Abstract
1. INTRODUCTION
In the past few years, time-variant metamaterials/metasurfaces have become a hot research topic within the photonics community, given their potential to boost the degree of manipulation of light–matter interactions achieved by their time-invariant predecessors. The latter, through the subwavelength space modulation of the electric and/or magnetic response [1], allow for alluring possibilities in the way light is controlled and thus enable a vast range of interesting phenomena and promising applications from strengthened nonlinearities [2] and -near-zero (ENZ) propagation [3,4] to artificial Faraday rotation [5] and optically driven topological states [6]. On the other hand, an externally induced time modulation in some of the properties of these engineered structures largely broadens the degree of harnessing of light manipulation, in which case we have a time-varying metamaterial. This spatiotemporal modulation is the supporting platform of such fascinating effects as magnetless nonreciprocity [7] or time reversal [8], just to name a few. In this regard, the research on active metasurfaces has gained a lot of momentum in the past few years [9–12].
One avenue to induce this temporal variation is the time modulation of a medium’s dielectric function, e.g., electro-optically. In Ref. [13], a nonstationary interface was reported from plasma ionization by a high-power electromagnetic pulse. The problem of wave propagation in an unbounded medium with a rapid change—and, to a lesser extent, a slab with sinusoidal time variation—in its constitutive parameters was first theoretically studied in Ref. [14] for the case of nondispersive permittivity and/or permeability. These nondispersive step transients, further explored in Refs. [15,16], effectively produce a “time interface”: based on the continuity of and , an instantaneous frequency shift occurs to accommodate the new permittivity while preserving the wave momentum, and a forward wave and a backward wave arise whose amplitudes are quantified by what can be seen as the temporal dual Fresnel coefficients. These step-like discontinuities were later analyzed, e.g., in a half-space [17] and a dielectric layer [18]. Moreover, Refs. [19,20] addressed the adiabatic frequency conversion of optical pulses going through slabs with arbitrarily time-varying refractive index, while Refs. [21,22] reported wave solutions for a smooth or arbitrary transition of the refractive index, respectively. Wave propagation undergoing periodic temporal inhomogeneities of the permittivity has also been investigated in a half-space [23], a slab [24–29], or a space-time-periodic (traveling-wave modulation) medium [30–33]: time-periodic variations exhibit frequency-periodic band-structured dispersion relations that include wave vector gaps [26], dual bandgaps of space-periodic media. As shown in Refs. [24,25,29,34–37], this time-Floquet modulation can be harnessed to achieve parametric amplifiers.
Nonetheless, most of the aforementioned works consider nondispersive susceptibilities only (excepting Refs. [17,18], where a plasma is parameterized with a nonstationary electron density, and Ref. [23], where the time-varying parameter is conductivity). In Ref. [38], on the contrary, closed-form Green’s functions are obtained for pulsed excitations within spatially homogeneous media with abrupt or gradual temporal changes, either without dispersion or considering a cold ionized lossless plasma described with Drude dispersion. Very recently, the question of time-varying dispersion has been studied from different angles, namely, a transmission line [39] and a meta-atom [40] with time-modulated reactive loads, and the analysis of the instantaneous radiation of nonharmonic dipole moments [41] and nonstationary Drude–Lorentz polarizabilities [42].
Sign up for Photonics Research TOC. Get the latest issue of Photonics Research delivered right to you!Sign up now
In the present work, we assume an initial plane wave at with frequency and bring in the effects of Lorentzian dispersion when considering a step-like change in the plasma frequency with otherwise constant resonance frequency . Unlike in Refs. [14–16], this abrupt change gives rise to two shifted frequencies (in the simplified lossless case, a lower frequency and an upper frequency ) that bear the following interpretation when is considerably larger than : while reflects in essence the change in permittivity similarly to the nondispersive case, characterizes a wave of a different nature, viz. one that has a negligible magnetic component; the medium at thus possesses ENZ characteristics.
