
- Photonics Research
- Vol. 9, Issue 9, 1650 (2021)
Abstract
1. INTRODUCTION
Metasurfaces have attracted considerable attention due to the specific electromagnetic response that goes beyond limitations of natural materials, providing new and unprecedented ways to manipulate the phase, magnitude, and polarization of electromagnetic waves. Metasurfaces, as two-dimensional (2D) structures, show significantly lower profile and losses than their three-dimensional (3D) metamaterials counterparts. They have been devoted to the design of a plethora of fascinating devices, such as polarization convertors [1–4], vortex beam generators [5,6], beam deflectors [7], perfect absorbers [8,9], and imaging holography [10–13]. However, the output response of passive metasurfaces cannot be modified once fabricated, resulting in the limitation of applications. To achieve multiple output possibilities with a passive metasurface, the polarization state of the illuminating wave is exploited as a common tool for an important degree of freedom. By judiciously designing anisotropic meta-atoms that show polarization-sensitive electromagnetic (EM) responses, several functionalities can be realized with different linearly polarized incident waves [14–16]. For circularly polarized incident waves with different spin, multifunctional meta-devices can be achieved based on the Pancharatnam–Berry (PB) phase principle [17,18].
To dynamically manipulate EM waves, tunable components are loaded in metasurface designs. When the external stimuli applied to the component are modified, the electromagnetic response of the meta-atom is accordingly adjusted. Several mechanisms can be exploited to design reconfigurable metasurfaces, for instance, thermal [19,20], optical [21–24], mechanical stretching [25–28], micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) [29,30], and electrical [31–35] mechanisms. Thermal, optical, and mechanical stretching mechanisms are limited to global control of the metasurface. MEMS-loaded metasurfaces suffer from the drawback of high actuation voltages and complex manufacturing. P-i-n diodes and varactor diodes applied for electrical tuning mechanism are widely used for multifunctional reconfigurable metasurface designs [36–48]. Metasurfaces integrating p-i-n diodes with only two different electrical states (“ON” and “OFF”) offer binary phase states tunability [36–39], limiting potential applications to advanced wavefront tailoring. However, reconfigurable metasurfaces with continuous phase control can be realized by incorporating varactor diodes with dynamically tuned capacitance upon applied bias voltage. In Refs. [40–48], the metasurfaces integrating varactor diodes could be adjusted solely along one lateral direction or in sectors, thus limiting the application perspectives, despite achieving nearly 360° phase coverage.
In this paper, a microwave versatile metasurface platform with individually addressable meta-atoms enabling nearly 340° phase coverage, is designed for an operation around 9.5 GHz by the incorporation of varactor diodes. Three complex beams, i.e., Bessel beam, vortex beam, and Airy beam, are generated to validate the performance of the fully dynamic metasurface. First, the zeroth-order Bessel beam is generated by implementing the phase profile mimicking an axicon lens. Then, a vortex beam carrying OAM mode 1 is generated. Focusing and nondiffracting vortex beams with limited beam radius are also fulfilled by superposing the spiral-plate phase profile with a focusing lens phase profile and a nondiffracting zeroth-order Bessel beam phase profile, respectively. Furthermore, another complex beam, the 2D Airy beam, is achieved using a 1 bit coding phase profile changing between
Sign up for Photonics Research TOC. Get the latest issue of Photonics Research delivered right to you!Sign up now
2. DYNAMIC METASURFACE DESIGN
The schematic representation of the dynamic metasurface is illustrated in Fig. 1. The switchable functionality operation between different types of beams is accomplished by setting different phase profiles through modification of the bias voltage applied to the varactor diodes.
Figure 1.Schematic of complex beams generation exploiting the versatile metasurface platform. Three complex beams, including zeroth-order Bessel beam, vortex beam, and Airy beam, are generated by judiciously implementing the predefined phase profiles.
