• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 59, Issue 19, 1912003 (2022)
Kai Huang1、3, Shangbiao Sun2, Yongzhang Yang1, Rufeng Tang1, Zhulian Li1, and Yuqiang Li1、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Yunnan Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650216, Yunnan, China
  • 2State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, China
  • 3School of Astronomy and Space Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202259.1912003 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Kai Huang, Shangbiao Sun, Yongzhang Yang, Rufeng Tang, Zhulian Li, Yuqiang Li. Research and Application of Lunar Laser Ranging Observation Model[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(19): 1912003 Copy Citation Text show less
    Basic principle of the LLR
    Fig. 1. Basic principle of the LLR
    Time difference calculated by SOFA and INPOP19a methods
    Fig. 2. Time difference calculated by SOFA and INPOP19a methods
    Variation of the position of the corner reflector caused by lunar solid tide
    Fig. 3. Variation of the position of the corner reflector caused by lunar solid tide
    Two-way residuals of LLR data
    Fig. 4. Two-way residuals of LLR data
    Two-way residuals of LLR data from Yunnan Observatory
    Fig. 5. Two-way residuals of LLR data from Yunnan Observatory
    Standard point data processing results under different inputs. (a) INPOP19a; (b) EPM2017; (c) DE430; (d) standard point data difference between INPOP19a and EPM2017; (e) standard point data difference between INPOP19a and DE430; (f) standard point data difference between DE430 and EPM2017
    Fig. 6. Standard point data processing results under different inputs. (a) INPOP19a; (b) EPM2017; (c) DE430; (d) standard point data difference between INPOP19a and EPM2017; (e) standard point data difference between INPOP19a and DE430; (f) standard point data difference between DE430 and EPM2017
    Difference between the predicted position at launch time and the CPF file
    Fig. 7. Difference between the predicted position at launch time and the CPF file
    Difference between the forecast position at the time of reception and the CPF file
    Fig. 8. Difference between the forecast position at the time of reception and the CPF file
    ComponentReference
    Lunar orbit around the earthINPOP19a
    Lunar librationINPOP19a
    Earth rotation and orientationIERS Conv.(2010)
    Relativistic propagation delayIERS Conv.(2010)
    Lorentz transform between TDB and TTIERS Conv.(2010)
    Solid earth tidesIERS Conv.(2010)
    Solid moon tidesLove number estimated with INPOP19a
    Atmospheric delayIERS Conv.(2010)
    Table 1. Reference systems used by the generative model
    Earth stationX /mY /mZ /mX˙ /(mm·a-1Y˙/(mm·a-1Z˙ /(mm·a-1
    Apollo-1463998.9085-5166632.76353435012.8835-0.01410.0003-0.0022
    Grasse4581692.1675556196.07304389355.1088-0.01510.01910.0118
    Haleakala-5466003.7191-2404425.93692242197.9030-0.01220.06220.0310
    Matera4641978.81001393067.53104133249.4800-0.01800.01920.0140
    McDonald-1330781.5567-5328756.37833235697.9118-0.02770.02770.0139
    MLRS 1-1330120.9826-5328532.36443236146.0080-0.01240.0009-0.0053
    MLRS 2-1330021.4931-5328403.34013236481.6472-0.01290.0015-0.0036
    Wettzell4075576.7587931785.50774801583.6067-0.01390.01700.0124
    Table 2. Three-dimensional coordinates and average moving speed of ground station under ITRF
    Lunar reflectorX /mY /mZ /m
    Apollo 111591966.6111690699.545221003.7497
    Lunokhod 11114292.2641-781298.38441076058.6360
    Apollo 141652689.5835-520997.5017-109730.5271
    Apollo 151554678.304798095.6097765005.2064
    Lunokhod 21339363.3642801872.0049756358.6487
    Table 3. Three-dimensional coordinates of reflector under PA
    Kai Huang, Shangbiao Sun, Yongzhang Yang, Rufeng Tang, Zhulian Li, Yuqiang Li. Research and Application of Lunar Laser Ranging Observation Model[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(19): 1912003
    Download Citation