We begin by defining in Section 2 the differential equation describing the Lorentzian-like dielectric response characterizing our time-varying medium to further derive the initial conditions across the temporal change in at . This transition is perceived as abruptly varying the volumetric density of -resonating dipoles , our control parameter. As a starting point, we mainly look into the case where this number changes from zero to a specified value . From the differential equation relating the polarization vector to the electric field , we show that , , and are all continuous across the temporal discontinuity at . In Section 3 we use preservation of momentum to analytically find and and also give a detailed numerical account for the evolution of the frequency split over time when the transition is gradual rather than abrupt. A dynamic analysis toward a full-wave solution is developed in Section 4 for a lossless scenario. The approach is first based, in Section 4.A, on the scattering-parameter model from Ref. [16]. It is further substantiated—and confirmed—in Section 4.B by a Laplace-transform-based first-principles solution to the amplitudes for the forward and backward propagating constituents at and ; this comprehensive development also recovers and . Furthermore, we developed a finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) [43] solver whose simulation results perfectly agree with our analytical predictions. In Section 5, we show how this one-dimensional spatial problem may be likened to a transmission line equivalent that is relatively simple to use. Further phenomena related to losses are described in Section 6. Finally, conclusions are drawn in Section 7.
2. TIME-VARYING LORENTZIAN DISPERSION: INITIAL CONDITIONS
Let us consider, for , an -polarized electric field plane wave traveling in the direction and oscillating at a purely real frequency in an unbounded dispersive medium (for simplicity, we will assume it lossless for now) whose electric polarization charge responds to the electric field following a susceptibility that can be described in the frequency domain by a Lorentzian resonance centered at , such that
Now, let us allow —and thus —to be time dependent and consider a scenario where it abruptly changes—instantaneously and homogeneously—at as , with and , some arbitrary positive constants. After defining , Eq. (2) becomes
Importantly, the depicted situation differs from the model assumed in Ref. [42], where . Formally, our continuity of both and across can be substantiated as follows. Applying the one-sided Laplace transform , defined over the temporal interval , to Eq. (3), and solving for , we have
Similarly, for ,
However, by virtue of Eq. (8) and substituting Eq. (6) with the understanding that , we find that is continuous as well:
Finally, the Laplace-domain polarization emerges when as
3. KINEMATICS: PRESERVATION OF MOMENTUM
The existence of dispersion does not change the fact that, as dictated by electromagnetic momentum conservation, the new waves arising after the temporal boundary must be shifted in frequency with respect to , as shown in Refs. [14–16] for a nondispersive scenario. Our initial wave oscillating at has a wavenumber so, after the temporal jump, the supported new frequencies will be those that satisfy the equality . This leads, when there is no magnetic response, to the transcendental equation , which in our lossless case can be written, when and thus the relative dielectric permittivity , as
Squaring both sides of Eq. (12) leads to a quartic polynomial equation in whose four roots determine the new frequencies for :
For definiteness, we will choose for and for such that () when (): note that only in the interval of anomalous dispersion, which we will not address and for which , do we get complex solutions—more precisely, purely real (imaginary) (). Specializing Eq. (12) to the case (the medium is vacuum for ), we have the following characteristic equation for :
In order to illustrate how the frequencies evolve from to , let us for a moment assume that , with some constant describing the transition rate [in the limit , we have ]. In Fig. 1(a), we consider a transition from vacuum () to a Lorentzian-like medium with chosen such that , and with . As soon as , splits into the pair . This is understood once we make in Eq. (12) and take the limit : in addition to the trivial solution , we also have , which in this case is equal to 0.25. Physically, this is just the manifestation of the natural frequency of the newly added oscillators, which may surface depending on the boundary conditions.
Figure 1.(a) Temporal evolution of
Now, we could think of “quantizing” and consider the entire continuous transition as a succession of infinitesimal step-function-like temporal discontinuities. By doing this, we next go on by applying Eq. (12) twice in our second temporal jump, with both itself and as the input frequencies: it turns out that and are interrelated such that they both give rise to the same pair of output frequencies, so, notably, there is a pair [blue and red solid lines in Fig. 1(a)]. This interrelation shows up in that or, alternatively—from the mentioned transcendental equation , with and —, allowing us to further write and . Of course, by making , our original is instantaneously split into the final values of , whereas making finite alters the dynamics of the problem: we have a transient and thus the amplitudes of the final forward and backward waves will be different. In addition, Fig. 1(b) shows the graphical match of momentum from the dispersion diagram of our Lorentzian when the blue solid line crosses the dashed black line .
