Author Affiliations
1Key Laboratory of Advanced Transducers and Intelligent Control System, Ministry of Education, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan , Shanxi 030024, China2College of Physics and Optoelectronics, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan , Shanxi 030024, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Model diagram of two-mode chaotic light field based on quantum dot micropillar laser with optical feedback. (a) Schematic of experimental setup; (b) schematic of theoretical mode
Fig. 2. When the feedback strengths of strong mode and weak mode are 15 ns-1 and 10 ns-1, theoretical chaotic output intensity of quantum dot micropillar laser as a function of pump current
Fig. 3. When feedback intensities of strong mode and weak mode are 15 ns-1 and 10 ns-1, mode-switching results between strong mode and weak mode at three pump currents. (a) 7 μA; (b) 10 μA; (c) 13 μA
Fig. 4. Power bifurcation of strong mode and weak mode varing with feedback intensity at different pump currents. (a) Strong mode of 9-19 ns-1; (b) weak mode of 5-15 ns-1
Fig. 5. Power spectra and phase attractors of two modes when pump current is =13 μA, feedback intensities of strong mode and weak mode are =15 ns-1 and =10 ns-1, respectively. (a) (b) Power spectra of strong-mode and weak-mode chaotic output; (c) (d) phase attractors of strong-mode and weak-mode chaotic output
Fig. 6. Variation of effective bandwidth of strong mode and weak mode output chaotic light field with feedback intensity at different pump currents. (a) Strong mode; (b) weak mode
Fig. 7. Related results when pump current is =13 μA, feedback intensities of strong mode and weak mode are =15 ns-1 and =10 ns-1, respectively. (a) (b) Strong-mode and weak-mode autocorrelation function of chaotic laser; (c) intensity cross-correlation point diagram of strong mode and weak mode
Fig. 8. Variation of TDS peak value of strong mode and weak mode output chaotic light field with feedback intensity at different pump currents. (a) Strong mode; (b) weak mode
Fig. 9. Strong-mode and weak-mode peak values of TDS of the chaotic laser varing with linewidth enhancement factor at different pump currents. (a) Strong mode; (b) weak mode
Symbol | Parameter | Value |
---|
| Auto-compression factor (strong mode) | 40 m2⋅W-1 | | Auto-compression factor (weak mode) | 30 m2⋅W-1 | | Cross-compression factor (strong mode) | 46 m2⋅W-1 | | Cross-compression factor (weak mode) | 30 m2⋅W-1 | | Optical gain coeffificient (strong mode) | 3.27 m2⋅V-2⋅s-1 | | Optical gain coeffificient (weak mode) | 2.62 m2⋅V-2⋅s-1 | | Spontaneous emission factor | 0.018 | | Parasitic current | 2.2×10-6 A | | Injection effificiency | 0.094 | | Feedback delay time | 5.5×10-9 s | | Reservoir carrier lifetime | 1×10-9 s | | QD lifetime | 1×10-10 s | | Effective scattering rate | 7×10-3 m2⋅s-1 | | Lasing mode volume | 4×10-18 m3 | | Effective lasing mode area | 3.1×10-12 m2 | | Number of active QDs | 250 | | Number of inactive QDs | 400 | | Photon energy | 1.38 eV | | Linewidth enhancement factor | 1 |
|
Table 1. Theoretical parameters of quantum dot micropillar laser with optical feedback