A schematic view of the elementary tunable meta-atom is shown in Figs. 2(a) and 2(b). The meta-atom is composed of three metal layers separated by two dielectric substrates (
Figure 2.Schematic design of the addressable meta-atom incorporating a voltage-biased varactor diode. (a) 3D view. The inset shows the equivalent circuit of the meta-atom. (b) Exploded perspective view. The geometrical parameters are
Though a single metal via is required to bias the varactor diode in each meta-atom, 15 vias are integrated in the top dielectric substrate, where 14 of them are blind vias and a single one is connected to the voltage supply through the lower substrate layer, as highlighted in Fig. 2(b). As the location of each meta-atom is different on the metasurface, the location of the through via connected to the power supply to bias the varactor diode also changes. It is worthwhile to note that integration of the numerous blind vias in each meta-atom is absolutely necessary since the location of the through via connected to the power supply has an influence on the EM response of the latter meta-atom. By using blind vias in the top dielectric substrate, the influence of the location of the via on the EM response is then suppressed and allows for a negligible phase change when the position of the meta-atom changes on the metasurface. Therefore, the geometry above the quasi-continuous ground plane is fixed no matter the position of the meta-atom on the metasurface. In each meta-atom, 15 metal feed lines printed on the bottom face of the lower substrate are connected to the positive DC voltage, where only a single one is connected to the through via.
In order to investigate the performance of the electronically addressable meta-atom, both simulations and measurements are carried out in the frequency band ranging from 7 to 11 GHz. The numerical simulations are accomplished with the commercial software HFSS from ANSYS based on the finite element method (FEM). A Floquet port is used as a plane wave source, illuminating the unit cell and periodic boundaries set along both
Figure 3.Reflection response of the meta-atom versus the position variation
Based on the above designed meta-atom, we physically implement a dynamic metasurface platform composed of
Figure 4.Photographs of the dynamic metasurface. (a) Top face of the fabricated sample. Ultrathin absorbing sheets, represented by the gray material, are placed around the usable surface to eliminate parasitic reflections. (b) Bottom face of the sample containing the bias lines and flexible printed circuit (FPC) connectors. (c) Usable part of the metasurface whose size is
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A. Bessel Beam Generation
The Bessel beam, whose transverse intensity can be described by the Bessel functions of the first kind, is a nondiffracting beam. To generate the zeroth-order Bessel beam, the phase profile of an axicon lens is applied to satisfy the following equation [41]:
The phase profile described in Eq. (1) is implemented on the reconfigurable metasurface, which is illuminated by a plane wave with the electric field polarized along the
Figure 5.(a)–(c) Phase profiles for the zeroth-order Bessel beam generation at 8.5, 9, and 9.5 GHz. (d)–(k) Numerical and experimental results of the zeroth-order Bessel beam at 8.5, 9, and 9.5 GHz. (d)–(f) Simulated electric field magnitude distributions in
Meanwhile, far-field simulations and measurements are also carried out to validate the performances. For the far-field measurements, the setup consists of using a small horn antenna in the 8.2–12.4 GHz frequency operation 50 cm far from the metasurface as feeding source. The feeding horn and the metasurface are placed on a rotating plate, and a broadband horn antenna is placed at 6 m away at the receiving end to collect the electric-field data in the far-field zone. A single beam is observed at the boresight (0°) in the
B. Vortex Beam Generation
As a method to enhance the channel capacity of communication links, orbital angular momentum (OAM) carried by vortex beams has attracted a lot of attention owing to the additional spatial degree of freedom and to the perfect orthogonality between different states, which is considered a promising transmission technique. To generate vortex beams, the phase shift to be implemented on the metasurface is expressed as [6]
The simulated near-field results utilizing the phase profile depicted in Fig. 6(a) for mode
Figure 6.(a)–(c) Phase profiles for the generation of different types of vortex beams carrying OAM mode
C. Focusing OAM
To convert the illuminating wave into a focusing vortex beam carrying OAM, a parabolic phase profile along the radial direction is superposed to the vortex beam phase profile for the focusing mechanism. Thus, the total phase
The near-field patterns of the focusing vortex beam using the phase profile shown in Fig. 6(b) are depicted in Figs. 6(e) and 6(h) with a focal length
