Author Affiliations
1Sino-European Institute of Aviation Engineering, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China2SHINING 3D Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311258, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. HSI color model. (a) Double cone model; (b) hue distribution
Fig. 2. RGB plane with I=0.5
Fig. 3. Measurement hardware system
Fig. 4. Comparison of projected images before and after color correction. (a) Before color correction; (b) after color correction
Fig. 5. Hue correction contrast. (a) Hue and ideal hue after correction; (b) error distribution of hue after correction
Fig. 6. System structure diagram
Fig. 7. Calibration of measurement system. (a) Calibration method of mapping relationship between h and ΔH; (b) height error
Fig. 8. Repeated measurement results of standard gauge block grinding surface. (a) Height contour; (b) measurement error
Fig. 9. Corresponding color of hue values in range of 0°-360°
Fig. 10. Process of calculating hue components of color projection pattern. (a) Grayscale transformation relationship corresponding to 0°-360°; (b) color projection pattern; (c) normalized conversion to hue gamut; (d) hue distribution at mark line
Fig. 11. Schematic of wrapped hue and color bar coding cut line
Fig. 12. Dividing process of fringe boundary on discontinuous surface. (a) Wrapped hue; (b) color bar coding; (c) fringe boundary division; (d) boundary division section line
Fig. 13. Hue unwrapping results. (a) Three-dimensional result; (b) section of hue unwrapped at marking line
Fig. 14. Measurement results of aero-engine compressor blades. (a) Captured image of blade; (b) color pattern; (c) wrapped hue value; (d) color bar code; (e) three-dimensional shape of compressor blade
Fig. 15. Error distribution of proposed method
Fig. 16. Compressor blade profile parameters
Code | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
---|
Color | Red | Yellow | Green | Cyan-blue | Blue | Magenta | Three-channel grayscale value | (1,0,0) | (1,1,0) | (0,1,0) | (0,1,1) | (0,0,1) | (1,0,1) |
|
Table 1. Composition of color stripe coding
Parameter | Formulamethod | LUT-basedhue solution |
---|
Time-consuming /s | 3.1615 | 0.0817 |
|
Table 2. Comparison of time used for different algorithms to calculate hue
Method | Number ofprojected images | Calculationtime /s |
---|
Four-step phaseshifting method | 4 | 0.0198 | FTP | 1 | 0.1027 | Color three-stepphase shifting method | 1 | 0.0259 | Proposed method | 1 | 0.0159 |
|
Table 3. Comparison of efficiency of wrapped phase/hue acquisition methods
Method | Number ofprojected images | Calculationtime /s |
---|
Gray code | 6 | 0.0073 | Proposed method | 1 | 0.0146 |
|
Table 4. Comparison of efficiency of phase/hue unwrapping methods