Fig. 1. Mid-infrared absorption spectra for common gases
[5] Fig. 2. Mid-infrared integrated on-chip sensing system
Fig. 3. Mid-IR waveguide sensing units. (a) The germanium strip waveguide designed by Yu-Chi Chang et al. for cocaine sensing
[42]; (b) SEM image of the air-clad pedestal silicon waveguide designed by Pao Tai Lin et al.
[43]; (c) Microscope image of the monolithic integrated sensor designed by Yi Zou et al. using germanium waveguides
[44]; (d) The strip waveguide designed by Neetesh Singh et al. for D
2O sensing
[6]; (e) The suspended silicon waveguide designed by Floria Ottonello-Briano et al. for CO
2 sensing (top) and the support structure of the designed suspended silicon waveguide (bottom)
[8] Fig. 4. Mid-IR slot waveguide & iHWG sensing units. (a) SEM image of the mid-infrared slot waveguide designed by Nedeljkovic et al.
[46]; (b) Simulation result of the mid-infrared slot waveguide by the same team in 2015
[47]; (c) The “silicon-liquid-silicon” nanofluidic slot-waveguide based on-chip chemical sensor designed by Pao Tai Lin et al
[48]; (d) Schematic of a spiral iHWG etched on silicon substrate designed by Shaonan Zheng et al (top), the cross section of the spiral iHWG (bottom left) and the schematic assembly of LED, iHWG, and PD (bottom right)
[50] Fig. 5. Mid-IR ring resonator based sensing units. (a) SEM image of the racetrack resonator designed by Benedetto Troia et al
[58]; (b) Cascaded ring resonators for acetone/IPA sensing designed by Yuhua Chang et al
[59]; (c) The ring resonator based N
2O sensor designed by Clinton J Smith et al
[62] ; (d) The sensor on a CaF
2 substrate based on ring resonators designed by Yu Chen et al
[63] Fig. 6. Mid-IR photonic crystal waveguide sensing units. (a) The schematic of the mid-infrared silicon-on-sapphire photonic crystal waveguide coupled microcavity designed by Yi Zou et al
[72]; (b) The mid-infrared photonic crystal waveguide based TEP sensor designed by the same group: SEM image of the holey photonic crystal waveguide (left) and SEM image of the slotted photonic crystal waveguide (right)
[73] ; (c) The schematic of the ethanol sensor based on photonic crystal designed by Ali Rostamian et al
[74] Fig. 7. Mid-IR in-plane sensing units based on materials except group-IV. (a) The Ta
2O
5 waveguide designed by Marek Vlk et al for acetylene sensing
[85]; (b) SEM image of chalcogenide waveguide designed by Mingquan Pi et al for CO
2 sensing (left) and the sensor schematic (right)
[90]; (c) Schematic of the bendable AlN-on-borosilicate waveguide based chemical sensor (left) and cross-section (right) designed by Tiening Jin et al
[92] Fig. 8. Scheme of the monolithically integrated plasmonic waveguide sensor designed by Benedikt Schwarz et al
[34] Fig. 9. Mid-IR out-of-plane sensors. (a) The flexible surface plasmon resonance biochemical sensor based on PDMS materials designed by Chiao-Yun Chang et al
[93]; (b) The dual-resonance Mid-IR MPA multifunctional chemical sensing platform designed by Dongxiao Li et al
[17]; (c) The multi-resonance metasurface based label-free biosensor designed by Daniel Rodrigo et al
[108]; (d) Schematic of the biosensor for passively capturing analyte molecules designed by Xianglong Miao et al
[117]; (e) Schematic of the cross-section of the graphene-metallic metasurface biosensor designed by Yibo Zhu et al
[119] Fig. 10. Reconstructive spectrometers. (a) Reconstructive spectrometer simulation based on inverse design proposed by Tianran Liu et al
[135]; (b) Schematic of a tunable reconstructive spectrometer based on black phosphorus proposed by Shaofan Yuan et al
[136]; (c) Reconstructive spectrometer with a multi-lattice periodic array of metal nano-aluminum disks designed by Hwa-Seub Lee et al
