Author Affiliations
1Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel2Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel3Department of Electro-Optical Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israelshow less
Fig. 1. Experimental setup of the upconversion detection: (a) schematic, (b) picture.
Fig. 2. Detected signal from the photodetector (signal A, 76 mV peak to peak) and modulation signal of the MMW/THz radiation (signal B) on the same time axis.
Fig. 3. Detected signal from the photodetector (solid line) and the detected signal from the electronic circuit without amplifier (dashed line) as a function of the GDD DC bias current.
Fig. 4. Detected signal from the photodetector (signal A) and modulation signal of the MMW/THz radiation (signal B). The response time of the detection using the PDB210A photodetector was found to be 480 ns.
Fig. 5. Setup configuration for the upconversion imaging system using a GDD and photodetector.
Fig. 6. Pictures of the setup configuration for the upconversion imaging system using a GDD and photodetector, imaging mirror, and metal object with a size of 8 cm×10 cm and letter width of 2 cm.
Fig. 7. Imaging results: (a) the raw upconverted MMW/THz image, (b) the image after thresholding low values.
Fig. 8. Setup configuration for an optical FMCW experiment at 100 GHz using a photodetector and GDD lamp N523 in side configuration, connected to the detection electronic circuit and external amplifier.
Fig. 9. Detected signal A and modulation signal B for the FMCW experiment: (a) upconversion optical heterodyne detection, (b) electronic heterodyne detection.
Fig. 10. FFT of the detected signal from the FMCW experiment: (a) upconversion optical heterodyne detection, (b) electronic heterodyne detection.