g)–(i) LHCP illumination. Similarly, the normalized magnetic field distributions for the left and right nanofins at the wavelengths of 550, 640, and 700 nm for (m)–(r) RHCP and (s)–(x) LHCP illumination. The blue lines with white arrows show the direction of electric currents.
    Fig. 6. Electric and magnetic field distributions at different wavelengths in the visible regime. Calculated normalized EM field distributions at different wavelengths in the visible regime for the individual nanofins for RHCP and LHCP incident light. The normalized electric field distributions for the left and right nanofins at the wavelengths of 550, 640, and 700 nm for (a)–(f) RHCP and (g)–(i) LHCP illumination. Similarly, the normalized magnetic field distributions for the left and right nanofins at the wavelengths of 550, 640, and 700 nm for (m)–(r) RHCP and (s)–(x) LHCP illumination. The blue lines with white arrows show the direction of electric currents.
    ReferencesWavelength (nm)Design MaterialDesign GeometryBroadband/Multiband3D/2D (Multilayer/Single layer)Maximum ATMaximum CD
    [62]7000–12,000SiliconNanofinsBroadbandSingle layer0.69 at 9.6 μm
    [63]540Titanium dioxideGammadationSingle bandSingle layer0.90.8
    [64]550SiliconNanocube dimersSingle bandSingle layerCD enhancement up to 15-fold
    [61]600Silver/siliconNanodiskSingle bandSingle layerCD enhancement in silicon
    [57]1100–1600SiliconNanofinsBroadbandBilayer0.7 at 1500 nm
    [34]1655Siliconz-shapedSingle bandSingle layer0.8
    [66]500–800a-Si:HNanofilms-based supercellBroadbandSingle layer0.580.55
    [67]550–700a-Si:HNanofin dimersBroadbandSingle layer0.7 at 633 nm
    This work550–700a-Si:HNanofinsBroadbandSingle layer0.70.6 for FPa, exceeding for BPb
    Table 1. Comparison of the Relevant Literature of All-Dielectric Structures with the Proposed Design
    Hafiz Saad Khaliq, Inki Kim, Aima Zahid, Joohoon Kim, Taejun Lee, Trevon Badloe, Yeseul Kim, Muhammad Zubair, Kashif Riaz, Muhammad Qasim Mehmood, Junsuk Rho. Giant chiro-optical responses in multipolar-resonances-based single-layer dielectric metasurfaces[J]. Photonics Research, 2021, 9(9): 1667
    Download Citation