4. DYNAMICS: PLANE WAVE(S) IN A TIME-VARYING LORENTZIAN MEDIUM
A. Temporal-Interface Scattering Coefficients
In order to find the electromagnetic fields after the temporal discontinuity at , we need to solve the wave equation subject to the temporal boundary conditions (BCs), including those stated at the end of Section 2. One can find in the literature [14–16] that, in a nondispersive medium, it suffices to consider temporal continuity for both and , which ensures that magnetic and electric fields and remain bounded, respectively: and . This latter condition obviously becomes when magnetism is not present. In our case these two still apply, but two extra BCs are needed to determine the amplitudes of the forward and backward waves for both frequencies ( and ): we can now use the fact—remarked upon in Section 2—that and , where, e.g., stands for to reduce notation. Importantly, the joint continuities of and lead to the continuity of : these three conditions are linearly dependent, so we choose to discard .
If we adopt the time-harmonic convention and use , our initial forward waves can be written as [note that, in order to simplify notation, stands for ], e.g.,
Let us now see the complex space-time harmonic dependencies from a different perspective and adopt the space-harmonic complex dependence , in which case forward and backward waves will be described by and , respectively. For , the fields can be expressed as
In Fig. 2(a) we show the temporal evolution of the electromagnetic waves at around the temporal jump (at , indicated with black dashed lines) that results from Eqs. (12)–(20) when we consider the transition of Fig. 1 (the results obtained from FDTD simulations—marked with circles—when follows the previously mentioned profile perfectly converge to these results as we make larger. Here we use , with ).
Figure 2.(a) Electromagnetic waves versus time at
Although less practical from a mathematical standpoint than the unilateral Laplace transform (see Appendix D) in this case, perhaps taking the Fourier transform () of over the whole time interval helps reveal the transient nature of our discontinuity. Taking for simplicity, from Eqs. (17a) and (18a), the spectrum of becomes
1. Approximations for
Now, let us ask ourselves what happens when increases, in which case we have to consider two different scenarios. In Figs. 2(b1) and 2(b2), we keep fixed with the value that makes when and increase the ratio : as this ratio tends to , we have and [Fig. 2(b1)], which makes [see Fig. 2(b2)]. Noting that , this means the initial plane wave is not altered by the temporal discontinuity, as one would expect from the fact that, given that the new medium is effectively transparent at , no transfer of energy should take place between and .
On the contrary, in Figs. 2(c1) and 2(c2) we consider that varies such that regardless of [see constant black dashed line in Fig. 2(c1)]: by making , we now have and
B. First-Principles Approach: Use of Laplace Transform
From Maxwell’s equations with a general polarization vector,
Transforming into the Laplace domain, taking into account Eqs. (8) and (10) and restricting ourselves to ,
Now combine Eq. (25) with the constitutive relation Eq. (11) to obtain
Let us take the one dimensional reduction of Eq. (24) with . In view of preservation of momentum we take throughout. Also, , so from
The denominator of Eq. (29) can be factored as
For , the electric field is given as . At the time ,
We are now able to rewrite Eq. (29) in the form
An inverse transform of Eq. (32) for the source-free case yields
A corresponding approximation for the magnetic field is then
5. TRANSMISSION-LINE MODEL
The time-varying Lorentzian response described in Eq. (3) can be viewed as the (polarization) charge response to an applied voltage across a series time-varying LC circuit and thus rewritten as
6. LOSSY CASE
If we introduce loss into our time-varying Lorentzian medium, Eqs. (3) and (37) must be extended as
Figure 3.Transmission-line equivalence of our unbounded time-varying dispersive medium. At
Figure 4.(a) Dispersion diagram in the complex
Figure 5.(a) Electromagnetic waves versus time at
If we keep increasing , we will reach a critical point ( in Fig. 4) at which the second pair of complex frequencies collapses into the same purely imaginary frequency , so one can think of this pair as the two equal characteristic roots of some critically damped RLC oscillator. Propagation for is obviously forbidden, with purely real and negative [see Fig. 4(c)], and the waves will have the form . Also, assuming , in general we have . Further, if is increased beyond the point of critical damping, is split into two different purely imaginary frequencies, as corresponds to an overdamped RLC oscillator, which we will denote and (the retrieval of the temporal-interface scattering coefficients is described in Appendix B). This time-decaying non-propagating nature associated with and is illustrated in the overdamped scenario of Fig. 6 (); see red and green plots in Figs. 6(b) and 6(c). Finally, Fig. 7 depicts the evolution of the scattering coefficients with and how ( after the critical point) remains bounded, despite these coefficients separately diverging.
