[1] Political theory in forest policy science[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 16, 1-6(2012).
[2] et alThe World Bank improving environmental and natural resource policies: Power, deregulation, and privatization in (Post-Soviet) Armenia[J]. World Development, 92, 215-224(2017).
[3] et alActor-centred power: The driving force in decentralized community-based forest governance[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 49, 34-42(2014).
[4] et alEnhancing the application of Krott et al. ’s (2014) Actor-Centred Power (ACP): The importance of understanding the effect of changes in polity for the measurement of power dynamics over time[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 62, 184-186(2016).
[5] Research trend: Forest policy and governance: Future analyses in multiple social science disciplines[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 91, 1-4(2018).
[6] International and domestic sustainable forest management policies: Distributive effects on power among state agencies in Bangladesh[J]. Sustainability, 8, 335-362(2016).
[7] et alOpposing interests in the legalization of non-procedural forest conversion to oil palm in central Kalimantan, Indonesia[J]. Land Use Policy, 58, 472-481(2016).
[8] Development narratives, notions of forest crisis, and boom of oil palm plantations in Indonesia[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 73, 130-139(2016).
[9] Decentralization and democratic forest reforms in India: Moving to a rights-based approach[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 51, 1-8(2015).
[10] Foreign donors driving policy change in recipient countries: Three decades of development aid towards community-based forest policy in Bangladesh[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 68, 39-53(2016).
[11] et alComparing community forestry actors in Cameroon, Indonesia, Namibia, Nepal and Germany[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 68, 81-87(2016).
[12] Paradoxes of participation: The logic of professionalization in participatory forestry[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 60, 1-6(2015).
[13] Governing the design of national REDD+: An analysis of the power of agency[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 49, 23-33(2014).
[14] How does science-based policy advice matter in policy making? The RIU model as a framework for analyzing and explaining processes of scientific knowledge transfer[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 68, 65-72(2016).
[15] Rethinking ‘expert’knowledge in community forest management in Tanzania[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 60, 7-18(2015).
[16] 从管制走向治理: 森林治理的兴起[J]. 林业经济, 19-24(2016).
[17] 迷茫中林业经济管理学科: 发展旅程的断裂和知识结构的困惑[J]. 林业经济问题, 36, 89-96(2016).
[18] What do these terms mean? Forest forestry forester[J]. Journal of Forestry, 100, 15-19(2002).
[19] 林业政策研究的发展及理论框架综述[J]. 资源科学, 40, 1106-1118(2018).
[20] Social Forestry: Changing Perspectives in Forestry Science or Practice?[D]. Wageningen: Wageningen Agricultural University(1999).
[21] Earth Summit: Rio Declaration and Forest Principles: Final Text[M]. New York: United Nations(1992).
[22] Changing governance of the world’s forests[J]. Science, 320, 1460-1462(2008).
[23] Values, beliefs and management of public forests in the western world at the close of the twentieth century[J]. Unasylva, 49, 16-26(1998).
[24] Forest Policy Analysis[M]. The Netherlands: Dordrecht(2005).
[25] Governance as a bridge between disciplines: Cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy[J]. European Journal of Political Research, 43, 143-171(2004).
[26] Policy and power: A conceptual framework between the ‘old’ and ‘new’ policy idioms[J]. Policy Sciences, 37, 339-356(2004).
[27] Assessing forest governance from a ‘triple G’ perspective: Government, governance, governmentality[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 49, 17-22(2014).
[28] Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010[M]. Rome: FAO(2010).
[29] Twenty-four years of community forestry in Nepal[J]. International Forestry Review, 4, 149-155(2002).
[30] et alFive years of REDD+ governance: The use of market mechanisms as a response to anthropogenic climate change[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 79, 8-16(2017).
[31] Defining and assessing forest governance[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 49, 1-3(2014).
[32] Environmental governance[J]. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31, 297-325(2006).
[33] Who determines biodiversity? An analysis of actors’ power and interests in community forestry in Namibia[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 36, 42-51(2013).
[34] et alBack to basics: Considerations in evaluating the outcomes of community forestry[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 14, 1-5(2012).
[35] Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation[J]. World Development, 27, 629-649(1999).
[36] Power distribution, the external environment and common property forest governance: A local user groups model[J]. Ecological Economics, 59, 341-352(2006).
