Minghong Yang, Yongxin Ye, Qilu Nie, Zhixiong Liu, Meng'en Cheng, Donglai Guo. Review on Research Progress of Optical Fiber Sensing Technology in Energy Storage Battery Performance Monitoring[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2023, 60(11): 1106006

Search by keywords or author
- Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
- Vol. 60, Issue 11, 1106006 (2023)
![Structure of FBG and the transmitted, reflected, and output spectra[45]](/richHtml/lop/2023/60/11/1106006/img_01.jpg)
Fig. 1. Structure of FBG and the transmitted, reflected, and output spectra[45]
![Schematic of internal and external FBG sensors and their photo[49]](/richHtml/lop/2023/60/11/1106006/img_02.jpg)
Fig. 2. Schematic of internal and external FBG sensors and their photo[49]
![TC and FBG sensors[50]. (a) Schematic of sensors on the battery surface; (b) schematic of the experimental device](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 3. TC and FBG sensors[50]. (a) Schematic of sensors on the battery surface; (b) schematic of the experimental device
![FBG, In-TC, and Ex-TC[51]. (a) Temperature response curve at 0.5C; (b) temperature variation curve measured at 0.5C, 1C, and 2C cycles](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 4. FBG, In-TC, and Ex-TC[51]. (a) Temperature response curve at 0.5C; (b) temperature variation curve measured at 0.5C, 1C, and 2C cycles
![Temperature sensing based on special optical fibers[55]. (a) Schematic; (b) fluorescence intensity of optical fiber conversion emission at different temperatures; (c) relationship between fluorescence intensity ratio and temperature](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 5. Temperature sensing based on special optical fibers[55]. (a) Schematic; (b) fluorescence intensity of optical fiber conversion emission at different temperatures; (c) relationship between fluorescence intensity ratio and temperature
![Distributed optical fiber sensor[60]. (a) Schematic of OTDR; (b) schematic of OFDR](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 6. Distributed optical fiber sensor[60]. (a) Schematic of OTDR; (b) schematic of OFDR
![Cylindrical battery with DFOS[63]. (a) Schematic; (b) discharge capacity of different batteries; (c) temperature changes under different charging and discharging rates](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 7. Cylindrical battery with DFOS[63]. (a) Schematic; (b) discharge capacity of different batteries; (c) temperature changes under different charging and discharging rates
![0.3C charge and discharge rate[63]. (a) Current and voltage; (b) delta temperature measured by D1, D2, and D3 at 2 cm from the negative terminal; (c) delta temperature measured by D1, D2, and D3 at 4 cm from the negative terminal; (d) delta temperature measured by D1, D2, and D3 at 6 cm from the negative terminal; (e) temperature distribution curve at D1, D2, and D3 when the battery is fully discharged](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 8. 0.3C charge and discharge rate[63]. (a) Current and voltage; (b) delta temperature measured by D1, D2, and D3 at 2 cm from the negative terminal; (c) delta temperature measured by D1, D2, and D3 at 4 cm from the negative terminal; (d) delta temperature measured by D1, D2, and D3 at 6 cm from the negative terminal; (e) temperature distribution curve at D1, D2, and D3 when the battery is fully discharged
![FBG sensor monitoring of strain in lithium ion soft pack battery[65]. (a) Schematic; (b) strain signal during standstill after different SOC](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 9. FBG sensor monitoring of strain in lithium ion soft pack battery[65]. (a) Schematic; (b) strain signal during standstill after different SOC
![Influence of the position of FBG sensors on battery strain measurement. (a) (c) Schematic and physical diagram of the FBG sensor pasted on the battery anode; (b) (d) schematic and schematic diagram of battery anode implanted with FBG sensor[66]](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 10. Influence of the position of FBG sensors on battery strain measurement. (a) (c) Schematic and physical diagram of the FBG sensor pasted on the battery anode; (b) (d) schematic and schematic diagram of battery anode implanted with FBG sensor[66]
![Spectra at 0% and 100% SOC for different FBG sensors[66]. (a) Attached;(b) implanted](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 11. Spectra at 0% and 100% SOC for different FBG sensors[66]. (a) Attached;(b) implanted
![FBG sensor monitoring AFLMBS[67]. (a) Constant current circulation curve; (b) strain signal; (c) derivative of strain vs time](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 12. FBG sensor monitoring AFLMBS[67]. (a) Constant current circulation curve; (b) strain signal; (c) derivative of strain vs time
![Structure of sensitivity enhanced optical FBG sensor[68]. (a) Assembly and exploded view; (b) sensitivity enhanced structure](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 13. Structure of sensitivity enhanced optical FBG sensor[68]. (a) Assembly and exploded view; (b) sensitivity enhanced structure
![Schematic of the hybrid sensor[74]](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 14. Schematic of the hybrid sensor[74]
![Fiber evanescent wave spectroscopy[80]. (a) Schematic of the experimental setup; (b) normalized transmittance of optical fiber at different wavelengths and different SOC](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 15. Fiber evanescent wave spectroscopy[80]. (a) Schematic of the experimental setup; (b) normalized transmittance of optical fiber at different wavelengths and different SOC
![Light transmittance and electric potential of the flexible battery when cycling between 0% and 100% SOC[81]](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 16. Light transmittance and electric potential of the flexible battery when cycling between 0% and 100% SOC[81]
![Sensor signals during charging and discharging in three configurations[82]](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 17. Sensor signals during charging and discharging in three configurations[82]
![Tilt Bragg grating[84]. (a) Configuration and sensing principle; (b) spectral response to charge density](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 18. Tilt Bragg grating[84]. (a) Configuration and sensing principle; (b) spectral response to charge density
![Schematic of optical fiber local surface plasmon resonance sensing probe[85]](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 19. Schematic of optical fiber local surface plasmon resonance sensing probe[85]
![Schematic of the multi-point optical fiber sensor[86]](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 20. Schematic of the multi-point optical fiber sensor[86]
![Schematic of refractive index sensor[87]。(a) Conventional design of fiber Bragg grating; (b) self-compensated FBG](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 21. Schematic of refractive index sensor[87]。(a) Conventional design of fiber Bragg grating; (b) self-compensated FBG
![Oxygen concentration measurement[56]. (a) Schematic; (b) intensity variation curve of reflected phosphorescence at a certain point on the cathode during the charging and discharging process](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 22. Oxygen concentration measurement[56]. (a) Schematic; (b) intensity variation curve of reflected phosphorescence at a certain point on the cathode during the charging and discharging process
|
Table 1. Traditional battery sensing approaches
|
Table 2. Optical fiber sensing approaches for batteries

Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address