• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 59, Issue 5, 0514003 (2022)
Gongming Guo1、2 and Yanqiang Guo1、2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Advanced Transducers and Intelligent Control System, Ministry of Education, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan , Shanxi 030024, China
  • 2College of Physics and Optoelectronics, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan , Shanxi 030024, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202259.0514003 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Gongming Guo, Yanqiang Guo. Two-Mode Chaos Generation in Quantum Dot Micropillar Lasers Subject to Optical Feedback[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(5): 0514003 Copy Citation Text show less
    Model diagram of two-mode chaotic light field based on quantum dot micropillar laser with optical feedback. (a) Schematic of experimental setup; (b) schematic of theoretical mode
    Fig. 1. Model diagram of two-mode chaotic light field based on quantum dot micropillar laser with optical feedback. (a) Schematic of experimental setup; (b) schematic of theoretical mode
    When the feedback strengths of strong mode and weak mode are 15 ns-1 and 10 ns-1, theoretical chaotic output intensity of quantum dot micropillar laser as a function of pump current
    Fig. 2. When the feedback strengths of strong mode and weak mode are 15 ns-1 and 10 ns-1, theoretical chaotic output intensity of quantum dot micropillar laser as a function of pump current
    When feedback intensities of strong mode and weak mode are 15 ns-1 and 10 ns-1, mode-switching results between strong mode and weak mode at three pump currents. (a) 7 μA; (b) 10 μA; (c) 13 μA
    Fig. 3. When feedback intensities of strong mode and weak mode are 15 ns-1 and 10 ns-1, mode-switching results between strong mode and weak mode at three pump currents. (a) 7 μA; (b) 10 μA; (c) 13 μA
    Power bifurcation of strong mode and weak mode varing with feedback intensity at different pump currents. (a) Strong mode of 9-19 ns-1; (b) weak mode of 5-15 ns-1
    Fig. 4. Power bifurcation of strong mode and weak mode varing with feedback intensity at different pump currents. (a) Strong mode of 9-19 ns-1; (b) weak mode of 5-15 ns-1
    Power spectra and phase attractors of two modes when pump current is J=13 μA, feedback intensities of strong mode and weak mode are κs=15 ns-1 and κw=10 ns-1, respectively. (a) (b) Power spectra of strong-mode and weak-mode chaotic output; (c) (d) phase attractors of strong-mode and weak-mode chaotic output
    Fig. 5. Power spectra and phase attractors of two modes when pump current is J=13 μA, feedback intensities of strong mode and weak mode are κs=15 ns-1 and κw=10 ns-1, respectively. (a) (b) Power spectra of strong-mode and weak-mode chaotic output; (c) (d) phase attractors of strong-mode and weak-mode chaotic output
    Variation of effective bandwidth of strong mode and weak mode output chaotic light field with feedback intensity at different pump currents. (a) Strong mode; (b) weak mode
    Fig. 6. Variation of effective bandwidth of strong mode and weak mode output chaotic light field with feedback intensity at different pump currents. (a) Strong mode; (b) weak mode
    Related results when pump current is J=13 μA, feedback intensities of strong mode and weak mode are κs=15 ns-1 and κw=10 ns-1, respectively. (a) (b) Strong-mode and weak-mode autocorrelation function of chaotic laser; (c) intensity cross-correlation point diagram of strong mode and weak mode
    Fig. 7. Related results when pump current is J=13 μA, feedback intensities of strong mode and weak mode are κs=15 ns-1 and κw=10 ns-1, respectively. (a) (b) Strong-mode and weak-mode autocorrelation function of chaotic laser; (c) intensity cross-correlation point diagram of strong mode and weak mode
    Variation of TDS peak value of strong mode and weak mode output chaotic light field with feedback intensity at different pump currents. (a) Strong mode; (b) weak mode
    Fig. 8. Variation of TDS peak value of strong mode and weak mode output chaotic light field with feedback intensity at different pump currents. (a) Strong mode; (b) weak mode
    Strong-mode and weak-mode peak values of TDS of the chaotic laser varing with linewidth enhancement factor at different pump currents. (a) Strong mode; (b) weak mode
    Fig. 9. Strong-mode and weak-mode peak values of TDS of the chaotic laser varing with linewidth enhancement factor at different pump currents. (a) Strong mode; (b) weak mode
    SymbolParameterValue
    εssAuto-compression factor (strong mode)40 m2⋅W-1
    εwwAuto-compression factor (weak mode)30 m2⋅W-1
    εswCross-compression factor (strong mode)46 m2⋅W-1
    εswCross-compression factor (weak mode)30 m2⋅W-1
    tsOptical gain coeffificient (strong mode)3.27 m2⋅V-2⋅s-1
    twOptical gain coeffificient (weak mode)2.62 m2⋅V-2⋅s-1
    βSpontaneous emission factor0.018
    JpParasitic current2.2×10-6 A
    ηInjection effificiency0.094
    τFBFeedback delay time5.5×10-9 s
    τrReservoir carrier lifetime1×10-9 s
    τspQD lifetime1×10-10 s
    SinEffective scattering rate7×10-3 m2⋅s-1
    VLasing mode volume4×10-18 m3
    AEffective lasing mode area3.1×10-12 m2
    ZQDNumber of active QDs250
    ZinacNumber of inactive QDs400
    wPhoton energy1.38 eV
    αLinewidth enhancement factor1
    Table 1. Theoretical parameters of quantum dot micropillar laser with optical feedback
    Gongming Guo, Yanqiang Guo. Two-Mode Chaos Generation in Quantum Dot Micropillar Lasers Subject to Optical Feedback[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(5): 0514003
    Download Citation