• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 59, Issue 2, 0215003 (2022)
Wensong Song, Zonghua Zhang*, Nan Gao, and Zhaozong Meng
Author Affiliations
  • School of Mechanical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300130, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202259.0215003 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Wensong Song, Zonghua Zhang, Nan Gao, Zhaozong Meng. Spatial Pose Calibration Method for Lidar and Camera Based on Intensity Information[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(2): 0215003 Copy Citation Text show less
    Three-dimensional scanning system of the lidar. (a) Coordinate system of the lidar; (b) on-axis coordinate system
    Fig. 1. Three-dimensional scanning system of the lidar. (a) Coordinate system of the lidar; (b) on-axis coordinate system
    Distance from the origin of the left and right coordinate systems to the plane
    Fig. 2. Distance from the origin of the left and right coordinate systems to the plane
    Principle of the camera-lidar system
    Fig. 3. Principle of the camera-lidar system
    Filtering result of the point cloud. (a) Cross-sectional view of the point cloud; (b) processing result of the radius filtering algorithm
    Fig. 4. Filtering result of the point cloud. (a) Cross-sectional view of the point cloud; (b) processing result of the radius filtering algorithm
    Coordinate system of the virtual camera
    Fig. 5. Coordinate system of the virtual camera
    Physical image of the camera-lidar system. (a) Front view; (b) back view
    Fig. 6. Physical image of the camera-lidar system. (a) Front view; (b) back view
    Effect of parameter verification. (a) Before calibration; (b) after calibration; (c) room model
    Fig. 7. Effect of parameter verification. (a) Before calibration; (b) after calibration; (c) room model
    Environment of the joint calibration experiment
    Fig. 8. Environment of the joint calibration experiment
    Grayscale images of different pixel sizes (a) Pixel size is too large; (b) pixel size is too small; (c) pixel size is moderate
    Fig. 9. Grayscale images of different pixel sizes (a) Pixel size is too large; (b) pixel size is too small; (c) pixel size is moderate
    SIFT feature point matching graph
    Fig. 10. SIFT feature point matching graph
    Variation curve of the reprodjection error
    Fig. 11. Variation curve of the reprodjection error
    Result of data fusion. (a) Fusion environment; (b) fusion effect
    Fig. 12. Result of data fusion. (a) Fusion environment; (b) fusion effect
    Parameterfx fyCxCy
    Calibration result1055.51791052.952649.637485.239
    Table 1. Camera parameters after calibration
    Calibration parameterθ /(°)β /(°)x /my /m
    Calibration result1.41-0.150. 0010.002
    Table 2. Self-calibration results of lidar
    LengthWidthHeight
    Measured valueErrorMeasured valueErrorMeasured valueError
    646.91.6622.71.3259.71.5
    Table 3. Comparison of room size
    Rotation matrixTranslation matrix
    R=     0.9993-0.0003-0.0367-0.0367-0.0070-0.9993     0.0001     1.0000-0.0070T=-0.008271,0.096104,-0.00883505
    Table 4. Calibration result
    MethodNumber of checkers

    Reprojection

    error /pixel

    Ours02.29
    Ref.[1663.51
    Table 5. Reprojection errors of different methods
    Wensong Song, Zonghua Zhang, Nan Gao, Zhaozong Meng. Spatial Pose Calibration Method for Lidar and Camera Based on Intensity Information[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(2): 0215003
    Download Citation