Author Affiliations
1College of Physical Science and Technology, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, Guangxi 541004, China2College of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518061, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Schematic of SPR sensor enhanced by two-dimensional Ti3C2Tx MXene nanosheet
Fig. 2. For the BAK1 prism/35 nm silver film/Ti3C2Tx MXene/monolayer graphene hybrid configuration, the calculated sensing performance by changing the number of Ti3C2Tx MXene layers when the excitation wavelength is 632.8 nm and the sensing medium is deionized water with the refractive index of 1.333. (a) Reflectivity; (b) phase
Fig. 3. SPR phase and reflectivity curves generated by the coupling BAK1 prism/35 nm silver film/3-layer Ti3C2Tx MXene/monolayer graphene when the excitation wavelength is 632.8 nm, and the sensing medium is deionized water with the refractive index of 1.333
Fig. 4. For the coupling BAK1 prism/silver film/Ti3C2Tx MXene/monolayer graphene SPR configuration, sensing performance changed with thicknesses of silver film and number of Ti3C2Tx MXene layers at Δnbio=0.0012 RIU when the excitation wavelength is 632.8 nm. (a) Phase difference; (b) angle deflection
Fig. 5. Curves of phase difference changed with refractive index of medium by varying different thicknesses of silver film in the coupling BAK1 prism/silver film/Ti3C2Tx MXene/monolayer graphene SPR configuration when the excitation wavelength is 632.8 nm. (a) 30 nm; (b) 35 nm; (c) 40 nm; (d) 45 nm; (e) 50 nm; (f) 55 nm
Fig. 6. Simulated results at the sensing interface between Ti3C2Tx MXene and graphene. (a) Distribution of electric field intensity; (b) evanescent decay curve of electric field
Fig. 7. Comparison of the SPR sensing performances for different structures when the excitation wavelength is 632.8 nm
λ /nm | Refractive index |
---|
Au | Ag | SF11 | BAF10 | BAK1 | BK7 |
---|
532 | 0.5438+2.2309i | 0.0540+3.4290i | 1.7948 | 1.6747 | 1.5758 | 1.5195 | 632.8 | 1.7231+4.7557i | 0.0563+4.2760i | 1.7786 | 1.6671 | 1.5704 | 1.5151 | 785 | 0.1489+4.7830i | 0.0345+5.4581i | 1.7655 | 1.6605 | 1.5657 | 1.5111 | 980 | 0.2178+6.3201i | 0.0400+6.9264i | 1.7566 | 1.6555 | 1.5620 | 1.5078 | 1550 | 0.0344+5.4581i | 0.1445+11.3660i | 1.7434 | 1.6469 | 1.5552 | 1.5007 |
|
Table 1. Refractive indexes of SF11, BAF10, BAK1, BK7, gold film, and silver film
λ /nm | Metal | Prism | dmetal /nm | Numberof MXenelayers | θSPR /(°) | ΔθSPR /(°)(Δnbio=0.001) | Δφd /(°) | Sp /[(°)/RIU] | FWTM /(°) | Rmin |
---|
| | Δnbio=10-6 | Δnbio=0.0012 |
---|
1550 | Au | BK7 | 30 | 2 | 64.00 | 0.268 | 0.0001 | 106.16 | 8.85×104 | 0.0974 | 4.51×10-7 | 980 | Au | SF11 | 33 | 4 | 52.01 | 0.061 | 0.4433 | 80.68 | 7.17×104 | 0.4115 | 4.08×10-5 | 785 | Au | SF11 | 33 | 5 | 53.89 | 0.024 | 0.5096 | 88.01 | 7.33×104 | 0.2909 | 4.74×10-5 | 632.8 | Au | BAK1 | 40 | 2 | 37.00 | 0.027 | 1.8054 | 3.92 | 3.27×103 | 0.4380 | 4.77×10-7 | 532 | Au | SF11 | 30 | 5 | 59.46 | 0.005 | 2.6198 | 108.35 | 9.03×104 | 0.0820 | 2.65×10-7 | 1550 | Ag | BAF10 | 36 | 2 | 54.80 | 0.636 | 0.1050 | 12.64 | 1.05×104 | 0.0990 | 5.22×10-5 | 980 | Ag | BAK1 | 31 | 5 | 61.60 | 0.088 | 2.6555 | 99.22 | 8.27×104 | 0.0984 | 1.73×10-6 | 785 | Ag | BAF10 | 30 | 5 | 57.84 | 0.042 | 0.9038 | 89.21 | 7.43×104 | 0.0979 | 3.95×10-6 | 632.8 | Ag | BAK1 | 35 | 3 | 65.27 | 0.121 | 35.0396 | 110.55 | 9.21×104 | 0.0969 | 3.48×10-9 | 532 | Ag | BAK1 | 50 | 0 | 66.84 | 0.120 | 2.1918 | 100.29 | 8.36×104 | 0.0966 | 6.81×10-6 |
|
Table 2. Results of optimized SPR sensing performance