[137] Fig. 11. Spatial heterodyne Fourier transform spectrometers. (a) SEM image of a MZI array spectrometer designed by Milos Nedeljkovic et al
[140]; (b) SEM image of a MZI array spectrometer designed by Qiankun Liu et al
[142] ; (c) Schematic diagram of thermo-optical scanning MZI array spectrometer designed by Miguel Montesinos-Ballester et al
[143]; (d) Schematic diagram and SEM image of a micromechanical structure-type Fourier transform spectrometer designed by Alaa Fathy et al
[144] Fig. 12. Principle and structure diagram of the dual-comb spectrometer. (a) Frequency domain and time domain schematic of the dual-comb spectrometer
[147]; (b) Schematic of the on-chip dual-comb spectrometer based on the optical parametric oscillator by Mengjie Yu et al
[150];(c) Schematic and optical microscope image of a nonlinear dissipative Kerr soliton dual-comb spectrometer in the near-infrared by Tong Lin et al
[151] Fig. 13. Optical response range of some absorbing materials
Fig. 14. Mid-IR integrated photodetectors. (a) Schematic of the integrated InSb photodetector on Si substrate reported by Bowen Jia et al
[160]; (b) Schematic of the high-performance InAs/InAsSb superlattice mid-infrared detector directly grown on Si substrate proposed by Evangelia Delli et al
[161]; (c) Schematic of the GeSn mid-infrared detector proposed by Cong Hui et al
[163]; (d) Schematic of the GeSn mid-infrared detector proposed by Huong Tran et al
[164] ; (e) Schematic of a graphene-based heterostructure photodetector proposed by Xiaomu Wang et al
[165]; (f) Schematic of the photodetector based on chalcogenide glass-on-graphene waveguide integration proposed by HongTao Lin et al
[24]; (g) Schematic of the metal-graphene-metal waveguide integrated detector reported by Zhibo Qu et al
[166]; (h) Schematic of the waveguide-integrated black phosphorus mid-infrared detector proposed by Li Huang et al
[167] Ref. | Wafer | Wavelength/μm | Structure | Performance
& applications
| [6]
| SOS | 3.96 | Strip waveguide | 0.25% D2O sensing (Experimental)
| [8]
| SOI | 4.24 | Suspended waveguide | 0.1% CO2 sensing
Propagation loss: 3 dB/cm
(Experimental)
| [46]
| SOI | 3.8 | Slot waveguide | Propagation loss: 9-10 dB/cm
0.04 dB/interface
(Experimental)
| [47]
| SOI | 3.8 | Slot waveguide | Propagation loss: 1.40.2 dB/cm
0.09 dB/interface
0.18 dB/bend
(Experimental)
| [48]
| SOI | 2.5-4 | Slot waveguide | Differentiating
n-bromohexane (R-Br)
isopropanol (R-OH)
toluene (Ar-CH3)
| [50]
| — | 4.26 | iHWG | Propagation loss: 0.170.07 dB/mm
(Experimental)
| [51]
| — | 4.5 | iHWG | High sensitivity N2O sensing with analytical LOD of 0.0005%
| [58]
| SOI | 3.7-3.8 | Ring resonator | Q: ~8000
FSRvernier: 98
(Experimental)
| [59]
| SOI | 3.65-3.95 | Ring resonator | Q: ~4000
FSRvernier: 90
Acetone/IPA sensing
with sensitivity: 3000 nm/RIU
LOD: 0.002 RIU
Theoretical <1% IPA in acetone sensing
| [62]
| SOS | 4.46 | Ring resonator | Q: ~40000 (Experimental)
Sufficient for 0.5% N2O sensing
(Theoretical)
| [63]
| CaF2 | 5.2 | Ring resonator | Ethanol, toluene, IPA sensing with low mass loading LOD of 0.05 ng, 0.06 ng and 0.09 ng (Experimental) | [73]
| SOS | 3.43 | Photonic crystal | 0.001% TEP sensing
(Experimental)
| [74]
| SOI | 3.4 | Photonic crystal | Ethanol sensing with
LOD of 250 ppb (Experimental)
| [85]
| Si | 2.566 | Ta2O5 free-standing shallow rib waveguide
| High sensitivity C2H2 sensing with LOD of 0.0007% (Experimental)
| [90]
| Si | 4.319 | ChG-on-MgF2 waveguide
| ~ 0.3% CO2 sensing (Experimental)
| [92]
| Borosilicate | 2.5-2.65 | AlN waveguide | Identification of
methanol, ethanol and water
| [34]
| N-doped InP | 6.5 | Plasmon waveguide | H2O/C2H5OH sensing with a high dynamic range of concentration
