• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 57, Issue 5, 051404 (2020)
Xiaotian Ji, Xingquan Zhang*, Lisheng Zuo, Tao Wang, Shanbao Pei, and Guotao Zhang
Author Affiliations
  • School of Mechanical Engineering, Anhui University of Technology, Maanshan, Anhui 243032, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP57.051404 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Xiaotian Ji, Xingquan Zhang, Lisheng Zuo, Tao Wang, Shanbao Pei, Guotao Zhang. Precise Set for Loading Region in Numerical Simulation of Laser Shocking Peening[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(5): 051404 Copy Citation Text show less
    Principle of load region set with embedded surface. (a) Establishment of model; (b) mesh partition; (c) embedment of load surface; (d) embedment of load
    Fig. 1. Principle of load region set with embedded surface. (a) Establishment of model; (b) mesh partition; (c) embedment of load surface; (d) embedment of load
    Distribution of nodes in three-dimensional solid element and surface element
    Fig. 2. Distribution of nodes in three-dimensional solid element and surface element
    Embedding elements of load surface and loading. (a) Model, cross-sections, and loads; (b) distribution of nodes and equivalence of load; (d) distribution of equivalent load on target
    Fig. 3. Embedding elements of load surface and loading. (a) Model, cross-sections, and loads; (b) distribution of nodes and equivalence of load; (d) distribution of equivalent load on target
    Comparison between two sets for load region. (a) The set based on fitting with element surfaces; (b) the set based on embedded surface
    Fig. 4. Comparison between two sets for load region. (a) The set based on fitting with element surfaces; (b) the set based on embedded surface
    Process of loading in multi-spot laser shocking. (a) Geometrical model of target and load surface; (b) mesh for target and load surface; (c) embedding the loading surface; (d) load on spot 1; (e) load on spot 2; (f) load on spot 9
    Fig. 5. Process of loading in multi-spot laser shocking. (a) Geometrical model of target and load surface; (b) mesh for target and load surface; (c) embedding the loading surface; (d) load on spot 1; (e) load on spot 2; (f) load on spot 9
    Load curve for simulation example
    Fig. 6. Load curve for simulation example
    Mises stress nephogram of the set based on embedded surface. (a) Accompanied with load surface; (b) removing load surface
    Fig. 7. Mises stress nephogram of the set based on embedded surface. (a) Accompanied with load surface; (b) removing load surface
    Results of displacements of the set based on embedded surface. (a) Accompanied with load surface; (b) removing load surface
    Fig. 8. Results of displacements of the set based on embedded surface. (a) Accompanied with load surface; (b) removing load surface
    Mises stress of the set of fitting with element surfaces
    Fig. 9. Mises stress of the set of fitting with element surfaces
    Displacement of the set of fitting with element surfaces
    Fig. 10. Displacement of the set of fitting with element surfaces
    Shocked sample. (a) Photograph of absorbed layer; (b) photograph of sample surface; (c) morphology of selected crater
    Fig. 11. Shocked sample. (a) Photograph of absorbed layer; (b) photograph of sample surface; (c) morphology of selected crater
    Morphology and its curve of crater. (a) Measuring location; (b) cross-section profile
    Fig. 12. Morphology and its curve of crater. (a) Measuring location; (b) cross-section profile
    Comparison of profiles between experiment and simulation. (a) Whole profile; (b) partial enlargement
    Fig. 13. Comparison of profiles between experiment and simulation. (a) Whole profile; (b) partial enlargement
    Xiaotian Ji, Xingquan Zhang, Lisheng Zuo, Tao Wang, Shanbao Pei, Guotao Zhang. Precise Set for Loading Region in Numerical Simulation of Laser Shocking Peening[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(5): 051404
    Download Citation