D. Nondiffracting Vortex Beam
A higher-order Bessel beam can be interpreted as a zeroth-order Bessel beam carrying an orbital angular momentum. By superposing the original vortex beam that is inherently divergent and a zeroth-order Bessel beam, a nondiffracting vortex beam, which has a concentrated energy distribution along the propagating direction, is achieved. The phase profile
The nondiffracting vortex beam is particularly interesting, as it provides a solution to the divergence drawback of vortex beams. For this purpose, the nondiffracting vortex beam with OAM mode
E. Airy Beam Generation
An Airy beam, whose main beam propagates along a curved parabolic trajectory, is another kind of nondiffracting beam. The form of the Airy wave packet is verified as a solution to the Schrödinger equation describing a free particle [50]. Due to its diffraction-free characteristics, the Airy beam carries infinite energy, which in an experimental way is quasi-impossible to demonstrate. To overcome this problem and generate the Airy beam in an experimental environment, an exponential decaying factor is introduced to ensure a containment of the infinite Airy tail, and, despite such adjustment, the truncated Airy beam still exhibits a nondiffracting characteristic [51]. A one-dimensional Airy beam has been achieved from static and reconfigurable metasurfaces using the different possible schemes of phase only or amplitude and phase simultaneously modulation [52–54]. However, a 2D Airy beam has only been generated from static metasurfaces [55]. Here, we propose to generate a 2D Airy beam from the reconfigurable metasurface. The 2D Airy beam can be implemented by the product of two 1D Airy beams accelerating along the
Figure 7 presents the results obtained for the implementation of a 2D Airy beam with parameters
Figure 7.(a) Phase profile for the generation of the 2D Airy beam with parameters
In addition to the above three complex beams, a plethora of other phase profiles, including beam splitting and hologram, can be considered and demonstrated from the elaborately designed dynamic metasurface. In a general manner, the proposed electronically reconfigurable metasurface can serve as a multitask platform to realize any functionality that can be implemented with a phase modulation. Besides, this reconfigurable metasurface is easy to integrate, which paves the way to construct software-controlled and intelligent meta-devices for the next generation of communication systems [57].
As a key factor to quantitatively evaluate the performances of the proposed metasurface platform for the different functionalities, the total efficiency is defined as the ratio of power carried by the complex beam
The efficiency is extracted from the experimental data in the
Comparison of Previous Studies on Multifunctional Metasurfaces
Ref. | Frequency Band (GHz) | Experimental Efficiency | Type | Electric Components | Phase Coverage | Individually Addressed |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T. Cai | 10.22–11.15 | 91% | Transmission/Reflection | – | 360° | – |
T. Cai | 8.4–11.2 | 90% | Reflection | – | 360° | – |
9.1–11.7 | 72% | Transmission | – | 360° | – | |
J. Y. Dai | 2.7–3.7 | – | Reflection | Varactor | 270° | No |
C. Qian | 6.7–9.2 | – | Reflection | Varactor | 360° | No |
K. Chen | 6.7–7.1 | 36% | Transmission | Varactor | No | |
Z. Wang | 5.5–6.0 | 20.7% | Reflection | Varactor | No | |
This work | 8.5–9.5 | 24.8%–42.5% | Reflection | Varactor | Yes |
The absorption can then be calculated as
4. CONCLUSIONS
In summary, we have presented a novel 2D reflective reconfigurable metasurface, whose varactor diode-loaded meta-atom can be individually controlled by an elaborately designed voltage bias system to deliver a continuous phase variation, which can achieve an approximately
Acknowledgment
Acknowledgment. R. Feng is supported in part by the Doctoral Students’ Long-Term Study Abroad Scholarship Fund of Xidian University and by the Chinese Scholarship Council.
References
[1] B. Ratni, A. de Lustrac, G.-P. Piau, S. N. Burokur. Electronic control of linear-to-circular polarization conversion using a reconfigurable metasurface. Appl. Phys. Lett., 111, 214101(2017).
[2] J. Xu, R. Li, J. Qin, S. Wang, T. Han. Ultra-broadband wide-angle linear polarization converter based on H-shaped metasurface. Opt. Express, 26, 20913-20919(2018).
[3] X. Huang, H. Yang, D. Zhang, Y. Luo. Ultrathin dual-band metasurface polarization converter. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 67, 4636-4641(2019).
[4] Y. Qi, B. Zhang, C. Liu, X. Deng. Ultra-broadband polarization conversion meta-surface and its application in polarization converter and RCS reduction. IEEE Access, 8, 116675-116684(2020).
[5] Q. Dai, Z. Li, L. Deng, N. Zhou, J. Deng, J. Tao, G. Zheng. Single-size nanostructured metasurface for dual-channel vortex beam generation. Opt. Lett., 45, 3773-3776(2020).