(0-60%) and a resolution of 0.06%
|
|
Table 1. Characteristics of the Mid-IR in-plane sensing units
Ref. | Wavelength/μm | Device | Performance & applications | [93]
| ~5.09 | MIM-disk LSPR sensor | Flexible sensor Sensivity: 1670 nm/RIU (Experimental) Detecting A549 cancer cells in a PBS+ solution | [17]
| ~6.19 for C=C & ~7.98 for C-O-C | Multifunctional chemical sensing platform based on dual-resonant infrared plasmonic MPA | detecting the states of PECA, including vibrational detection, thickness measurement, and observation of
polymerization and curing
| [108]
| 5.88-6.67 for amide I–II &
3.33-3.57 for CH2 | Multi-resonant infrared metasurface sensor | Real-time monitoring of lipid-protein systems in aqueous environments | [117]
| 5.88-7.14 | Biosensor with passive molecule trapping functionality | L-proline & D-glucose sensing with a mass down to
~1 pg (Experimental)
| [119]
| ~6.67 | Hybrid graphene-metallic metasurface sensor | Measuring the monolayers of sub-nanometer-sized molecules or particles Affinity binding-based quantitative detection of glucose down to 200 pM (36 pg/mL) (Experimental) |
|
Table 2. Characteristics of the mid-IR out-of-plane SPR sensors
Ref. | Structure | Wavelength/Wavenumber | Feature | Notes | [135]
| Disorder structure | 3 000-3 500 nm | Single channel FWHM can achieve 39 nm | Simulation | [136]
| Black phosphorus | 2-9 μm | 90 nm resolution with 4-7 μm bandwidth | | [137]
| Nano metal disk array | 1 000-4 000 cm−1 | Can recover two peaks with FWHM 76 cm−1, center interval 115 cm−1 | |
|
Table 3. Summary of reconstructive spectrometers
Ref. | Structure | Wavelength/Wavenumber | Feature | [140]
| 42 MZIs array | 3.75 μm | 2.7 nm resolution with 57 nm bandwidth | [141]
| 12 MZIs array | 3 000 cm−1 | Better than 10 cm−1 resolution with 50 cm−1 bandwidth
| [142]
| 19 MZIs array | 5-8.5 μm | Better than 15 cm−1 resolution with 132 cm−1 FSR
| [143]
| 10 MZIs array with thermo-optics modulation | 7.7 μm | Better than 15 cm−1 resolution with 603 cm−1 FSR
| [144]
| 4 channels MI with one MEMS driver | 1.55 μm, 2 μm | 2.4 nm resolution at 1.55 μm, 4.9 nm resolution at 2 μm |
|
Table 4. Summary of spatial heterodyne Fourier transform spectrometers
Ref. | Comb generation | Wavelength/μm | Performance | Notes | [150]
| OPO | 2.9-3.1 | 4.2 cm−1 resolution with 200 nm bandwidth
| Provide an example for Mid-IR dual-comb on-chip spectrometer | [151]
| DKS | 1.55 | Better than 400 kHz resolution with 37.5 THz bandwidth |
|
Table 5. Summary of dual-comb spectrometers
Ref. | Type | Material | Spectral range or cutoff wavelength | Key feature | Notes | R: Responsivity, D*: Detectivity
| [159]
| InAsSb/InSb | InAs/GaAs | 5-8 μm at 80 K | Low dark current density | | [160]
| InSb | ~5.7 μm at 80 K
~6.3 μm at 200 K
| R: 0.7 A/W, D*:8.8×109 Jones
| | [161]
| InAs/InAsSb | ~5.5 μm at 200 K | R: 0.88 A/W, D*: 1.5×1010 Jones
| | [165]
| 2D material | Graphene | 2.75 μm at room temperature | R: 0.13 A/W | Waveguide integrated | [166]
| Graphene | 3.8 μm at room temperature | R: 2.2 mA/W | Waveguide integrated | [24]
| Graphene | 2.0-2.55 μm (Research range) | R: 250 mA/W | Waveguide integrated | [162]
| WS2 | 0.2 μm-3.043 μm | R: 224 mA/W, D*: 1.5×1012 Jones
| | [167]
| BP | 3.68-4.03 μm at room temperature (Research range) | R: 23 A/W at 3.68 μm and
2 A/W at 4 μm
| Waveguide integrated | [136]
| BP | 2-9 μm | N/A | Tunable range | [163]
| IV | GeSn | ~2.3 μm at room temperature | R: 93 mA/W | | [164]
| GeSn | ~3.65 μm at 300 K, 22.3% Sn | R: 16.1 A/W, D*: 1.1×1010 Jones at 77 K and 12.5% Sn
R: 3.2 mA/W, D*: 1.1×108 Jones at 300 K and 22.3% Sn
| |
|
Table 6. Summary of mid-IR integrated photodetectors