• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 60, Issue 23, 2312004 (2023)
Jiawei Zhou1,2, Wang Cheng2, Chenxuan Yin2,3, Guangyan Guo2,3..., Lifen Liao2,3, Hong Zhang1, Yi Li1, Qiangqiang Zhu1, Le Wang1,** and Yunfeng Ma2,3,*|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Optical and Electronic Technology, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, China
  • 2Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China
  • 3School of Optoelectronics, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP222868 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Jiawei Zhou, Wang Cheng, Chenxuan Yin, Guangyan Guo, Lifen Liao, Hong Zhang, Yi Li, Qiangqiang Zhu, Le Wang, Yunfeng Ma. An Allocation Method of Laser Damage Test Point Based on Nonlinear Fitting[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2023, 60(23): 2312004 Copy Citation Text show less
    Probability distribution corresponding to different fluence levels in nonlinear damage probability curve
    Fig. 1. Probability distribution corresponding to different fluence levels in nonlinear damage probability curve
    Sensitivity relationship curve between the change of test point and the root mean square error of fitting results under the level of 10 fluences. (a) Curve between the different test points and the root mean square error of fitting results under the level of 10 fluences; (b) corresponding curve to different test points under the first level energy density; (c) corresponding curve to different test points under the second level energy density
    Fig. 2. Sensitivity relationship curve between the change of test point and the root mean square error of fitting results under the level of 10 fluences. (a) Curve between the different test points and the root mean square error of fitting results under the level of 10 fluences; (b) corresponding curve to different test points under the first level energy density; (c) corresponding curve to different test points under the second level energy density
    LIDT distribution of average distribution method and sensitive weight distribution method under nonlinear fitting
    Fig. 3. LIDT distribution of average distribution method and sensitive weight distribution method under nonlinear fitting
    ItemEnergy density /(J·cm-2
    20.522.666724.83332729.166731.333333.535.666737.833340
    Damage probability /%10.2942.3361.4073.2880.9886.1289.6692.1593.9495.26
    Sensitivity weight distribution method78421010101010101010
    Average distribution method20202020202020202020
    Table 1. Test point allocation schemes of two methods under the different fluences
    ItemStandard average distribution method /(J·cm-2Sensitivity weight distribution method /(J·cm-2Model parameter estimationD /cm-2Tdefect /(J·cm-2
    Average value19.99919.9842000 ≤ D ≤ 7000
    Standard deviation of 500000 simulation results0.2720.39515 ≤ Tdefect ≤ 30
    Table 2. Results of two methods in five hundred thousand simulations
    Jiawei Zhou, Wang Cheng, Chenxuan Yin, Guangyan Guo, Lifen Liao, Hong Zhang, Yi Li, Qiangqiang Zhu, Le Wang, Yunfeng Ma. An Allocation Method of Laser Damage Test Point Based on Nonlinear Fitting[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2023, 60(23): 2312004
    Download Citation