[6] K. Zhang, Y. Yuan, D. Zhang, X. Ding, B. Ratni, S. N. Burokur, M. Lu, K. Tang, Q. Wu. Phase-engineered metalenses to generate converging and non-diffractive vortex beam carrying orbital angular momentum in microwave region. Opt. Express, 26, 1351-1360(2018).
[7] B. Ratni, A. de Lustrac, G.-P. Piau, S. N. Burokur. Reconfigurable meta-mirror for wavefronts control: applications to microwave antennas. Opt. Express, 26, 2613-2624(2018).
[8] X. Fu, Y. Fan, J. Wang, Y. Li, M. Feng, H. Chen, W. Wang, J. Zhang, S. Qu. Ultra-wideband microwave absorber via an integrated metasurface and impedance-matching lattice design. J. Phys. D, 52, 31LT01(2019).
[9] Y. Kato, S. Morita, H. Shiomi, A. Sanada. Ultrathin perfect absorbers for normal incident waves using Dirac cone metasurfaces with critical external coupling. IEEE Microw. Wireless Compon. Lett., 30, 383-386(2020).
[10] Y. Li, A. Li, T. Cui, D. F. Sievenpiper. Multiwavelength multiplexing hologram designed using impedance metasurfaces. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 66, 6408-6413(2018).
[11] Z. Wang, X. Ding, K. Zhang, B. Ratni, S. N. Burokur, X. Gu, Q. Wu. Huygens metasurface holograms with the modulation of focal energy distribution. Adv. Opt. Mater., 6, 1800121(2018).
[12] H. Ren, X. Fang, J. Jang, J. Bürger, J. Rho, S. A. Maier. Complex-amplitude metasurface-based orbital angular momentum holography in momentum space. Nat. Nanotechnol., 15, 948-955(2020).
[13] C. Guan, J. Liu, X. Ding, Z. Wang, K. Zhang, H. Li, M. Jin, S. N. Burokur, Q. Wu. Dual-polarized multiplexed meta-holograms utilizing coding metasurface. Nanophotonics, 9, 3605-3613(2020).
[14] L. Zhang, R. Y. Wu, G. D. Bai, H. T. Wu, Q. Ma, X. Q. Chen, T. J. Cui. Transmission-reflection integrated multifunctional coding metasurface for full-space controls of electromagnetic waves. Adv. Funct. Mater., 28, 1802205(2018).
[15] T. Cai, G. M. Wang, S. W. Tang, H. X. Xu, J. W. Duan, H. J. Guo, F. X. Guan, S. L. Sun, Q. He, L. Zhou. High-efficiency and full-space manipulation of electromagnetic wave fronts with metasurfaces. Phys. Rev. Appl., 8, 034033(2017).
[16] T. Cai, S. W. Tang, G. M. Wang, H. X. Xu, S. L. Sun, Q. He, L. Zhou. High-performance bifunctional metasurfaces in transmission and reflection geometries. Adv. Opt. Mater., 5, 1600506(2016).
[17] Y. Yuan, K. Zhang, B. Ratni, Q. Song, X. Ding, Q. Wu, S. N. Burokur, P. Genevet. Independent phase modulation for quadruplex polarization channels enabled by chirality-assisted geometric-phase metasurfaces. Nat. Commun., 11, 4186(2020).
[18] Y. Yuan, S. Sun, Y. Chen, K. Zhang, X. Ding, B. Ratni, Q. Wu, S. N. Burokur, C.-W. Qiu. A fully phase-modulated metasurface as an energy-controllable circular polarization router. Adv. Sci., 7, 2001437(2020).
[19] M. Rahmani, L. Xu, A. E. Miroshnichenko, A. Komar, R. Camacho-Morales, H. Chen, Y. Zárate, S. Kruk, G. Zhang, D. N. Neshev, Y. S. Kivshar. Reversible thermal tuning of all-dielectric metasurfaces. Adv. Funct. Mater., 27, 1700580(2017).
[20] X. Liu, Q. Wang, X. Zhang, H. Li, Q. Xu, Y. Xu, X. Chen, S. Li, M. Liu, Z. Tian, C. Zhang, C. Zou, J. Han, W. Zhang. Thermally dependent dynamic meta-holography using a vanadium dioxide integrated metasurface. Adv. Opt. Mater., 7, 1900175(2019).