[37] The concept of power[J]. Behavioral Sciences, 2, 201-215(1957).
[38] Network analysis and actor-centred approach: A critical review[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 68, 30-38(2016).
[39] Shifting power relations in sustainability transitions: A multi-actor perspective[J]. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18, 628-649(2016).
[40] [M]. Weber Collection: Basic Concepts of Sociology(2005).
[41] et alBiogeographical patterns and determinants of invasion by forest pathogens in Europe[J]. The New Phytologist, 197, 238-250(2013).
[42] et alResilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems[J]. Ecology and Society, 9, 5-13(2004).
[43] Linkages: An individual-based forest ecosystem model[J]. Climatic Change, 34, 253-261(1996).
[44] Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research[M]. London: Routledge(2018).
[45] 转换与支配: 吉登斯权力思想的诠释[J]. 学海, 48-54(2004).
[46] [M]. 社会的构成: 结构化理论大纲(1998).
[47] 结构化的行动、行动化的结构: 读吉登斯《社会的构成: 结构化理论大纲》[J]. 社会, 46-47(1998).
[49] A theoretical framework for explaining the choice of instruments in environmental policy[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 16, 14-22(2012).
[50] [M]. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process(1995).
[51] 当代西方社会理论的实践论转向: 吉登斯结构化理论的深度审视[J]. 哲学动态, 7-13(2004).
[52] Power over, power with, and power to relations: Critical reflections on public relations, the dominant coalition, and activism[J]. Journal of Public Relations Research, 17, 5-28(2005).
[53] ‘Power To’ and ‘Power Over’[M]. London: Sage Publications(2009).
[54] Conversion of forests into oil palm plantations in west Kalimantan, Indonesia: Insights from actors’ power and its dynamics[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 78, 32-39(2017).
[55] Reply to comments[J]. Political Studies Review, 164-173(2006).
[56] 在全球化环境下重新定义和测量权力[J]. 社会科学, 3-12(2014).
[57] Lukes reloaded: An actor-centred three-dimensional power framework[J]. Politics, 36, 118-130(2015).
[58] A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems[J]. Science, 325, 419-422(2009).
[59] et alThe emerging power of peasant farmers in the tenurial conflicts over the uses of state forestland in central Java, Indonesia[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 67, 70-75(2016).
[60] Power: A Radical View[M]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan(2005).
[61] [M]. A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations: On Power, Involvement, and Their Correlates(1975).
[62] Carrots, Sticks, and Sermons: Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation[M]. New Brunswick: Transaction(1998).
[63] Power Factor Typology through Organizational and Network Analysis: Using Environmental Policy Networks As An Illustration[D]. Göttingen:Georg-August-Universität Göttingen(2004).
[64] 微观经济学的新理解框架: 激励机制、经济体制与资源最优配置[J]. 江海学刊, 72-80(2014).
[65] The Problem of Social Cost[A]. Gopalakrishnan C. Classic Papers in Natural Resource Economics Revisited[M]. London: Routledge(2018).
[66] Managing information in forest policy networks: Distinguishing the influential actors from the ‘postmen’[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 68, 73-80(2016).
[67] Research trend: Power analyses in polycentric and multi-level forest governance[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 81, 65-68(2017).
[68] Value and risks of the use of analytical theory in science for forest policy[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 16, 35-42(2012).
[69] Rural governance, forestry, and the promotion of local knowledge: The case of the German rural development program ‘active regions’[J]. Small-Scale Forestry, 8, 211-230(2009).
[70] 福柯话语理论批判[J]. 文艺理论研究, 33, 121-129(2013).
[71] Power, the hidden factor in development cooperation: An example of community forestry in Cameroon[J]. Open Journal of Forestry, 2, 240-251(2012).
[72] et alPowerful stakeholders as drivers of community forestry: Results of an international study[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 58, 92-101(2015).
[73] REDD+ policy networks: Exploring actors and power structures in an emerging policy domain[J]. Ecology and Society, 19, 29-38(2014).
[74] et alDoes actor power impede outcomes in participatory agroforestry approach? Evidence from Sal forests area, Bangladesh[J]. Agroforestry Systems, 89, 885-899(2015).
[75] [M]. Understanding Institutional Diversity(2005).
