• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 60, Issue 11, 1106006 (2023)
Minghong Yang*, Yongxin Ye, Qilu Nie, Zhixiong Liu..., Meng'en Cheng and Donglai Guo|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • National Engineering Research Center of Fiber Optic Sensing Technology and Networks,Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP230698 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Minghong Yang, Yongxin Ye, Qilu Nie, Zhixiong Liu, Meng'en Cheng, Donglai Guo. Review on Research Progress of Optical Fiber Sensing Technology in Energy Storage Battery Performance Monitoring[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2023, 60(11): 1106006 Copy Citation Text show less
    Structure of FBG and the transmitted, reflected, and output spectra[45]
    Fig. 1. Structure of FBG and the transmitted, reflected, and output spectra[45]
    Schematic of internal and external FBG sensors and their photo[49]
    Fig. 2. Schematic of internal and external FBG sensors and their photo[49]
    TC and FBG sensors[50]. (a) Schematic of sensors on the battery surface; (b) schematic of the experimental device
    Fig. 3. TC and FBG sensors[50]. (a) Schematic of sensors on the battery surface; (b) schematic of the experimental device
    FBG, In-TC, and Ex-TC[51]. (a) Temperature response curve at 0.5C; (b) temperature variation curve measured at 0.5C, 1C, and 2C cycles
    Fig. 4. FBG, In-TC, and Ex-TC51. (a) Temperature response curve at 0.5C; (b) temperature variation curve measured at 0.5C, 1C, and 2C cycles
    Temperature sensing based on special optical fibers[55]. (a) Schematic; (b) fluorescence intensity of optical fiber conversion emission at different temperatures; (c) relationship between fluorescence intensity ratio and temperature
    Fig. 5. Temperature sensing based on special optical fibers[55]. (a) Schematic; (b) fluorescence intensity of optical fiber conversion emission at different temperatures; (c) relationship between fluorescence intensity ratio and temperature
    Distributed optical fiber sensor[60]. (a) Schematic of OTDR; (b) schematic of OFDR
    Fig. 6. Distributed optical fiber sensor[60]. (a) Schematic of OTDR; (b) schematic of OFDR
    Cylindrical battery with DFOS[63]. (a) Schematic; (b) discharge capacity of different batteries; (c) temperature changes under different charging and discharging rates
    Fig. 7. Cylindrical battery with DFOS[63]. (a) Schematic; (b) discharge capacity of different batteries; (c) temperature changes under different charging and discharging rates
    0.3C charge and discharge rate[63]. (a) Current and voltage; (b) delta temperature measured by D1, D2, and D3 at 2 cm from the negative terminal; (c) delta temperature measured by D1, D2, and D3 at 4 cm from the negative terminal; (d) delta temperature measured by D1, D2, and D3 at 6 cm from the negative terminal; (e) temperature distribution curve at D1, D2, and D3 when the battery is fully discharged
    Fig. 8. 0.3C charge and discharge rate[63]. (a) Current and voltage; (b) delta temperature measured by D1, D2, and D3 at 2 cm from the negative terminal; (c) delta temperature measured by D1, D2, and D3 at 4 cm from the negative terminal; (d) delta temperature measured by D1, D2, and D3 at 6 cm from the negative terminal; (e) temperature distribution curve at D1, D2, and D3 when the battery is fully discharged
    FBG sensor monitoring of strain in lithium ion soft pack battery[65]. (a) Schematic; (b) strain signal during standstill after different SOC
    Fig. 9. FBG sensor monitoring of strain in lithium ion soft pack battery[65]. (a) Schematic; (b) strain signal during standstill after different SOC
    Influence of the position of FBG sensors on battery strain measurement. (a) (c) Schematic and physical diagram of the FBG sensor pasted on the battery anode; (b) (d) schematic and schematic diagram of battery anode implanted with FBG sensor[66]
    Fig. 10. Influence of the position of FBG sensors on battery strain measurement. (a) (c) Schematic and physical diagram of the FBG sensor pasted on the battery anode; (b) (d) schematic and schematic diagram of battery anode implanted with FBG sensor[66]
    Spectra at 0% and 100% SOC for different FBG sensors[66]. (a) Attached;(b) implanted
    Fig. 11. Spectra at 0% and 100% SOC for different FBG sensors[66]. (a) Attached;(b) implanted
    FBG sensor monitoring AFLMBS[67]. (a) Constant current circulation curve; (b) strain signal; (c) derivative of strain vs time
    Fig. 12. FBG sensor monitoring AFLMBS[67]. (a) Constant current circulation curve; (b) strain signal; (c) derivative of strain vs time
    Structure of sensitivity enhanced optical FBG sensor[68]. (a) Assembly and exploded view; (b) sensitivity enhanced structure
    Fig. 13. Structure of sensitivity enhanced optical FBG sensor[68]. (a) Assembly and exploded view; (b) sensitivity enhanced structure
    Schematic of the hybrid sensor[74]
    Fig. 14. Schematic of the hybrid sensor[74]
    Fiber evanescent wave spectroscopy[80]. (a) Schematic of the experimental setup; (b) normalized transmittance of optical fiber at different wavelengths and different SOC
    Fig. 15. Fiber evanescent wave spectroscopy[80]. (a) Schematic of the experimental setup; (b) normalized transmittance of optical fiber at different wavelengths and different SOC
    Light transmittance and electric potential of the flexible battery when cycling between 0% and 100% SOC[81]
    Fig. 16. Light transmittance and electric potential of the flexible battery when cycling between 0% and 100% SOC[81]
    Sensor signals during charging and discharging in three configurations[82]
    Fig. 17. Sensor signals during charging and discharging in three configurations[82]
    Tilt Bragg grating[84]. (a) Configuration and sensing principle; (b) spectral response to charge density
    Fig. 18. Tilt Bragg grating[84]. (a) Configuration and sensing principle; (b) spectral response to charge density
    Schematic of optical fiber local surface plasmon resonance sensing probe[85]
    Fig. 19. Schematic of optical fiber local surface plasmon resonance sensing probe[85]
    Schematic of the multi-point optical fiber sensor[86]
    Fig. 20. Schematic of the multi-point optical fiber sensor[86]
    Schematic of refractive index sensor[87]。(a) Conventional design of fiber Bragg grating; (b) self-compensated FBG
    Fig. 21. Schematic of refractive index sensor[87]。(a) Conventional design of fiber Bragg grating; (b) self-compensated FBG
    Oxygen concentration measurement[56]. (a) Schematic; (b) intensity variation curve of reflected phosphorescence at a certain point on the cathode during the charging and discharging process
    Fig. 22. Oxygen concentration measurement[56]. (a) Schematic; (b) intensity variation curve of reflected phosphorescence at a certain point on the cathode during the charging and discharging process
    ParameterMethodAccuracy /℃LocationRef.
    TemperatureLiquid-crystal thermography±0.1-0.5External3-4
    TemperatureInfrared thermal imaging±0.03-0.09External and internal5-8
    TemperatureThermocouple±1-2External and internal requires additional film preparation9-11
    TemperatureThermistor±0.01-0.05External and internal5-13
    TemperatureResistance temperature detector(RTD)±0.01-0.2External and internal13-16
    StrainStrain-gaugeExternal17-19
    StrainLoad cellExternal20
    StrainDigital imageExternal21-23
    Strain