[21] K. Z. Kamali, L. Xu, J. Ward, K. Wang, G. Li, A. E. Miroshnichenko, D. Neshev, M. Rahmani. Reversible image contrast manipulation with thermally tunable dielectric metasurfaces. Small, 15, 1805142(2019).
[22] M. R. Shcherbakov, S. Liu, V. V. Zubyuk, A. Vaskin, P. P. Vabishchevich, G. Keeler, T. Pertsch, T. V. Dolgova, I. Staude, I. Brener. Ultrafast all-optical tuning of direct-gap semiconductor metasurfaces. Nat. Commun., 8, 17(2017).
[23] X. G. Zhang, W. X. Tang, W. X. Jiang, G. D. Bai, J. Tang, L. Bai, C.-W. Qiu, T. J. Cui. Digital metasurfaces: light-controllable digital coding metasurfaces. Adv. Sci., 5, 1801028(2018).
[24] Y. Zhou, X. Y. Hu, C. Li, H. Yang, Q. H. Gong. All-optical tunable dual Fano resonance in nonlinear metamaterials in optical communication range. J. Mod. Opt., 65, 1-7(2018).
[25] J. Valente, J. Y. Ou, E. Plum, I. J. Youngs, N. I. Zheludev. A magneto-electro-optical effect in a plasmonic nanowire material. Nat. Commun., 6, 7021(2015).
[26] S. M. Kamali, E. Arbabi, A. Arbabi, Y. Horie, A. Faraon. Highly tunable elastic dielectric metasurface lenses. Laser Photon. Rev., 10, 1002-1008(2016).
[27] B. Gupta, S. Pandey, A. Nahata, T. Zhang, A. Nahata. Bistable physical geometries for terahertz plasmonic structures using shape memory alloys. Adv. Opt. Mater., 5, 1601008(2017).
[28] H. S. Ee, R. Agarwal. Tunable metasurface and flat optical zoom lens on a stretchable substrate. Nano Lett., 16, 2818-2823(2016).
[29] T. Roy, S. Zhang, I. W. Jung, M. Troccoli, F. Capasso, D. Lopez. Dynamic metasurface lens based on MEMS technology. APL Photon., 3, 021302(2018).
[30] E. Arbabi, A. Arbabi, S. M. Kamali, Y. Horie, M. Faraji-Dana, A. Faraon. MEMS-tunable dielectric metasurface lens. Nat. Commun., 9, 812(2018).
[31] Y. W. Huang, H. W. Lee, R. Sokhoyan, R. A. Pala, K. Thyagarajan, S. Han, D. P. Tsai, H. A. Atwater. Gate-tunable conducting oxide metasurfaces. Nano Lett., 16, 5319-5325(2016).
[32] J. Hwang, J. W. Roh. Electrically tunable two-dimensional metasurfaces at near-infrared wavelengths. Opt. Express, 25, 25071-25078(2017).
[33] Y. Li, J. Lin, H. Guo, W. Sun, S. Xiao, L. Zhou. A tunable metasurface with switchable functionalities: from perfect transparency to perfect absorption. Adv. Opt. Mater., 8, 1901548(2020).
[34] Y. Chai, H. Deng, Q. Xiong. A dynamically phase tunable metasurface for a broad bandwidth ultra-low radar cross section. IEEE Access, 8, 53006-53017(2020).
[35] A. de Lustrac, B. Ratni, G.-P. Piau, Y. Duval, S. N. Burokur. Tri-state metasurface-based electromagnetic screen with switchable reflection, transmission, and absorption functionalities. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater., 3, 1184-1190(2021).
[36] X. Bai, F. Kong, Y. Sun, G. Wang, J. Qian, X. Li, A. Cao, C. He, X. Liang, R. Jin, W. Zhu. High-efficiency transmissive programmable metasurface for multimode OAM generation. Adv. Opt. Mater., 8, 2000570(2020).
[37] X. Wan, M. Q. Qi, T. Y. Chen, T. J. Cui. Field-programmable beam reconfiguring based on digitally controlled coding metasurface. Sci. Rep., 6, 20663(2016).
[38] T. J. Cui, M. Q. Qi, X. Wan, J. Zhao, Q. Cheng. Coding metamaterials, digital metamaterials and programming metamaterials. Light Sci. Appl., 3, e218(2014).
[39] H. Yang, X. Cao, F. Yang, J. Gao, S. Xu, M. Li, X. Chen, Y. Zhao, Y. Zheng, S. Li. A programmable metasurface with dynamic polarization, scattering and focusing control. Sci. Rep., 6, 35692(2016).
