• Infrared and Laser Engineering
  • Vol. 52, Issue 6, 20230148 (2023)
Ding Li1,2, Xudong Yu1,2,*, Guo Wei1,2, and Hui Luo1,2
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China
  • 2Nanhu Laser Laboratory, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/IRLA20230148 Cite this Article
    Ding Li, Xudong Yu, Guo Wei, Hui Luo. Optimal calibration method for nonorthogonal errors in dual-axis rotational RLG INS[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2023, 52(6): 20230148 Copy Citation Text show less
    Nonorthogonal angles between IMU frame and inner rotating frame
    Fig. 1. Nonorthogonal angles between IMU frame and inner rotating frame
    Nonorthogonal angles between inner rotating frame and outer rotating frame
    Fig. 2. Nonorthogonal angles between inner rotating frame and outer rotating frame
    The flow diagram of PSO algorithm
    Fig. 3. The flow diagram of PSO algorithm
    Dual-axis rotational laser INS
    Fig. 4. Dual-axis rotational laser INS
    Fitness value convergence process of PSO algorithm
    Fig. 5. Fitness value convergence process of PSO algorithm
    Vehicle pitch error
    Fig. 6. Vehicle pitch error
    Vehicle roll error
    Fig. 7. Vehicle roll error
    Vehicle yaw error
    Fig. 8. Vehicle yaw error
    Vehicle attitude
    Fig. 9. Vehicle attitude
    Attitude RMSE of 50 Monte Carlo test
    Fig. 10. Attitude RMSE of 50 Monte Carlo test
    CharacteristicsParameters
    Gyro drift stability/(°)·h−1${ { {0.005} } }$
    Gyro stochastic error/(°)·h−1/2${ { { 0.000\;5} } }$
    Gyro scale factor stability/ppm$2$
    Accelerometer bias stability/μg$20$
    Sampling frequency/Hz$200$
    Table 1. IMU characteristics
    PSO parametersSetting value
    $\omega $0.8
    ${c_1},{c_2}$2, 2
    $ {V_{\min }},{V_{\max }} $−1, 1
    N20
    G150
    Table 2. PSO parameters
    AnglesValue/(°)AnglesValue/(°)
    $ {\theta _x} $−0.000 279$ {\eta _x} $0.000721
    $ {\theta _y} $−0.000 963$ {\eta _y} $−0.000 806
    $ {\theta _\textit{z}} $−0.002 212$ {\eta _\textit{z}} $−0.009 205
    Table 3. The calibration result of nonorthogonal angles
    MethodsRMSE/(°)
    PitchRollYaw
    Uncompensated0.202 50.077 90.926 3
    Previous method0.025 20.020 00.012 9
    Proposed method0.002 70.005 40.002 4
    Table 4. Vehicle attitude RMSE comparison
    Ding Li, Xudong Yu, Guo Wei, Hui Luo. Optimal calibration method for nonorthogonal errors in dual-axis rotational RLG INS[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2023, 52(6): 20230148
    Download Citation