Fig. 1. Spectral density evolution of partially coherent elliptical vortex beam propagation in vacuum (). (a) Elliptic rate ; (b); (c)
Fig. 2. Spectral density evolution of partially coherent elliptical vortex beam propagation through anisotropic non-Kolmogorov turbulence. (a) ; (b); (c)
Fig. 3. Spectral density of partially coherent elliptical vortex beam () with different coherence lengths after 1 km transmission. (a)‒(d) Vacuum; (e)‒(h) anisotropic non-Kolmogorov turbulence
Fig. 4. Spectral density of partially coherent elliptical vortex beam () propagation through non-Kolmogorov turbulence with different anisotropic factors after 1 km transmission. (a)‒(c) anisotropic factors with 1,3,5; (d) normalized spectral density
Fig. 5. Spectral coherence distribution of partially coherent elliptical vortex beam propagation through different medium. (a) Vacuum; (b)(c) anisotropic non-Kolmogorov turbulence
Fig. 6. Curves of and for partially coherent elliptical vortex beam propagation through turbulence, solid line is , dash line is . (a) ,500 m transmission;(b) ,1 km transmission;(c) ,500 m transmission;(d),1 km transmission
Fig. 7. Position evolution of the coherent vortex point for partially coherent elliptical vortex beam propagation through turbulence. (a)(c) x direction; (b)(d) y direction
Fig. 8. Relationship between the interference term of anisotropic non-Kolmogorov turbulence and the power index of the turbulence spectrum
α | δ=0.5 cm | δ=1 cm | δ=5 cm | ∞(completely coherent) |
---|
0.2 | 222 | 438 | 770 | 798 | 1 | 221 | 440 | 773 | 799 | 3 | 251 | 466 | 795 | 817 | 5 | 285 | 533 | 837 | 853 | 7 | 334 | 595 | 889 | 905 |
|
Table 1. Conservation distance under different ellipticity and coherence length
| | | | 0(vacuum) |
---|
/m | 379 | 775 | 1401 | 1801 | | 3.01 | 3.06 | 3.2 | 3.8 | /m | 865 | 759 | 893 | 1791 | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | /m | 391 | 605 | 778 | 1049 |
|
Table 2. Conservation distance under different turbulence parameters
| (1 cm, 1 cm) | (1 cm, 3 cm) | (1 cm, 5 cm) | (2 cm, 2 cm) |
---|
zc /m | 251 | 287 | 318 | 358 | | (3 cm, 1 cm) | (3 cm, 3 cm) | (3 cm, 5 cm) | (5 cm, 3 cm) | zc /m | 383 | 408 | 426 | 469 |
|
Table 3. Conservation distance at different reference points ()