    X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

    (XPS)

    External24-25
    StrainX-ray diffractionExternal26-27
    SOC/SOH

    Electrochemical

    Impedance

    Spectroscope

    External28-30
    SOC/SOHData-driven methodsExternal31-32
    SOC/SOH

    Equivalent circuit

    model(ECM)

    External33-34
    SOC/SOHDirect measurement(EM,SEM,TEM,XPS,etc)External35-38
    GasResistanceExternal39
    GasInfrared absorptionInternal40
    Table 1. Traditional battery sensing approaches
    ParameterMethodSensitivityAccuracyLocationRef
    TemperatureFBG8-10 pm·℃-1±0.1 °CExternal and internal48-51
    TemperatureOptical fiber photoluminescent1.62%·K-1±0.5 °CExternal and internal55
    TemperatureDFOS1.328 GHz·℃-1±0.27 ℃External and internal61-63
    StrainFBG0.854 pm·με-1±0.1 μεExternal and internal65-67
    StrainFBG/FPI±0.1 μεExternal and internal74
    SOC/SOHFOEWInternal80-83
    SOC/SOHSPR/LSPR3.2×10-3%·mC-1R2=98.5%Internal84-85
    Electrolyte densityMulti-point fiberInternal86
    Electrolyte refractive indexFBGInternal87
    GasOptical fiber photoluminescent0.12%Internal56
    GasColorimetricInternal89
    Table 2. Optical fiber sensing approaches for batteries
    Minghong Yang, Yongxin Ye, Qilu Nie, Zhixiong Liu, Meng'en Cheng, Donglai Guo. Review on Research Progress of Optical Fiber Sensing Technology in Energy Storage Battery Performance Monitoring[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2023, 60(11): 1106006
    Download Citation