Figure 6.Same as Fig.
Figure 7.Real and imaginary parts of the complex amplitude coefficients versus
Incidentally, only when do we have and (and and in the underdamped case). In general, for , the characteristic roots and will approximately, but not exactly, form a complex conjugate pair. As a consequence, , meaning that forward and backward waves do not propagate in the very same medium.
7. CONCLUSION
We investigate the “reflection/transmission” of a monochromatic plane wave at a dispersive temporal boundary, substantiated as a step-like change in the plasma frequency of a Lorentz-type dielectric function, and we present a transmission-line equivalent modeling this transition. The fact that two frequencies rather than one, each with forward and backward propagating constituents, are instantaneously generated after the transition is in line with the second-order nature of the dispersion in the medium. When we omit loss, we can still connect this behavior with the well-known dispersionless case and show how, as increases, the lower frequency tends to the dispersionless solution, whereas the upper frequency , linked to , presents a markedly different phenomenon: not only does the medium acquire ENZ character at , but also the forward and backward waves’ amplitudes tend to converge, effectively constituting a standing wave along which, in the limit of negligible loss, almost instantaneously fades out. Importantly, one can see from the mathematics developed that the described analogy, exemplified in this work for a transition from free space, also holds for the inverse transition to free space, or any other transition for that matter. In an upcoming study, the issue of power storage/conveyance and conversion will be addressed in depth, but it is already evident from the above discussion that, in the limit, no power propagates at .
APPENDIX A: SCATTERING COEFFICIENTS FOR THE LOSSLESS SCENARIO IN TERMS OF ω
We can substitute in Eq. (
Note that, as the elements of the right-hand side are all equal, this system is perfectly conditioned for numerical solving. The expressions for the unknown amplitudes in Eq. (
APPENDIX B: SCATTERING COEFFICIENTS IN A LOSSY OVERDAMPED SCENARIO
Given that we now have purely imaginary and , which describe no propagation, the coefficients and are replaced with and . The matrix system of equations becomes
APPENDIX C: ADDING A SMALL LOSS WHEN ω0→∞
We saw in Section
Figure 8.(a1) Normalized real and imaginary parts of the complex frequencies
Figure 9.(a) Electromagnetic waves versus time at
APPENDIX D: SATISFACTION OF PARSEVAL’S THEOREM
We herein show how one can still find a form of the Parseval–Plancherel theorem [
Finally, we can write, for our double-sided signal , the energy equality
References
[1] N. Engheta, R. W. Ziolkowski. Metamaterials: Physics and Engineering Explorations(2006).
[2] T. Tanabe, M. Notomi, H. Taniyama, E. Kuramochi. Dynamic release of trapped light from an ultrahigh-
[3] M. Silveirinha, N. Engheta. Tunneling of electromagnetic energy through subwavelength channels and bends using
[4] B. Edwards, A. Alù, M. E. Young, M. Silveirinha, N. Engheta. Experimental verification of epsilon-near-zero metamaterial coupling and energy squeezing using a microwave waveguide. Phys. Rev. Lett., 100, 033903(2008).
[5] T. Kodera, D. L. Sounas, C. Caloz. Artificial faraday rotation using a ring metamaterial structure without static magnetic field. Appl. Phys. Lett., 99, 031114(2011).
