Author Affiliations
1Key Laboratory of Fiber Optic Sensing and Communication, Ministry of Education, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, Sichuan , China2Fiber Optic Sensing Research Center, Zhijiang Laboratory, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang , Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Foundation of the next-generation fiber optic Internet of Things—fiber-optic distributed acoustic sensor based on optical communication cable sensing
Fig. 2. Typical DAS system structure and vibration/sound sensing mechanism
Fig. 3. Smart fiber-optic DAS and its signal processing architecture in smart city monitoring applications
Fig. 4. One-dimensional convolution neural network based supervised recognition model
[58] Fig. 5. MS-1D CNN based supervised recognition model
[65] Fig. 6. Recognition model combining multi-scale depth features with temporal relationships
[67] Fig. 7. Temporal sequential relationship among multi-scale deep features based on HMM
[67] Fig. 8. 2D-CNN recognition model with time-frequency input of MFCC
[69] Fig. 9. 2D spectrograms of different types of signals via STFT
[59]. (a) Digging; (b) walking; (c) vehicle-passing; (d) damaging
Fig. 10. 2D images of different types of signals via GAF transform
[71]. (a) Window partition signal; (b) schematic diagram of Gramian angular difference field (GADF) coding; (c) schematic diagram of Gramian angular summation field (GASF) coding
Fig. 11. Supervised recognition model based on attention mechanism and ResNet-CBAM
[72] Fig. 12. Time-space waterfall figures of vibration signals due to various third-party interference
[73]. (a) Excavator; (b) electrical hammer; (c) shovel; (d) hammer; (e) pickaxe; (f) metro
Fig. 13. Recognition result fusion correction based on time-space label matrix
[73] Fig. 14. Supervised recognition model combining convolutional neural network and bi-directional long short term memory
[75] Fig. 15. Supervised recognition model based on dual path network
[80]. (a) Dual path architecture; (b) equivalent block of RP; (c) equivalent block of DCP
Fig. 16. Supervised recognition model based on attention-based long short-term memory network
[81] Fig. 17. DAS recognition model based on fusion of manual features and deep features
[83] Fig. 18. SNN-based DAS unsupervised learning network
[87] Fig. 19. DAS transfer learning network based on AlexNet+SVM
[89] Fig. 20. ROC curves for different models
[72] Fig. 21. Multi-source aliasing phenomenon in complex urban environment
[93] Fig. 22. DAS multi-source separation method based on Fast ICA
[93] Fig. 23. Multi- radial-distance event classification method based on deep learning
[100] Item | Positive (true label,abnormal) | Negative(true label, normal) |
---|
Positive (predicted label) | TP | FP | Negative (predicted label) | FN | TN |
|
Table 1. Confusion matrix of binary classification
Institution | Information extraction | Model/ method | A /% | P /% | R /% | F1 | FAR / % | MAR / % | IDT | Application scenario | Ref. No |
---|
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China | Time | 1-D CNN | 98.19 | 97.95 | 97.16 | 0.9753 | — | — | 27.0 ms | Pipeline | [58] | Huazhong University of Science and Technology | Time | 1-D CNN + DenseNet | 98.40 | — | — | — | — | — | 2.00 ms | Cable | [62] | Beijing Jiaotong University | Time | DBN-GRU | 96.72 | — | — | — | — | 1.83 | 79.0 ms | Cable | [63] | Jinan University | Time | DRSN-NTF | 92.82 | — | — | 0.9167 | — | — | — | Perimeter security | [64] | Anhui University | Time (multi-scale) | MS 1-D CNN | 96.59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | Perimeter security | [65] | Tianjin University | Time (multi-sacle) | MSCNN+CPL | 84.67 | — | — | — | — | — | 17.0 ms | Perimeter security | [66] | University of Electronic Science and Technology of China | Time(multi-scale,long-short-term) | mCNN + HMM | 98.10 | 98.08 | 98.08 | 0.9805 | — | — | 67.0 ms | Cable | [67] | Tianjin University | Time(multi-scale,long-short-time) | LSTM+CNN | 94.60 | — | — | — | — | — | — | Perimeter security | [68] | University of Shanghai for Science and Technology | Time | SSGAN | 88.94 | — | — | — | — | — | — | Perimeter security | [84] | Beijing Jiaotong University | Time | Semi- supervised FixMatch | 97.91 | 97.93 | 97.96 | — | — | 2.04 | - | Railway | [86] | UGES of Türkiye | T-F | 2D CNN | 93.00 | 98.10 | — | — | — | — | — | Cable | [70] | Beijing Institute of Technology | T-F | 2D CNN | 97.18 | 98.02 | 97.99 | 0.9798 | — | — | — | Cable | [69] | Hubei University of Technology | T-F | 2D CNN | 97.22 | 93.66 | 91.90 | 0.9267 | — | 8.10 | — | Perimeter security | [71] | Zhejiang University | T-F | 2D CNN + SVM | 93.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | Cable | [59] | University of Electronic Science and Technology of China | T-F | ResNet+ CBAM | 98.89 | 98.58 | 98.68 | 0.9863 | — | — | 3.30 ms | Cable | [72] | University of Cologne | T-F | ALSTM | 94.30 | — | — | — | — | — | 0.910 s | Cable | [81] | University of Electronic Science and Technology of China | T-F | Unsupervised SNN | 96.52 | — | — | — | — | — | 0.364 s | Cable | [87] | Russian Academy of Sciencesul | T-S | 2D CNN | 91.20 | 92.06 | — | 0.9138 | — | — | — | Perimeter security | [60] | University of Applied Sciences,Austria | T-S | 2D CNN | 99.91 | — | — | — | — | — | 34.3 μs | Pipeline | [61] | Tongji University | T-S | 2D CNN | 98.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | Pipeline | [73] | Tianjin University | T-S | 2D CNN+YOLO | — | 70.40 | 82.90 | — | — | 17.1 | — | Pipeline | [74] | University of Electronic Science and Technology of China | T-S | 1D CNNs- BiLSTM | 97.00 | 97.06 | 96.90 | 0.9706 | — | 3.10 | 49.0 ms | Cable | [75] | North China Electric Power University | T-S | MATCN | 98.50 | — | — | — | — | — | 0.530 s | Perimeter security | [79] | Sichuan University | T-S | 2D CNN + LSTM | 85.60 | — | — | 0.8870 | 8 | — | 1.24 s | Railway | [82] | Qilu University of Technology | T-S | 100G-Net | 99.60 | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0 ms | Perimeter security | [76] | Southern University of Science and Technology | T-S | Faster RCNN | 96.32 | — | — | — | — | — | 0.160 s | Cable | [77] | T-S | YOLO | 96.14 | — | — | — | — | — | 43.8 ms | Perimeter security | [78] | Shantou University | T-S | Transfer learning | 96.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | Cable | [88] | 94.67 | — | — | — | — | — | 3.05 ms | Cable | [89] | Tsinghua University | T-S | SSAE | 97.90 | — | 97.38 | — | — | 2.62 | 1.73 ms | Pipeline | [85] | Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics,Chinese Academy of Sciences | S-F | DPN | 99.28 | 99.28 | 99.28 | 0.9700 | — | 0.72 | — | Railway | [80] |
|
Table 2. Comparison of key DAS signal recognition algorithms and their performance