[40] C. Huang, C. Zhang, J. Yang, B. Sun, B. Zhao, X. Luo. Reconfigurable metasurface for multifunctional control of electromagnetic waves. Adv. Opt. Mater., 5, 1700485(2017).
[41] R. Feng, B. Ratni, J. Yi, Z. Jiang, H. Zhang, A. de Lustrac, S. N. Burokur. Flexible manipulation of Bessel-like beams with a reconfigurable metasurface. Adv. Opt. Mater., 8, 2001084(2020).
[42] H.-X. Xu, S. Tang, S. Ma, W. Luo, T. Cai, S. Sun, Q. He, L. Zhou. Tunable microwave metasurfaces for high-performance operations: dispersion compensation and dynamical switch. Sci. Rep., 6, 38255(2016).
[43] V. Popov, B. Ratni, S. N. Burokur, F. Boust. Non-local reconfigurable sparse metasurface: efficient near-field and far-field wavefront manipulations. Adv. Opt. Mater., 9, 202001316(2021).
[44] B. Liu, Y. He, S.-W. Wong, Y. Li. Multifunctional vortex beam generation by a dynamic reflective metasurface. Adv. Opt. Mater., 9, 2001689(2020).
[45] J. Y. Dai, J. Zhao, Q. Cheng, T. J. Cui. Independent control of harmonic amplitudes and phases via a time-domain digital coding metasurface. Light Sci. Appl., 7, 90(2018).
[46] C. Qian, B. Zheng, Y. Shen, L. Jing, E. Li, L. Shen, H. Chen. Deep-learning-enabled self-adaptive microwave cloak without human intervention. Nat. Photonics, 14, 383-390(2020).
[47] K. Chen, Y. Feng, F. Monticone, J. Zhao, B. Zhu, T. Jiang, L. Zhang, Y. Kim, X. Ding, S. Zhang, A. Alù, C.-W. Qiu. A reconfigurable active Huygens’ metalens. Adv. Mater., 29, 1606422(2017).
[48] Z. Wang, D. Liao, T. Zhang, T. Chen, Y. Ruan, B. Zheng. Metasurface-based focus-tunable mirror. Opt. Express, 27, 30332-30339(2019).
[49] http://www.enprobe.de/products_FO-Antennas.htm. http://www.enprobe.de/products_FO-Antennas.htm
[50] M. V. Berry, N. L. Balazs. Nonspreading wave packets. Am. J. Phys., 47, 264-267(1979).
[51] R. Feng, B. Ratni, J. Yi, K. Zhang, X. Ding, H. Zhang, A. de Lustrac, S. N. Burokur. Versatile Airy-beam generation using a 1-bit coding programmable reflective metasurface. Phys. Rev. Appl., 14, 014081(2020).
[52] E. Song, G. Lee, H. Park, K. Lee, J. Kim, J. Hong, H. Kim, B. Lee. Compact generation of Airy beams with C-aperture metasurface. Adv. Opt. Mater., 5, 1601028(2017).
[53] H. Li, W. Hao, X. Yin, S. Chen, L. Chen. Broadband generation of Airy beams with hyperbolic metamaterials. Adv. Opt. Mater., 7, 1900493(2019).
[54] Q. Fan, D. Wang, P. Huo, Z. Zhang, Y. Liang, T. Xu. Autofocusing Airy beams generated by all-dielectric metasurface for visible light. Opt. Express, 25, 9285-9294(2017).
[55] Z.-W. Miao, Z.-C. Hao, B.-B. Jin, Z. N. Chen. Low-profile 2-D THz Airy beam generator using the phase-only reflective metasurface. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 68, 1503-1513(2019).
[56] Y. Huang, J. Li, H.-X. Xu, H. Yu, Z. Yang, P. Yu, W. Hu, D. Inserra, G. Wen. Experimental demonstration of microwave two-dimensional Airy beam generation based on single-layer metasurface. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 68, 7507-7516(2020).
[57] C. Liaskos, S. Nie, A. Tsioliaridou, A. Pitsillides, S. Ioannidis, I. Akyildiz. A new wireless communication paradigm through software-controlled metasurfaces. IEEE Commun. Mag., 56, 162-169(2018).

Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address