[6] M. A. Gorlach, X. Ni, D. A. Smirnova, D. Korobkin, D. Zhirihin, A. P. Slobozhanyuk, P. A. Belov, A. Alù, A. B. Khanikaev. Far-field probing of leaky topological states in all-dielectric metasurfaces. Nat. Commun., 9, 909(2018).
[7] Z. Yu, S. Fan. Complete optical isolation created by indirect interband photonic transitions. Nat. Photonics, 3, 91-94(2009).
[8] V. Bacot, M. Labousse, A. Eddi, M. Fink, E. Fort. Time reversal and holography with spacetime transformations. Nat. Phys., 12, 972-977(2016).
[9] A. M. Shaltout, V. M. Shalaev, M. L. Brongersma. Spatiotemporal light control with active metasurfaces. Science, 364, eaat3100(2019).
[10] K. Chen, Y. Feng, F. Monticone, J. Zhao, B. Zhu, T. Jiang, L. Zhang, Y. Kim, X. Ding, S. Zhang, A. Alù, C.-W. Qiu. A reconfigurable active Huygens’ metalens. Adv. Mater., 29, 1606422(2017).
[11] K. Lee, J. Son, J. Park, B. Kang, W. Jeon, F. Rotermund, B. Min. Linear frequency conversion via sudden merging of meta-atoms in time-variant metasurfaces. Nat. Photonics, 12, 765-773(2018).
[12] L. Zhang, X. Q. Chen, R. W. Shao, J. Y. Dai, Q. Cheng, G. Castaldi, V. Galdi, T. J. Cui. Breaking reciprocity with space-time-coding digital metasurfaces. Adv. Mater., 31, 1904069(2019).
[13] E. Yablonovitch. Self-phase modulation of light in a laser-breakdown plasma. Phys. Rev. Lett., 32, 1101-1104(1974).
[14] F. R. Morgenthaler. Velocity modulation of electromagnetic waves. IRE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 6, 167-172(1958).
[15] Y. Xiao, D. N. Maywar, G. P. Agrawal. Reflection and transmission of electromagnetic waves at a temporal boundary. Opt. Lett., 39, 574-577(2014).
[16] C. Caloz, Z. Deck-Léger. Spacetime metamaterials-part ii: theory and applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 68, 1583-1598(2020).
[17] R. L. Fante. Transmission of electromagnetic waves into time-varying media. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 19, 417-424(1971).
[18] R. L. Fante. On the propagation of electromagnetic waves through a time-varying dielectric layer. Appl. Sci. Res., 27, 341-354(1973).
[19] Y. Xiao, G. P. Agrawal, D. N. Maywar. Spectral and temporal changes of optical pulses propagating through time-varying linear media. Opt. Lett., 36, 505-507(2011).
[20] Y. Xiao, D. N. Maywar, G. P. Agrawal. Optical pulse propagation in dynamic Fabry–Perot resonators. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 28, 1685-1692(2011).
[21] A. G. Hayrapetyan, J. B. Gãtte, K. K. Grigoryan, S. Fritzsche, R. G. Petrosyan. Electromagnetic wave propagation in spatially homogeneous yet smoothly time-varying dielectric media. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 178, 158-166(2016).
[22] M. Chegnizadeh, K. Mehrany, M. Memarian. General solution to wave propagation in media undergoing arbitrary transient or periodic temporal variations of permittivity. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 35, 2923-2932(2018).
[23] F. A. Harfoush, A. Taflove. Scattering of electromagnetic waves by a material half-space with a time-varying conductivity. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 39, 898-906(1991).
[24] D. Holberg, K. Kunz. Parametric properties of fields in a slab of time-varying permittivity. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 14, 183-194(1966).
[25] D. E. Holberg, K. S. Kunz. Parametric properties of dielectric slabs with large permittivity modulation. Radio Sci., 3, 273-286(1968).
[26] J. R. Zurita-Sánchez, P. Halevi, J. C. Cervantes-González. Reflection and transmission of a wave incident on a slab with a time-periodic dielectric function
[27] J. R. Zurita-Sánchez, J. H. Abundis-Patiño, P. Halevi. Pulse propagation through a slab with time-periodic dielectric function
[28] J. S. Martnez-Romero, P. Halevi. Standing waves with infinite group velocity in a temporally periodic medium. Phys. Rev. A, 96, 063831(2017).
