Author Affiliations
School of Data Science and Technology, North University of China, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030051, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Main flow chart of proposed algorithm
Fig. 2. Registration results of Bunny000 and Bunny045. (a) Initial position; (b) registering using method of Ref. [11]; (c) registering using method of Ref. [21]; (d) registering using proposed method
Fig. 3. Registration results of Dragon000 and Dragon024. (a) Initial position; (b) registering using method of Ref. [11]; (c) registering using method of Ref. [21]; (d) registering using proposed method
Fig. 4. Registration results of Bunny045 and Bunny090. (a) Initial position; (b) registering using method of Ref. [11]; (c) registering using method of Ref. [21]; (d) registering using proposed method
Fig. 5. Registration results of Dragon000 and Dragon048. (a) Initial position; (b) registering using method of Ref. [11]; (c) registering using method of Ref. [21]; (d) registering using proposed method
Fig. 6. Registration results of Happy048 and Happy096. (a) Initial position; (b) registering using method of Ref. [11]; (c) registering using method of Ref. [21]; (d) registering using proposed method
Fig. 7. Registration results of Chair1 and Chair2. (a) Initial point cloud 1; (b) initial point cloud 2; (c) registering using proposed method
Fig. 8. Registration results of Motobike1 and Motobike2. (a) Initial point cloud 1; (b) initial point cloud 2; (c) registering using proposed method
Point cloud | Registration algorithm | LCP | Running time /s |
---|
| Go-ICP | 0.760 | 73.00 | | Super4PCS | 0.861 | 31.25 | Bunny000 and Bunny045 | Method of Ref. [11] | 0.930 | 10.05 | | Method of Ref. [21] | 0.964 | 12.98 | | Proposed method | 0.979 | 12.27 | | Go-ICP | 0.728 | 63.50 | | Super4PCS | 0.803 | 23.74 | Dragon000 and Dragon024 | Method of Ref. [11] | 0.806 | 13.85 | | Method of Ref. [21] | 0.875 | 12.15 | | Proposed method | 0.920 | 11.80 |
|
Table 1. Comparison of point cloud registration results with high overlap rate
Point cloud | Registration algorithm | LCP | Running time /s |
---|
| Go-ICP | 0.598 | 95.55 | | Super4PCS | 0.676 | 35.89 | Bunny045 and Bunny090 | Method of Ref. [11] | 0.725 | 13.76 | | Method of Ref. [21] | 0.783 | 12.23 | | Proposed method | 0.834 | 12.09 | | Go-ICP | 0.479 | 83.43 | | Super4PCS | 0.559 | 32.96 | Dragon000 and Dragon048 | Method of Ref. [11] | 0.587 | 17.49 | | Method of Ref. [21] | 0.493 | 8.34 | | Proposed method | 0.756 | 13.92 | | Go-ICP | 0.399 | 67.05 | | Super4PCS | 0.414 | 23.37 | Happy045 and Happy090 | Method of Ref. [11] | 0.459 | 15.86 | | Method of Ref. [21] | 0.472 | 8.12 | | Proposed method | 0.728 | 10.45 |
|
Table 2. Comparison of point cloud registration results with low overlap rate
Point cloud | LCP | Running time /s |
---|
Chair1 and Chair2 | 0.804 | 12.49 | Motobike1 and Motobike2 | 0.773 | 11.15 |
|
Table 3. Registration performance of real 3D scan data