[29] J. S. Martnez-Romero, P. Halevi. Parametric resonances in a temporal photonic crystal slab. Phys. Rev. A, 98, 053852(2018).
[30] J. Simon. Action of a progressive disturbance on a guided electromagnetic wave. IRE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 8, 18-29(1960).
[31] A. A. Oliner, A. Hessel. Wave propagation in a medium with a progressive sinusoidal disturbance. IRE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 9, 337-343(1961).
[32] R. S. Chu, T. Tamir. Wave propagation and dispersion in space-time periodic media. Proc. Inst. Electr. Eng., 119, 797-806(1972).
[33] R. L. Fante. Optical propagation in space–time-modulated media using many-space-scale perturbation theory. J. Opt. Soc. Am., 62, 1052-1060(1972).
[34] T. T. Koutserimpas, R. Fleury. Electromagnetic waves in a time periodic medium with step-varying refractive index. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 66, 5300-5307(2018).
[35] T. T. Koutserimpas, A. Alù, R. Fleury. Parametric amplification and bidirectional invisibility in PT-symmetric time-Floquet systems. Phys. Rev. A, 97, 013839(2018).
[36] T. T. Koutserimpas, R. Fleury. Nonreciprocal gain in non-Hermitian time-Floquet systems. Phys. Rev. Lett., 120, 087401(2018).
[37] T. T. Koutserimpas, R. Fleury. Electromagnetic fields in a time-varying medium: exceptional points and operator symmetries. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 68, 6717-6724(2020).
[38] L. Felsen, G. Whitman. Wave propagation in time-varying media. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 18, 242-253(1970).
[39] M. Mirmoosa, G. Ptitcyn, V. Asadchy, S. Tretyakov. Time-varying reactive elements for extreme accumulation of electromagnetic energy. Phys. Rev. Appl., 11, 014024(2019).
[40] G. Ptitcyn, M. S. Mirmoosa, S. A. Tretyakov. Time-modulated meta-atoms. Phys. Rev. Res., 1, 023014(2019).
[41] M. S. Mirmoosa, G. A. Ptitcyn, R. Fleury, S. A. Tretyakov. Instantaneous radiation from time-varying electric and magnetic dipoles. Phys. Rev. A, 102, 013503(2020).
[42] M. S. Mirmoosa, T. T. Koutserimpas, G. A. Ptitcyn, S. A. Tretyakov, R. Fleury. Dipole polarizability of time-varying particles(2020).
[43] A. Taflove, S. C. Hagness. Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method(2005).
[44] D. M. Sols, N. Engheta. Functional analysis of the polarization response in linear time-varying media: a generalization of the Kramers-Kronig relations. Phys. Rev. B, 103, 144303(2021).
[45] A. V. Oppenheim, A. S. Willsky, H. Nawab. Signals and Systems(1996).
[46] D. M. Pozar. Microwave Engineering(2011).
[47] G. Eleftheriades, A. Iyer, P. Kremer. Planar negative refractive index media using periodically L-C loaded transmission lines. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 50, 2702-2712(2002).
[48] N. Engheta, A. Salandrino, A. Alù. Circuit elements at optical frequencies: nanoinductors, nanocapacitors, and nanoresistors. Phys. Rev. Lett., 95, 095504(2005).
[49] M.-A. Parseval. Mémoire sur les séries et sur l’intégration complète d’une équation aux différences partielles linéaires du second ordre, à coefficients constants. Mém. prés. par divers savants, Acad. des Sciences, Paris, 1, 638-648(1806).
[50] M. Plancherel, M. Leffler. Contribution à l’étude de la représentation d’une fonction arbitraire par des intégrales définies. Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo (1884-1940), 30, 289-335(1910).
[51] L. Rayleigh. LIII. On the character of the complete radiation at a given temperature. London, Edinburgh, Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci., 27, 460-469(1889).
[52] H. Lebesgue. Intégrale, longueur, aire. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (1898-1922), 7, 231-359(1902).
Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address